diff options
| author | Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> | 2011-07-14 08:59:44 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> | 2011-07-14 08:59:44 +0100 |
| commit | 380f7c65a7eb3288e4b6812acf3474a1de230707 (patch) | |
| tree | 7abe4b4ce390afc6b4d2bc7cae0ec298fe2efa3c /fs/gfs2/aops.c | |
| parent | 3942ae5319640ced5844b75f44884e4bcb8a2f16 (diff) | |
GFS2: Resolve inode eviction and ail list interaction bug
This patch contains a few misc fixes which resolve a recently
reported issue. This patch has been a real team effort and has
received a lot of testing.
The first issue is that the ail lock needs to be held over a few
more operations. The lock thats added into gfs2_releasepage() may
possibly be a candidate for replacing with RCU at some future
point, but at this stage we've gone for the obvious fix.
The second issue is that gfs2_write_inode() can end up calling
a glock recursively when called from gfs2_evict_inode() via the
syncing code, so it needs a guard added.
The third issue is that we either need to not truncate the metadata
pages of inodes which have zero link count, but which we cannot
deallocate due to them still being in use by other nodes, or we need
to ensure that those pages have all made it through the journal and
ail lists first. This patch takes the former approach, but the
latter has also been tested and there is nothing to choose between
them performance-wise. So again, we could revise that decision
in the future.
Also, the inode eviction process is now better documented.
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Abhijith Das <adas@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Barry J. Marson <bmarson@redhat.com>
Reported-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/gfs2/aops.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/gfs2/aops.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/aops.c b/fs/gfs2/aops.c index 802ac5eeba28..f9fbbe96c222 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/aops.c +++ b/fs/gfs2/aops.c @@ -1069,6 +1069,7 @@ int gfs2_releasepage(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp_mask) return 0; gfs2_log_lock(sdp); + spin_lock(&sdp->sd_ail_lock); head = bh = page_buffers(page); do { if (atomic_read(&bh->b_count)) @@ -1080,6 +1081,7 @@ int gfs2_releasepage(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp_mask) goto not_possible; bh = bh->b_this_page; } while(bh != head); + spin_unlock(&sdp->sd_ail_lock); gfs2_log_unlock(sdp); head = bh = page_buffers(page); @@ -1112,6 +1114,7 @@ not_possible: /* Should never happen */ WARN_ON(buffer_dirty(bh)); WARN_ON(buffer_pinned(bh)); cannot_release: + spin_unlock(&sdp->sd_ail_lock); gfs2_log_unlock(sdp); return 0; } |