summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/net/netlabel.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWaiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>2014-06-23 11:28:51 -0400
committerPaul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>2014-06-23 16:52:55 -0400
commitf31e799459659ae88c341aeac16a8a5efb1271d4 (patch)
tree912cc7f6dd3350c32501a344cf438f7ec2269c72 /include/net/netlabel.h
parent6e51f9cbfa04a92b40e7f9c1e76c8ecbff534a22 (diff)
selinux: no recursive read_lock of policy_rwlock in security_genfs_sid()
With the introduction of fair queued rwlock, recursive read_lock() may hang the offending process if there is a write_lock() somewhere in between. With recursive read_lock checking enabled, the following error was reported: ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 3.16.0-rc1 #2 Tainted: G E --------------------------------------------- load_policy/708 is trying to acquire lock: (policy_rwlock){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff8125b32a>] security_genfs_sid+0x3a/0x170 but task is already holding lock: (policy_rwlock){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff8125b48c>] security_fs_use+0x2c/0x110 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(policy_rwlock); lock(policy_rwlock); This patch fixes the occurrence of recursive read_lock() of policy_rwlock by adding a helper function __security_genfs_sid() which requires caller to take the lock before calling it. The security_fs_use() was then modified to call the new helper function. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com> Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/net/netlabel.h')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions