diff options
| author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2011-04-11 13:44:25 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2011-04-11 13:44:25 -0700 |
| commit | 1c01a80cfec6f806246f31ff2680cd3639b30e67 (patch) | |
| tree | 0b554aad2ec1da71ecf6339d4ba51617bfe1dc3c /drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c | |
| parent | c44d79950b2daa1025e62eede73e4e4a274d1ef3 (diff) | |
| parent | 4a9f65f6304a00f6473e83b19c1e83caa1e42530 (diff) | |
Merge branch 'master' of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6
Conflicts:
drivers/net/smsc911x.c
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c index bef238f9ffd7..4c8b66546930 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ * arch/powerepc/include/asm/hvcserver.h * * 1.3.2 -> 1.3.3 Replaced yield() in hvcs_close() with tty_wait_until_sent() to - * prevent possible lockup with realtime scheduling as similarily pointed out by + * prevent possible lockup with realtime scheduling as similarly pointed out by * akpm in hvc_console. Changed resulted in the removal of hvcs_final_close() * to reorder cleanup operations and prevent discarding of pending data during * an hvcs_close(). Removed spinlock protection of hvcs_struct data members in @@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ static void hvcs_try_write(struct hvcs_struct *hvcsd) /* * We are still obligated to deliver the data to the * hypervisor even if the tty has been closed because - * we commited to delivering it. But don't try to wake + * we committed to delivering it. But don't try to wake * a non-existent tty. */ if (tty) { @@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ static int hvcs_write(struct tty_struct *tty, spin_lock_irqsave(&hvcsd->lock, flags); /* - * Somehow an open succedded but the device was removed or the + * Somehow an open succeeded but the device was removed or the * connection terminated between the vty-server and partner vty during * the middle of a write operation? This is a crummy place to do this * but we want to keep it all in the spinlock. @@ -1420,7 +1420,7 @@ static int hvcs_write(struct tty_struct *tty, } /* - * This is really asking how much can we guarentee that we can send or that we + * This is really asking how much can we guarantee that we can send or that we * absolutely WILL BUFFER if we can't send it. This driver MUST honor the * return value, hence the reason for hvcs_struct buffering. */ |