diff options
author | Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> | 2014-11-19 10:25:09 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> | 2014-11-19 10:34:35 -0800 |
commit | f82c458a2c3ffb94b431fc6ad791a79df1b3713e (patch) | |
tree | 0eca3f95f74d1cde140366002b3cd794ce96f67c /fs/btrfs/locking.c | |
parent | 6e5aafb27419f32575b27ef9d6a31e5d54661aca (diff) |
btrfs: fix lockups from btrfs_clear_path_blocking
The fair reader/writer locks mean that btrfs_clear_path_blocking needs
to strictly follow lock ordering rules even when we already have
blocking locks on a given path.
Before we can clear a blocking lock on the path, we need to make sure
all of the locks have been converted to blocking. This will remove lock
inversions against anyone spinning in write_lock() against the buffers
we're trying to get read locks on. These inversions didn't exist before
the fair read/writer locks, but now we need to be more careful.
We papered over this deadlock in the past by changing
btrfs_try_read_lock() to be a true trylock against both the spinlock and
the blocking lock. This was slower, and not sufficient to fix all the
deadlocks. This patch adds a btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic(), which
basically means get the spinlock but trylock on the blocking lock.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reported-by: Patrick Schmid <schmid@phys.ethz.ch>
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v3.15+
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/locking.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/locking.c | 24 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c index 5665d2149249..f8229ef1b46d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/locking.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.c @@ -128,6 +128,26 @@ again: } /* + * take a spinning read lock. + * returns 1 if we get the read lock and 0 if we don't + * this won't wait for blocking writers + */ +int btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic(struct extent_buffer *eb) +{ + if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers)) + return 0; + + read_lock(&eb->lock); + if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers)) { + read_unlock(&eb->lock); + return 0; + } + atomic_inc(&eb->read_locks); + atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_readers); + return 1; +} + +/* * returns 1 if we get the read lock and 0 if we don't * this won't wait for blocking writers */ @@ -158,9 +178,7 @@ int btrfs_try_tree_write_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb) atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers)) return 0; - if (!write_trylock(&eb->lock)) - return 0; - + write_lock(&eb->lock); if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) || atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers)) { write_unlock(&eb->lock); |