diff options
| author | Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2009-09-28 07:46:32 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2009-10-05 21:02:02 +0200 |
| commit | 3d76c082907e8f83c5d5c4572f38d53ad8f00c4b (patch) | |
| tree | a39c3d3ea17dc085195626487f37995beb742ac0 /include/linux/rcupdate.h | |
| parent | 162cc2794df37662beb7f97ddd1dd5bffaf85e9a (diff) | |
rcu: Clean up code based on review feedback from Josh Triplett, part 3
Whitespace fixes, updated comments, and trivial code movement.
o Fix whitespace error in RCU_HEAD_INIT()
o Move "So where is rcu_write_lock()" comment so that it does
not come between the rcu_read_unlock() header comment and
the rcu_read_unlock() definition.
o Move the module_param statements for blimit, qhimark, and
qlowmark to immediately follow the corresponding
definitions.
o In __rcu_offline_cpu(), move the assignment to rdp_me
inside the "if" statement, given that rdp_me is not used
outside of that "if" statement.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca
Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org
Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com
Cc: niv@us.ibm.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com
LKML-Reference: <12541491931164-git-send-email->
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/rcupdate.h')
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/rcupdate.h | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h index 70331218e4b4..3ebd0b7bcb08 100644 --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ extern int rcu_scheduler_active; #error "Unknown RCU implementation specified to kernel configuration" #endif -#define RCU_HEAD_INIT { .next = NULL, .func = NULL } +#define RCU_HEAD_INIT { .next = NULL, .func = NULL } #define RCU_HEAD(head) struct rcu_head head = RCU_HEAD_INIT #define INIT_RCU_HEAD(ptr) do { \ (ptr)->next = NULL; (ptr)->func = NULL; \ @@ -129,12 +129,6 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock(void) rcu_read_acquire(); } -/** - * rcu_read_unlock - marks the end of an RCU read-side critical section. - * - * See rcu_read_lock() for more information. - */ - /* * So where is rcu_write_lock()? It does not exist, as there is no * way for writers to lock out RCU readers. This is a feature, not @@ -144,6 +138,12 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock(void) * used as well. RCU does not care how the writers keep out of each * others' way, as long as they do so. */ + +/** + * rcu_read_unlock - marks the end of an RCU read-side critical section. + * + * See rcu_read_lock() for more information. + */ static inline void rcu_read_unlock(void) { rcu_read_release(); |