diff options
author | Andreas Rohner <andreas.rohner@gmx.net> | 2014-01-14 17:56:36 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2014-01-15 14:19:42 +0700 |
commit | 70f2fe3a26248724d8a5019681a869abdaf3e89a (patch) | |
tree | 0aac8bf02f569804fdc96f2230b0f1906111fbd0 /fs/nilfs2 | |
parent | a6da83f98267bc8ee4e34aa899169991eb0ceb93 (diff) |
nilfs2: fix segctor bug that causes file system corruption
There is a bug in the function nilfs_segctor_collect, which results in
active data being written to a segment, that is marked as clean. It is
possible, that this segment is selected for a later segment
construction, whereby the old data is overwritten.
The problem shows itself with the following kernel log message:
nilfs_sufile_do_cancel_free: segment 6533 must be clean
Usually a few hours later the file system gets corrupted:
NILFS: bad btree node (blocknr=8748107): level = 0, flags = 0x0, nchildren = 0
NILFS error (device sdc1): nilfs_bmap_last_key: broken bmap (inode number=114660)
The issue can be reproduced with a file system that is nearly full and
with the cleaner running, while some IO intensive task is running.
Although it is quite hard to reproduce.
This is what happens:
1. The cleaner starts the segment construction
2. nilfs_segctor_collect is called
3. sc_stage is on NILFS_ST_SUFILE and segments are freed
4. sc_stage is on NILFS_ST_DAT current segment is full
5. nilfs_segctor_extend_segments is called, which
allocates a new segment
6. The new segment is one of the segments freed in step 3
7. nilfs_sufile_cancel_freev is called and produces an error message
8. Loop around and the collection starts again
9. sc_stage is on NILFS_ST_SUFILE and segments are freed
including the newly allocated segment, which will contain active
data and can be allocated at a later time
10. A few hours later another segment construction allocates the
segment and causes file system corruption
This can be prevented by simply reordering the statements. If
nilfs_sufile_cancel_freev is called before nilfs_segctor_extend_segments
the freed segments are marked as dirty and cannot be allocated any more.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rohner <andreas.rohner@gmx.net>
Reviewed-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Tested-by: Andreas Rohner <andreas.rohner@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/nilfs2')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/nilfs2/segment.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c index 9f6b486b6c01..a1a191634abc 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c @@ -1440,17 +1440,19 @@ static int nilfs_segctor_collect(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci, nilfs_clear_logs(&sci->sc_segbufs); - err = nilfs_segctor_extend_segments(sci, nilfs, nadd); - if (unlikely(err)) - return err; - if (sci->sc_stage.flags & NILFS_CF_SUFREED) { err = nilfs_sufile_cancel_freev(nilfs->ns_sufile, sci->sc_freesegs, sci->sc_nfreesegs, NULL); WARN_ON(err); /* do not happen */ + sci->sc_stage.flags &= ~NILFS_CF_SUFREED; } + + err = nilfs_segctor_extend_segments(sci, nilfs, nadd); + if (unlikely(err)) + return err; + nadd = min_t(int, nadd << 1, SC_MAX_SEGDELTA); sci->sc_stage = prev_stage; } |