diff options
author | Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> | 2015-06-11 00:58:53 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> | 2015-06-30 14:36:46 -0700 |
commit | 67c5e7d464bc466471b05e027abe8a6b29687ebd (patch) | |
tree | 20f6112838a0957f6c05e5100aabb581606ea20d /fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | |
parent | e82afc52abff07a4acbc90f899598ebafb662831 (diff) |
Btrfs: fix race between balance and unused block group deletion
We have a race between deleting an unused block group and balancing the
same block group that leads to an assertion failure/BUG(), producing the
following trace:
[181631.208236] BTRFS: assertion failed: 0, file: fs/btrfs/volumes.c, line: 2622
[181631.220591] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[181631.222959] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:4062!
[181631.223932] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[181631.224566] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_flakey dm_mod crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse acpi_cpufreq parpor$
[181631.224566] CPU: 8 PID: 17451 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.1.0-rc5-btrfs-next-10+ #1
[181631.224566] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
[181631.224566] task: ffff880127e09590 ti: ffff8800b5824000 task.ti: ffff8800b5824000
[181631.224566] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa03f19f6>] [<ffffffffa03f19f6>] assfail.constprop.50+0x1e/0x20 [btrfs]
[181631.224566] RSP: 0018:ffff8800b5827ae8 EFLAGS: 00010246
[181631.224566] RAX: 0000000000000040 RBX: ffff8800109fc218 RCX: ffffffff81095dce
[181631.224566] RDX: 0000000000005124 RSI: ffffffff81464819 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[181631.224566] RBP: ffff8800b5827ae8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
[181631.224566] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8800109fc200
[181631.224566] R13: ffff880020095000 R14: ffff8800b1a13f38 R15: ffff880020095000
[181631.224566] FS: 00007f70ca0b0c80(0000) GS:ffff88013ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[181631.224566] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[181631.224566] CR2: 00007f2872ab6e68 CR3: 00000000a717c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[181631.224566] Stack:
[181631.224566] ffff8800b5827ba8 ffffffffa03f3916 ffff8800b5827b38 ffffffffa03d080e
[181631.224566] ffffffffa03d1423 ffff880020095000 ffff88001233c000 0000000000000001
[181631.224566] ffff880020095000 ffff8800b1a13f38 0000000a69c00000 0000000000000000
[181631.224566] Call Trace:
[181631.224566] [<ffffffffa03f3916>] btrfs_remove_chunk+0xa4/0x6bb [btrfs]
[181631.224566] [<ffffffffa03d080e>] ? join_transaction.isra.8+0xb9/0x3ba [btrfs]
[181631.224566] [<ffffffffa03d1423>] ? wait_current_trans.isra.13+0x22/0xfc [btrfs]
[181631.224566] [<ffffffffa03f3fbc>] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.29+0x8f/0xa7 [btrfs]
[181631.224566] [<ffffffffa03f54df>] btrfs_balance+0xaa4/0xc52 [btrfs]
[181631.224566] [<ffffffffa03fd388>] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x23f/0x2b0 [btrfs]
[181631.224566] [<ffffffff810872f9>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[181631.224566] [<ffffffffa04019a3>] btrfs_ioctl+0xfe2/0x2220 [btrfs]
[181631.224566] [<ffffffff812603ed>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x15
[181631.224566] [<ffffffff81084669>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
[181631.224566] [<ffffffff81138def>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x834/0xcd2
[181631.224566] [<ffffffff81138def>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x834/0xcd2
[181631.224566] [<ffffffff8103e48c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x211/0x424
[181631.224566] [<ffffffff811755e6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x3c6/0x479
(...)
The sequence of steps leading to this are:
CPU 0 CPU 1
btrfs_balance()
btrfs_relocate_chunk()
btrfs_relocate_block_group(bg X)
btrfs_lookup_block_group(bg X)
cleaner_kthread
locks fs_info->cleaner_mutex
btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()
finds bg X, which became
unused in the previous
transaction
checks bg X ->ro == 0,
so it proceeds
sets bg X ->ro to 1
(btrfs_set_block_group_ro(bg X))
blocks on fs_info->cleaner_mutex
btrfs_remove_chunk(bg X)
unlocks fs_info->cleaner_mutex
acquires fs_info->cleaner_mutex
relocate_block_group()
--> does nothing, no extents found in
the extent tree from bg X
unlocks fs_info->cleaner_mutex
btrfs_relocate_block_group(bg X) returns
btrfs_remove_chunk(bg X)
extent map not found
--> ASSERT(0)
Fix this by using a new mutex to make sure these 2 operations, block
group relocation and removal, are serialized.
This issue is reproducible by running fstests generic/038 (which stresses
chunk allocation and automatic removal of unused block groups) together
with the following balance loop:
while true; do btrfs balance start -dusage=0 <mountpoint> ; done
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/disk-io.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c index b977fc8d8201..b59deb2c63f4 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -1772,7 +1772,6 @@ static int cleaner_kthread(void *arg) } btrfs_run_delayed_iputs(root); - btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(root->fs_info); again = btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot(root); mutex_unlock(&root->fs_info->cleaner_mutex); @@ -1781,6 +1780,16 @@ static int cleaner_kthread(void *arg) * needn't do anything special here. */ btrfs_run_defrag_inodes(root->fs_info); + + /* + * Acquires fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex to avoid racing + * with relocation (btrfs_relocate_chunk) and relocation + * acquires fs_info->cleaner_mutex (btrfs_relocate_block_group) + * after acquiring fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex. So we + * can't hold, nor need to, fs_info->cleaner_mutex when deleting + * unused block groups. + */ + btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(root->fs_info); sleep: if (!try_to_freeze() && !again) { set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); @@ -2492,6 +2501,7 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb, spin_lock_init(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock); rwlock_init(&fs_info->tree_mod_log_lock); mutex_init(&fs_info->unused_bg_unpin_mutex); + mutex_init(&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex); mutex_init(&fs_info->reloc_mutex); mutex_init(&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex); seqlock_init(&fs_info->profiles_lock); |