Merge tag 'v4.13-rc1' into fixes

The fixes branch is based off a random pre-rc1 commit, because we had
some fixes that needed to go in before rc1 was released.

However we now need to fix some code that went in after that point, but
before rc1, so merge rc1 to get that code into fixes so we can fix it!

1 files changed, 350 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c
index 3b2446896147..d922a88e407f 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-matrix.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-smc.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/mtd/nand.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
@@ -64,7 +65,6 @@
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <linux/iopoll.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
-#include <linux/platform_data/atmel.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
 
 #include "pmecc.h"
@@ -151,6 +151,8 @@ struct atmel_nand_cs {
 		void __iomem *virt;
 		dma_addr_t dma;
 	} io;
+
+	struct atmel_smc_cs_conf smcconf;
 };
 
 struct atmel_nand {
@@ -196,6 +198,8 @@ struct atmel_nand_controller_ops {
 	void (*nand_init)(struct atmel_nand_controller *nc,
 			  struct atmel_nand *nand);
 	int (*ecc_init)(struct atmel_nand *nand);
+	int (*setup_data_interface)(struct atmel_nand *nand, int csline,
+				    const struct nand_data_interface *conf);
 };
 
 struct atmel_nand_controller_caps {
@@ -912,7 +916,7 @@ static int atmel_hsmc_nand_pmecc_write_pg(struct nand_chip *chip,
 	struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
 	struct atmel_nand *nand = to_atmel_nand(chip);
 	struct atmel_hsmc_nand_controller *nc;
-	int ret;
+	int ret, status;
 
 	nc = to_hsmc_nand_controller(chip->controller);
 
@@ -954,6 +958,10 @@ static int atmel_hsmc_nand_pmecc_write_pg(struct nand_chip *chip,
 		dev_err(nc->base.dev, "Failed to program NAND page (err = %d)\n",
 			ret);
 
+	status = chip->waitfunc(mtd, chip);
+	if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL)
+		return -EIO;
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1175,6 +1183,295 @@ static int atmel_hsmc_nand_ecc_init(struct atmel_nand *nand)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int atmel_smc_nand_prepare_smcconf(struct atmel_nand *nand,
+					const struct nand_data_interface *conf,
+					struct atmel_smc_cs_conf *smcconf)
+{
+	u32 ncycles, totalcycles, timeps, mckperiodps;
+	struct atmel_nand_controller *nc;
+	int ret;
+
+	nc = to_nand_controller(nand->base.controller);
+
+	/* DDR interface not supported. */
+	if (conf->type != NAND_SDR_IFACE)
+		return -ENOTSUPP;
+
+	/*
+	 * tRC < 30ns implies EDO mode. This controller does not support this
+	 * mode.
+	 */
+	if (conf->timings.sdr.tRC_min < 30)
+		return -ENOTSUPP;
+
+	atmel_smc_cs_conf_init(smcconf);
+
+	mckperiodps = NSEC_PER_SEC / clk_get_rate(nc->mck);
+	mckperiodps *= 1000;
+
+	/*
+	 * Set write pulse timing. This one is easy to extract:
+	 *
+	 * NWE_PULSE = tWP
+	 */
+	ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(conf->timings.sdr.tWP_min, mckperiodps);
+	totalcycles = ncycles;
+	ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_pulse(smcconf, ATMEL_SMC_NWE_SHIFT,
+					  ncycles);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * The write setup timing depends on the operation done on the NAND.
+	 * All operations goes through the same data bus, but the operation
+	 * type depends on the address we are writing to (ALE/CLE address
+	 * lines).
+	 * Since we have no way to differentiate the different operations at
+	 * the SMC level, we must consider the worst case (the biggest setup
+	 * time among all operation types):
+	 *
+	 * NWE_SETUP = max(tCLS, tCS, tALS, tDS) - NWE_PULSE
+	 */
+	timeps = max3(conf->timings.sdr.tCLS_min, conf->timings.sdr.tCS_min,
+		      conf->timings.sdr.tALS_min);
+	timeps = max(timeps, conf->timings.sdr.tDS_min);
+	ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(timeps, mckperiodps);
+	ncycles = ncycles > totalcycles ? ncycles - totalcycles : 0;
+	totalcycles += ncycles;
+	ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_setup(smcconf, ATMEL_SMC_NWE_SHIFT,
+					  ncycles);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * As for the write setup timing, the write hold timing depends on the
+	 * operation done on the NAND:
+	 *
+	 * NWE_HOLD = max(tCLH, tCH, tALH, tDH, tWH)
+	 */
+	timeps = max3(conf->timings.sdr.tCLH_min, conf->timings.sdr.tCH_min,
+		      conf->timings.sdr.tALH_min);
+	timeps = max3(timeps, conf->timings.sdr.tDH_min,
+		      conf->timings.sdr.tWH_min);
+	ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(timeps, mckperiodps);
+	totalcycles += ncycles;
+
+	/*
+	 * The write cycle timing is directly matching tWC, but is also
+	 * dependent on the other timings on the setup and hold timings we
+	 * calculated earlier, which gives:
+	 *
+	 * NWE_CYCLE = max(tWC, NWE_SETUP + NWE_PULSE + NWE_HOLD)
+	 */
+	ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(conf->timings.sdr.tWC_min, mckperiodps);
+	ncycles = max(totalcycles, ncycles);
+	ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_cycle(smcconf, ATMEL_SMC_NWE_SHIFT,
+					  ncycles);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * We don't want the CS line to be toggled between each byte/word
+	 * transfer to the NAND. The only way to guarantee that is to have the
+	 * NCS_{WR,RD}_{SETUP,HOLD} timings set to 0, which in turn means:
+	 *
+	 * NCS_WR_PULSE = NWE_CYCLE
+	 */
+	ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_pulse(smcconf, ATMEL_SMC_NCS_WR_SHIFT,
+					  ncycles);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * As for the write setup timing, the read hold timing depends on the
+	 * operation done on the NAND:
+	 *
+	 * NRD_HOLD = max(tREH, tRHOH)
+	 */
+	timeps = max(conf->timings.sdr.tREH_min, conf->timings.sdr.tRHOH_min);
+	ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(timeps, mckperiodps);
+	totalcycles = ncycles;
+
+	/*
+	 * TDF = tRHZ - NRD_HOLD
+	 */
+	ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(conf->timings.sdr.tRHZ_max, mckperiodps);
+	ncycles -= totalcycles;
+
+	/*
+	 * In ONFI 4.0 specs, tRHZ has been increased to support EDO NANDs and
+	 * we might end up with a config that does not fit in the TDF field.
+	 * Just take the max value in this case and hope that the NAND is more
+	 * tolerant than advertised.
+	 */
+	if (ncycles > ATMEL_SMC_MODE_TDF_MAX)
+		ncycles = ATMEL_SMC_MODE_TDF_MAX;
+	else if (ncycles < ATMEL_SMC_MODE_TDF_MIN)
+		ncycles = ATMEL_SMC_MODE_TDF_MIN;
+
+	smcconf->mode |= ATMEL_SMC_MODE_TDF(ncycles) |
+			 ATMEL_SMC_MODE_TDFMODE_OPTIMIZED;
+
+	/*
+	 * Read pulse timing directly matches tRP:
+	 *
+	 * NRD_PULSE = tRP
+	 */
+	ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(conf->timings.sdr.tRP_min, mckperiodps);
+	totalcycles += ncycles;
+	ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_pulse(smcconf, ATMEL_SMC_NRD_SHIFT,
+					  ncycles);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * The write cycle timing is directly matching tWC, but is also
+	 * dependent on the setup and hold timings we calculated earlier,
+	 * which gives:
+	 *
+	 * NRD_CYCLE = max(tRC, NRD_PULSE + NRD_HOLD)
+	 *
+	 * NRD_SETUP is always 0.
+	 */
+	ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(conf->timings.sdr.tRC_min, mckperiodps);
+	ncycles = max(totalcycles, ncycles);
+	ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_cycle(smcconf, ATMEL_SMC_NRD_SHIFT,
+					  ncycles);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * We don't want the CS line to be toggled between each byte/word
+	 * transfer from the NAND. The only way to guarantee that is to have
+	 * the NCS_{WR,RD}_{SETUP,HOLD} timings set to 0, which in turn means:
+	 *
+	 * NCS_RD_PULSE = NRD_CYCLE
+	 */
+	ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_pulse(smcconf, ATMEL_SMC_NCS_RD_SHIFT,
+					  ncycles);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* Txxx timings are directly matching tXXX ones. */
+	ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(conf->timings.sdr.tCLR_min, mckperiodps);
+	ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_timing(smcconf,
+					   ATMEL_HSMC_TIMINGS_TCLR_SHIFT,
+					   ncycles);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(conf->timings.sdr.tADL_min, mckperiodps);
+	ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_timing(smcconf,
+					   ATMEL_HSMC_TIMINGS_TADL_SHIFT,
+					   ncycles);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(conf->timings.sdr.tAR_min, mckperiodps);
+	ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_timing(smcconf,
+					   ATMEL_HSMC_TIMINGS_TAR_SHIFT,
+					   ncycles);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(conf->timings.sdr.tRR_min, mckperiodps);
+	ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_timing(smcconf,
+					   ATMEL_HSMC_TIMINGS_TRR_SHIFT,
+					   ncycles);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(conf->timings.sdr.tWB_max, mckperiodps);
+	ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_timing(smcconf,
+					   ATMEL_HSMC_TIMINGS_TWB_SHIFT,
+					   ncycles);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* Attach the CS line to the NFC logic. */
+	smcconf->timings |= ATMEL_HSMC_TIMINGS_NFSEL;
+
+	/* Set the appropriate data bus width. */
+	if (nand->base.options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16)
+		smcconf->mode |= ATMEL_SMC_MODE_DBW_16;
+
+	/* Operate in NRD/NWE READ/WRITEMODE. */
+	smcconf->mode |= ATMEL_SMC_MODE_READMODE_NRD |
+			 ATMEL_SMC_MODE_WRITEMODE_NWE;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int atmel_smc_nand_setup_data_interface(struct atmel_nand *nand,
+					int csline,
+					const struct nand_data_interface *conf)
+{
+	struct atmel_nand_controller *nc;
+	struct atmel_smc_cs_conf smcconf;
+	struct atmel_nand_cs *cs;
+	int ret;
+
+	nc = to_nand_controller(nand->base.controller);
+
+	ret = atmel_smc_nand_prepare_smcconf(nand, conf, &smcconf);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (csline == NAND_DATA_IFACE_CHECK_ONLY)
+		return 0;
+
+	cs = &nand->cs[csline];
+	cs->smcconf = smcconf;
+	atmel_smc_cs_conf_apply(nc->smc, cs->id, &cs->smcconf);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int atmel_hsmc_nand_setup_data_interface(struct atmel_nand *nand,
+					int csline,
+					const struct nand_data_interface *conf)
+{
+	struct atmel_nand_controller *nc;
+	struct atmel_smc_cs_conf smcconf;
+	struct atmel_nand_cs *cs;
+	int ret;
+
+	nc = to_nand_controller(nand->base.controller);
+
+	ret = atmel_smc_nand_prepare_smcconf(nand, conf, &smcconf);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (csline == NAND_DATA_IFACE_CHECK_ONLY)
+		return 0;
+
+	cs = &nand->cs[csline];
+	cs->smcconf = smcconf;
+
+	if (cs->rb.type == ATMEL_NAND_NATIVE_RB)
+		cs->smcconf.timings |= ATMEL_HSMC_TIMINGS_RBNSEL(cs->rb.id);
+
+	atmel_hsmc_cs_conf_apply(nc->smc, cs->id, &cs->smcconf);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int atmel_nand_setup_data_interface(struct mtd_info *mtd, int csline,
+					const struct nand_data_interface *conf)
+{
+	struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
+	struct atmel_nand *nand = to_atmel_nand(chip);
+	struct atmel_nand_controller *nc;
+
+	nc = to_nand_controller(nand->base.controller);
+
+	if (csline >= nand->numcs ||
+	    (csline < 0 && csline != NAND_DATA_IFACE_CHECK_ONLY))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return nc->caps->ops->setup_data_interface(nand, csline, conf);
+}
+
 static void atmel_nand_init(struct atmel_nand_controller *nc,
 			    struct atmel_nand *nand)
 {
@@ -1192,6 +1489,9 @@ static void atmel_nand_init(struct atmel_nand_controller *nc,
 	chip->write_buf = atmel_nand_write_buf;
 	chip->select_chip = atmel_nand_select_chip;
 
+	if (nc->mck && nc->caps->ops->setup_data_interface)
+		chip->setup_data_interface = atmel_nand_setup_data_interface;
+
 	/* Some NANDs require a longer delay than the default one (20us). */
 	chip->chip_delay = 40;
 
@@ -1677,6 +1977,12 @@ static int atmel_nand_controller_init(struct atmel_nand_controller *nc,
 	if (nc->caps->legacy_of_bindings)
 		return 0;
 
+	nc->mck = of_clk_get(dev->parent->of_node, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(nc->mck)) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to retrieve MCK clk\n");
+		return PTR_ERR(nc->mck);
+	}
+
 	np = of_parse_phandle(dev->parent->of_node, "atmel,smc", 0);
 	if (!np) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Missing or invalid atmel,smc property\n");
@@ -1983,6 +2289,7 @@ static const struct atmel_nand_controller_ops atmel_hsmc_nc_ops = {
 	.remove = atmel_hsmc_nand_controller_remove,
 	.ecc_init = atmel_hsmc_nand_ecc_init,
 	.nand_init = atmel_hsmc_nand_init,
+	.setup_data_interface = atmel_hsmc_nand_setup_data_interface,
 };
 
 static const struct atmel_nand_controller_caps atmel_sama5_nc_caps = {
@@ -2037,7 +2344,14 @@ atmel_smc_nand_controller_remove(struct atmel_nand_controller *nc)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static const struct atmel_nand_controller_ops atmel_smc_nc_ops = {
+/*
+ * The SMC reg layout of at91rm9200 is completely different which prevents us
+ * from re-using atmel_smc_nand_setup_data_interface() for the
+ * ->setup_data_interface() hook.
+ * At this point, there's no support for the at91rm9200 SMC IP, so we leave
+ * ->setup_data_interface() unassigned.
+ */
+static const struct atmel_nand_controller_ops at91rm9200_nc_ops = {
 	.probe = atmel_smc_nand_controller_probe,
 	.remove = atmel_smc_nand_controller_remove,
 	.ecc_init = atmel_nand_ecc_init,
@@ -2047,6 +2361,20 @@ static const struct atmel_nand_controller_ops atmel_smc_nc_ops = {
 static const struct atmel_nand_controller_caps atmel_rm9200_nc_caps = {
 	.ale_offs = BIT(21),
 	.cle_offs = BIT(22),
+	.ops = &at91rm9200_nc_ops,
+};
+
+static const struct atmel_nand_controller_ops atmel_smc_nc_ops = {
+	.probe = atmel_smc_nand_controller_probe,
+	.remove = atmel_smc_nand_controller_remove,
+	.ecc_init = atmel_nand_ecc_init,
+	.nand_init = atmel_smc_nand_init,
+	.setup_data_interface = atmel_smc_nand_setup_data_interface,
+};
+
+static const struct atmel_nand_controller_caps atmel_sam9260_nc_caps = {
+	.ale_offs = BIT(21),
+	.cle_offs = BIT(22),
 	.ops = &atmel_smc_nc_ops,
 };
 
@@ -2093,7 +2421,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id atmel_nand_controller_of_ids[] = {
 	},
 	{
 		.compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-nand-controller",
-		.data = &atmel_rm9200_nc_caps,
+		.data = &atmel_sam9260_nc_caps,
 	},
 	{
 		.compatible = "atmel,at91sam9261-nand-controller",
@@ -2181,6 +2509,24 @@ static int atmel_nand_controller_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return nc->caps->ops->remove(nc);
 }
 
+static __maybe_unused int atmel_nand_controller_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct atmel_nand_controller *nc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct atmel_nand *nand;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(nand, &nc->chips, node) {
+		int i;
+
+		for (i = 0; i < nand->numcs; i++)
+			nand_reset(&nand->base, i);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(atmel_nand_controller_pm_ops, NULL,
+			 atmel_nand_controller_resume);
+
 static struct platform_driver atmel_nand_controller_driver = {
 	.driver = {
 		.name = "atmel-nand-controller",