[PATCH] fuse: scramble lock owner ID

VFS uses current->files pointer as lock owner ID, and it wouldn't be
prudent to expose this value to userspace.  So scramble it with XTEA using
a per connection random key, known only to the kernel.  Only one direction
needs to be implemented, since the ID is never sent in the reverse
direction.

The XTEA algorithm is implemented inline since it's simple enough to do so,
and this adds less complexity than if the crypto API were used.

Thanks to Jesper Juhl for the idea.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 20 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
index 36f92f181d2f..28aa81eae2cc 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -161,15 +161,25 @@ static int fuse_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 }
 
 /*
- * It would be nice to scramble the ID space, so that the value of the
- * files_struct pointer is not exposed to userspace.  Symmetric crypto
- * functions are overkill, since the inverse function doesn't need to
- * be implemented (though it does have to exist).  Is there something
- * simpler?
+ * Scramble the ID space with XTEA, so that the value of the files_struct
+ * pointer is not exposed to userspace.
  */
-static inline u64 fuse_lock_owner_id(fl_owner_t id)
+static u64 fuse_lock_owner_id(struct fuse_conn *fc, fl_owner_t id)
 {
-	return (unsigned long) id;
+	u32 *k = fc->scramble_key;
+	u64 v = (unsigned long) id;
+	u32 v0 = v;
+	u32 v1 = v >> 32;
+	u32 sum = 0;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
+		v0 += ((v1 << 4 ^ v1 >> 5) + v1) ^ (sum + k[sum & 3]);
+		sum += 0x9E3779B9;
+		v1 += ((v0 << 4 ^ v0 >> 5) + v0) ^ (sum + k[sum>>11 & 3]);
+	}
+
+	return (u64) v0 + ((u64) v1 << 32);
 }
 
 static int fuse_flush(struct file *file, fl_owner_t id)
@@ -190,7 +200,7 @@ static int fuse_flush(struct file *file, fl_owner_t id)
 	req = fuse_get_req_nofail(fc, file);
 	memset(&inarg, 0, sizeof(inarg));
 	inarg.fh = ff->fh;
-	inarg.lock_owner = fuse_lock_owner_id(id);
+	inarg.lock_owner = fuse_lock_owner_id(fc, id);
 	req->in.h.opcode = FUSE_FLUSH;
 	req->in.h.nodeid = get_node_id(inode);
 	req->in.numargs = 1;
@@ -644,11 +654,12 @@ static void fuse_lk_fill(struct fuse_req *req, struct file *file,
 			 const struct file_lock *fl, int opcode, pid_t pid)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = file->f_dentry->d_inode;
+	struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
 	struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
 	struct fuse_lk_in *arg = &req->misc.lk_in;
 
 	arg->fh = ff->fh;
-	arg->owner = fuse_lock_owner_id(fl->fl_owner);
+	arg->owner = fuse_lock_owner_id(fc, fl->fl_owner);
 	arg->lk.start = fl->fl_start;
 	arg->lk.end = fl->fl_end;
 	arg->lk.type = fl->fl_type;