diff options
| author | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> | 2016-04-27 18:56:21 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2016-05-18 17:06:38 -0700 |
| commit | bb10156f572f06f3b6cadd378e5a0ab3ed8da991 (patch) | |
| tree | 2bc5ca365b3792973f40df38fc687f823fbeb472 /kernel/bpf | |
| parent | 3899251bdb9c2b31fc73d4cc132f52d3710101de (diff) | |
bpf: fix check_map_func_compatibility logic
[ Upstream commit 6aff67c85c9e5a4bc99e5211c1bac547936626ca ]
The commit 35578d798400 ("bpf: Implement function bpf_perf_event_read() that get the selected hardware PMU conuter")
introduced clever way to check bpf_helper<->map_type compatibility.
Later on commit a43eec304259 ("bpf: introduce bpf_perf_event_output() helper") adjusted
the logic and inadvertently broke it.
Get rid of the clever bool compare and go back to two-way check
from map and from helper perspective.
Fixes: a43eec304259 ("bpf: introduce bpf_perf_event_output() helper")
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 53 |
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 5a615c188001..2cbfba78d3db 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -239,15 +239,6 @@ static const char * const reg_type_str[] = { [CONST_IMM] = "imm", }; -static const struct { - int map_type; - int func_id; -} func_limit[] = { - {BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY, BPF_FUNC_tail_call}, - {BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY, BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read}, - {BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY, BPF_FUNC_perf_event_output}, -}; - static void print_verifier_state(struct verifier_env *env) { enum bpf_reg_type t; @@ -898,24 +889,44 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct verifier_env *env, u32 regno, static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_map *map, int func_id) { - bool bool_map, bool_func; - int i; - if (!map) return 0; - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(func_limit); i++) { - bool_map = (map->map_type == func_limit[i].map_type); - bool_func = (func_id == func_limit[i].func_id); - /* only when map & func pair match it can continue. - * don't allow any other map type to be passed into - * the special func; - */ - if (bool_func && bool_map != bool_func) - return -EINVAL; + /* We need a two way check, first is from map perspective ... */ + switch (map->map_type) { + case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY: + if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_tail_call) + goto error; + break; + case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY: + if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read && + func_id != BPF_FUNC_perf_event_output) + goto error; + break; + default: + break; + } + + /* ... and second from the function itself. */ + switch (func_id) { + case BPF_FUNC_tail_call: + if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY) + goto error; + break; + case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read: + case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_output: + if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY) + goto error; + break; + default: + break; } return 0; +error: + verbose("cannot pass map_type %d into func %d\n", + map->map_type, func_id); + return -EINVAL; } static int check_call(struct verifier_env *env, int func_id) |