[PATCH] spi: add spi_bitbang driver

This adds a bitbanging spi master, hooking up to board/adapter-specific glue
code which knows how to set and read the signals (gpios etc).

This code kicks in after the glue code creates a platform_device with the
right platform_data.  That data includes I/O loops, which will usually
come from expanding an inline function (provided in the header).  One goal
is that the I/O loops should be easily optimized down to a few GPIO register
accesses, in common cases, for speed and minimized overhead.

This understands all the currently defined protocol tweaking options in the
SPI framework, and might eventually serve as as reference implementation.

  - different word sizes (1..32 bits)
  - differing clock rates
  - SPI modes differing by CPOL (affecting chip select and I/O loops)
  - SPI modes differing by CPHA (affecting I/O loops)
  - delays (usecs) after transfers
  - temporarily deselecting chips in mid-transfer

A lot of hardware could work with this framework, though common types of
controller can't reach peak performance without switching to a driver
structure that supports pipelining of transfers (e.g.  DMA queues) and maybe
controllers (e.g.  IRQ driven).

Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

1 files changed, 128 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi_bitbang.h b/include/linux/spi/spi_bitbang.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8dfe61a445f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/spi/spi_bitbang.h
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+#ifndef	__SPI_BITBANG_H
+#define	__SPI_BITBANG_H
+
+/*
+ * Mix this utility code with some glue code to get one of several types of
+ * simple SPI master driver.  Two do polled word-at-a-time I/O:
+ *
+ *   -	GPIO/parport bitbangers.  Provide chipselect() and txrx_word[](),
+ *	expanding the per-word routines from the inline templates below.
+ *
+ *   -	Drivers for controllers resembling bare shift registers.  Provide
+ *	chipselect() and txrx_word[](), with custom setup()/cleanup() methods
+ *	that use your controller's clock and chipselect registers.
+ *
+ * Some hardware works well with requests at spi_transfer scope:
+ *
+ *   -	Drivers leveraging smarter hardware, with fifos or DMA; or for half
+ *	duplex (MicroWire) controllers.  Provide chipslect() and txrx_bufs(),
+ *	and custom setup()/cleanup() methods.
+ */
+struct spi_bitbang {
+	struct workqueue_struct	*workqueue;
+	struct work_struct	work;
+
+	spinlock_t		lock;
+	struct list_head	queue;
+	u8			busy;
+	u8			shutdown;
+	u8			use_dma;
+
+	struct spi_master	*master;
+
+	void	(*chipselect)(struct spi_device *spi, int is_on);
+
+	int	(*txrx_bufs)(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_transfer *t);
+	u32	(*txrx_word[4])(struct spi_device *spi,
+			unsigned nsecs,
+			u32 word, u8 bits);
+};
+
+/* you can call these default bitbang->master methods from your custom
+ * methods, if you like.
+ */
+extern int spi_bitbang_setup(struct spi_device *spi);
+extern void spi_bitbang_cleanup(const struct spi_device *spi);
+extern int spi_bitbang_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *m);
+
+/* start or stop queue processing */
+extern int spi_bitbang_start(struct spi_bitbang *spi);
+extern int spi_bitbang_stop(struct spi_bitbang *spi);
+
+#endif	/* __SPI_BITBANG_H */
+
+/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
+
+#ifdef	EXPAND_BITBANG_TXRX
+
+/*
+ * The code that knows what GPIO pins do what should have declared four
+ * functions, ideally as inlines, before #defining EXPAND_BITBANG_TXRX
+ * and including this header:
+ *
+ *  void setsck(struct spi_device *, int is_on);
+ *  void setmosi(struct spi_device *, int is_on);
+ *  int getmiso(struct spi_device *);
+ *  void spidelay(unsigned);
+ *
+ * A non-inlined routine would call bitbang_txrx_*() routines.  The
+ * main loop could easily compile down to a handful of instructions,
+ * especially if the delay is a NOP (to run at peak speed).
+ *
+ * Since this is software, the timings may not be exactly what your board's
+ * chips need ... there may be several reasons you'd need to tweak timings
+ * in these routines, not just make to make it faster or slower to match a
+ * particular CPU clock rate.
+ */
+
+static inline u32
+bitbang_txrx_be_cpha0(struct spi_device *spi,
+		unsigned nsecs, unsigned cpol,
+		u32 word, u8 bits)
+{
+	/* if (cpol == 0) this is SPI_MODE_0; else this is SPI_MODE_2 */
+
+	/* clock starts at inactive polarity */
+	for (word <<= (32 - bits); likely(bits); bits--) {
+
+		/* setup MSB (to slave) on trailing edge */
+		setmosi(spi, word & (1 << 31));
+		spidelay(nsecs);	/* T(setup) */
+
+		setsck(spi, !cpol);
+		spidelay(nsecs);
+
+		/* sample MSB (from slave) on leading edge */
+		word <<= 1;
+		word |= getmiso(spi);
+		setsck(spi, cpol);
+	}
+	return word;
+}
+
+static inline u32
+bitbang_txrx_be_cpha1(struct spi_device *spi,
+		unsigned nsecs, unsigned cpol,
+		u32 word, u8 bits)
+{
+	/* if (cpol == 0) this is SPI_MODE_1; else this is SPI_MODE_3 */
+
+	/* clock starts at inactive polarity */
+	for (word <<= (32 - bits); likely(bits); bits--) {
+
+		/* setup MSB (to slave) on leading edge */
+		setsck(spi, !cpol);
+		setmosi(spi, word & (1 << 31));
+		spidelay(nsecs); /* T(setup) */
+
+		setsck(spi, cpol);
+		spidelay(nsecs);
+
+		/* sample MSB (from slave) on trailing edge */
+		word <<= 1;
+		word |= getmiso(spi);
+	}
+	return word;
+}
+
+#endif	/* EXPAND_BITBANG_TXRX */