fscrypt: add Adiantum support

Add support for the Adiantum encryption mode to fscrypt.  Adiantum is a
tweakable, length-preserving encryption mode with security provably
reducible to that of XChaCha12 and AES-256, subject to a security bound.
It's also a true wide-block mode, unlike XTS.  See the paper
"Adiantum: length-preserving encryption for entry-level processors"
(https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/720.pdf) for more details.  Also see
commit 059c2a4d8e16 ("crypto: adiantum - add Adiantum support").

On sufficiently long messages, Adiantum's bottlenecks are XChaCha12 and
the NH hash function.  These algorithms are fast even on processors
without dedicated crypto instructions.  Adiantum makes it feasible to
enable storage encryption on low-end mobile devices that lack AES
instructions; currently such devices are unencrypted.  On ARM Cortex-A7,
on 4096-byte messages Adiantum encryption is about 4 times faster than
AES-256-XTS encryption; decryption is about 5 times faster.

In fscrypt, Adiantum is suitable for encrypting both file contents and
names.  With filenames, it fixes a known weakness: when two filenames in
a directory share a common prefix of >= 16 bytes, with CTS-CBC their
encrypted filenames share a common prefix too, leaking information.
Adiantum does not have this problem.

Since Adiantum also accepts long tweaks (IVs), it's also safe to use the
master key directly for Adiantum encryption rather than deriving
per-file keys, provided that the per-file nonce is included in the IVs
and the master key isn't used for any other encryption mode.  This
configuration saves memory and improves performance.  A new fscrypt
policy flag is added to allow users to opt-in to this configuration.

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/fs/crypto/crypto.c b/fs/crypto/crypto.c
index 0f46cf550907..4dc788e3bc96 100644
--- a/fs/crypto/crypto.c
+++ b/fs/crypto/crypto.c
@@ -133,15 +133,25 @@ struct fscrypt_ctx *fscrypt_get_ctx(const struct inode *inode, gfp_t gfp_flags)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(fscrypt_get_ctx);
 
+void fscrypt_generate_iv(union fscrypt_iv *iv, u64 lblk_num,
+			 const struct fscrypt_info *ci)
+{
+	memset(iv, 0, ci->ci_mode->ivsize);
+	iv->lblk_num = cpu_to_le64(lblk_num);
+
+	if (ci->ci_flags & FS_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY)
+		memcpy(iv->nonce, ci->ci_nonce, FS_KEY_DERIVATION_NONCE_SIZE);
+
+	if (ci->ci_essiv_tfm != NULL)
+		crypto_cipher_encrypt_one(ci->ci_essiv_tfm, iv->raw, iv->raw);
+}
+
 int fscrypt_do_page_crypto(const struct inode *inode, fscrypt_direction_t rw,
 			   u64 lblk_num, struct page *src_page,
 			   struct page *dest_page, unsigned int len,
 			   unsigned int offs, gfp_t gfp_flags)
 {
-	struct {
-		__le64 index;
-		u8 padding[FS_IV_SIZE - sizeof(__le64)];
-	} iv;
+	union fscrypt_iv iv;
 	struct skcipher_request *req = NULL;
 	DECLARE_CRYPTO_WAIT(wait);
 	struct scatterlist dst, src;
@@ -151,15 +161,7 @@ int fscrypt_do_page_crypto(const struct inode *inode, fscrypt_direction_t rw,
 
 	BUG_ON(len == 0);
 
-	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(iv) != FS_IV_SIZE);
-	BUILD_BUG_ON(AES_BLOCK_SIZE != FS_IV_SIZE);
-	iv.index = cpu_to_le64(lblk_num);
-	memset(iv.padding, 0, sizeof(iv.padding));
-
-	if (ci->ci_essiv_tfm != NULL) {
-		crypto_cipher_encrypt_one(ci->ci_essiv_tfm, (u8 *)&iv,
-					  (u8 *)&iv);
-	}
+	fscrypt_generate_iv(&iv, lblk_num, ci);
 
 	req = skcipher_request_alloc(tfm, gfp_flags);
 	if (!req)