diff options
author | Mark Knibbs <markk@clara.co.uk> | 2014-10-09 12:39:40 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> | 2014-11-12 11:15:52 +0100 |
commit | fb0d82f49167a2519f8c52e91b9b278cec57bff4 (patch) | |
tree | 0e145960a344740c6bc55b2b68277e204aaf17ad /drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | |
parent | dc6311dd2a8fb9a65c1b5b94abec97bdd94cfae6 (diff) |
scsi: fix trivial typos in scsi_scan.c comment
Signed-off-by: Mark Knibbs <markk@clara.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c index ba3f1e8d0d57..619e68d015aa 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c @@ -1214,9 +1214,9 @@ static void scsi_sequential_lun_scan(struct scsi_target *starget, sparse_lun = 0; /* - * If less than SCSI_1_CSS, and no special lun scaning, stop + * If less than SCSI_1_CCS, and no special lun scanning, stop * scanning; this matches 2.4 behaviour, but could just be a bug - * (to continue scanning a SCSI_1_CSS device). + * (to continue scanning a SCSI_1_CCS device). * * This test is broken. We might not have any device on lun0 for * a sparselun device, and if that's the case then how would we |