diff options
| author | Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@net.rmk.(none)> | 2005-06-03 20:52:25 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> | 2005-06-03 20:52:25 +0100 |
| commit | 4ab5c01c7cc28f29d5cf5f2a591cb6f7bbece48e (patch) | |
| tree | d69fc21d2dbba664249efe6394213a11a119dcc1 /include/asm-arm/arch-ixp2000 | |
| parent | eff910a91ac04ab1d9e210d4f721484af3b39c8d (diff) | |
[PATCH] ARM: 2692/1: Fix compile warnings in include/asm-arm/arch-ixp2000/io.h
Patch from Deepak Saxena
This patch fixes the following warnings:
include/asm/arch/io.h: In function `insw':
include/asm/arch/io.h:78: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types
lacks acast
include/asm/arch/io.h:79: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types
lacks acast
include/asm/arch/io.h: In function `outsw':
include/asm/arch/io.h:103: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types
lacks a cast
include/asm/arch/io.h:104: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types
lacks a cast
include/asm/arch/io.h: In function `inw':
include/asm/arch/io.h:127: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types
lacks a cast
Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/asm-arm/arch-ixp2000')
| -rw-r--r-- | include/asm-arm/arch-ixp2000/io.h | 16 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-ixp2000/io.h b/include/asm-arm/arch-ixp2000/io.h index a8e3c2daefd6..083462668e18 100644 --- a/include/asm-arm/arch-ixp2000/io.h +++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-ixp2000/io.h @@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ static inline void insw(u32 ptr, void *buf, int length) * Is this cycle meant for the CS8900? */ if ((machine_is_ixdp2401() || machine_is_ixdp2801()) && - ((port >= IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_BASE) && - (port <= IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_END))) { + (((u32)port >= (u32)IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_BASE) && + ((u32)port <= (u32)IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_END))) { u8 *buf8 = (u8*)buf; register u32 tmp32; @@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ static inline void outsw(u32 ptr, void *buf, int length) * Is this cycle meant for the CS8900? */ if ((machine_is_ixdp2401() || machine_is_ixdp2801()) && - ((port >= IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_BASE) && - (port <= IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_END))) { + (((u32)port >= (u32)IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_BASE) && + ((u32)port <= (u32)IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_END))) { register u32 tmp32; u8 *buf8 = (u8*)buf; do { @@ -124,8 +124,8 @@ static inline u16 inw(u32 ptr) * Is this cycle meant for the CS8900? */ if ((machine_is_ixdp2401() || machine_is_ixdp2801()) && - ((port >= IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_BASE) && - (port <= IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_END))) { + (((u32)port >= (u32)IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_BASE) && + ((u32)port <= (u32)IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_END))) { return (u16)(*port); } @@ -137,8 +137,8 @@ static inline void outw(u16 value, u32 ptr) register volatile u32 *port = (volatile u32 *)ptr; if ((machine_is_ixdp2401() || machine_is_ixdp2801()) && - ((port >= IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_BASE) && - (port <= IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_END))) { + (((u32)port >= (u32)IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_BASE) && + ((u32)port <= (u32)IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_END))) { *port = value; return; } |