writeback: flush inode cgroup wb switches instead of pinning super_block

commit a1a0e23e49037c23ea84bc8cc146a03584d13577 upstream.

If cgroup writeback is in use, inodes can be scheduled for
asynchronous wb switching.  Before 5ff8eaac1636 ("writeback: keep
superblock pinned during cgroup writeback association switches"), this
could race with umount leading to super_block being destroyed while
inodes are pinned for wb switching.  5ff8eaac1636 fixed it by bumping
s_active while wb switches are in flight; however, this allowed
in-flight wb switches to make umounts asynchronous when the userland
expected synchronosity - e.g. fsck immediately following umount may
fail because the device is still busy.

This patch removes the problematic super_block pinning and instead
makes generic_shutdown_super() flush in-flight wb switches.  wb
switches are now executed on a dedicated isw_wq so that they can be
flushed and isw_nr_in_flight keeps track of the number of in-flight wb
switches so that flushing can be avoided in most cases.

v2: Move cgroup_writeback_umount() further below and add MS_ACTIVE
    check in inode_switch_wbs() as Jan an Al suggested.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/g/CAAeU0aNCq7LGODvVGRU-oU_o-6enii5ey0p1c26D1ZzYwkDc5A@mail.gmail.com
Fixes: 5ff8eaac1636 ("writeback: keep superblock pinned during cgroup writeback association switches")
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Tested-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2 files changed, 42 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index e5232bbcbe3d..7a8ea1351584 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -223,6 +223,9 @@ static void wb_wait_for_completion(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
 #define WB_FRN_HIST_MAX_SLOTS	(WB_FRN_HIST_THR_SLOTS / 2 + 1)
 					/* one round can affect upto 5 slots */
 
+static atomic_t isw_nr_in_flight = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+static struct workqueue_struct *isw_wq;
+
 void __inode_attach_wb(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
 {
 	struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(inode);
@@ -317,7 +320,6 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 	struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw =
 		container_of(work, struct inode_switch_wbs_context, work);
 	struct inode *inode = isw->inode;
-	struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
 	struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
 	struct bdi_writeback *old_wb = inode->i_wb;
 	struct bdi_writeback *new_wb = isw->new_wb;
@@ -424,8 +426,9 @@ skip_switch:
 	wb_put(new_wb);
 
 	iput(inode);
-	deactivate_super(sb);
 	kfree(isw);
+
+	atomic_dec(&isw_nr_in_flight);
 }
 
 static void inode_switch_wbs_rcu_fn(struct rcu_head *rcu_head)
@@ -435,7 +438,7 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs_rcu_fn(struct rcu_head *rcu_head)
 
 	/* needs to grab bh-unsafe locks, bounce to work item */
 	INIT_WORK(&isw->work, inode_switch_wbs_work_fn);
-	schedule_work(&isw->work);
+	queue_work(isw_wq, &isw->work);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -471,20 +474,20 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode, int new_wb_id)
 
 	/* while holding I_WB_SWITCH, no one else can update the association */
 	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
-
-	if (inode->i_state & (I_WB_SWITCH | I_FREEING) ||
-	    inode_to_wb(inode) == isw->new_wb)
-		goto out_unlock;
-
-	if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&inode->i_sb->s_active))
-		goto out_unlock;
-
+	if (!(inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_ACTIVE) ||
+	    inode->i_state & (I_WB_SWITCH | I_FREEING) ||
+	    inode_to_wb(inode) == isw->new_wb) {
+		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+		goto out_free;
+	}
 	inode->i_state |= I_WB_SWITCH;
 	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 
 	ihold(inode);
 	isw->inode = inode;
 
+	atomic_inc(&isw_nr_in_flight);
+
 	/*
 	 * In addition to synchronizing among switchers, I_WB_SWITCH tells
 	 * the RCU protected stat update paths to grab the mapping's
@@ -494,8 +497,6 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode, int new_wb_id)
 	call_rcu(&isw->rcu_head, inode_switch_wbs_rcu_fn);
 	return;
 
-out_unlock:
-	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 out_free:
 	if (isw->new_wb)
 		wb_put(isw->new_wb);
@@ -849,6 +850,33 @@ restart:
 		wb_put(last_wb);
 }
 
+/**
+ * cgroup_writeback_umount - flush inode wb switches for umount
+ *
+ * This function is called when a super_block is about to be destroyed and
+ * flushes in-flight inode wb switches.  An inode wb switch goes through
+ * RCU and then workqueue, so the two need to be flushed in order to ensure
+ * that all previously scheduled switches are finished.  As wb switches are
+ * rare occurrences and synchronize_rcu() can take a while, perform
+ * flushing iff wb switches are in flight.
+ */
+void cgroup_writeback_umount(void)
+{
+	if (atomic_read(&isw_nr_in_flight)) {
+		synchronize_rcu();
+		flush_workqueue(isw_wq);
+	}
+}
+
+static int __init cgroup_writeback_init(void)
+{
+	isw_wq = alloc_workqueue("inode_switch_wbs", 0, 0);
+	if (!isw_wq)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	return 0;
+}
+fs_initcall(cgroup_writeback_init);
+
 #else	/* CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK */
 
 static struct bdi_writeback *
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index 954aeb80e202..f5f4b328f860 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -415,6 +415,7 @@ void generic_shutdown_super(struct super_block *sb)
 		sb->s_flags &= ~MS_ACTIVE;
 
 		fsnotify_unmount_inodes(sb);
+		cgroup_writeback_umount();
 
 		evict_inodes(sb);