diff options
author | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> | 2014-05-27 17:02:04 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2014-06-05 11:07:41 +0200 |
commit | e9dd685ce81815811fb4da72e6ab10a694ac8468 (patch) | |
tree | c429c73cf5883cf54aef8b07c71b212c1c708071 /fs/udf/inode.c | |
parent | 6acbfb96976fc3350e30d964acb1dbbdf876d55e (diff) |
sched/numa: Fix use of spin_{un}lock_irq() when interrupts are disabled
As Peter Zijlstra told me, we have the following path:
do_exit()
exit_itimers()
itimer_delete()
spin_lock_irqsave(&timer->it_lock, &flags);
timer_delete_hook(timer);
kc->timer_del(timer) := posix_cpu_timer_del()
put_task_struct()
__put_task_struct()
task_numa_free()
spin_lock(&grp->lock);
Which means that task_numa_free() can be called with interrupts
disabled, which means that we should not be using spin_lock_irq() but
spin_lock_irqsave() instead. Otherwise we are enabling interrupts while
holding an interrupt unsafe lock!
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner<tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140527182541.GH11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/udf/inode.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions