diff options
author | Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> | 2020-01-07 23:42:24 +0900 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2020-03-12 13:00:09 +0100 |
commit | 4771b3f60633b602ec2d7ca5787a231be8496a06 (patch) | |
tree | 4982ef52bb67b7199141d4a6ca782feb49ea4d4f /kernel/kprobes.c | |
parent | c2a5e97de44adbf4a4b61b5a4e5f3fbc28b19d86 (diff) |
kprobes: Fix optimize_kprobe()/unoptimize_kprobe() cancellation logic
[ Upstream commit e4add247789e4ba5e08ad8256183ce2e211877d4 ]
optimize_kprobe() and unoptimize_kprobe() cancels if a given kprobe
is on the optimizing_list or unoptimizing_list already. However, since
the following commit:
f66c0447cca1 ("kprobes: Set unoptimized flag after unoptimizing code")
modified the update timing of the KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED, it doesn't
work as expected anymore.
The optimized_kprobe could be in the following states:
- [optimizing]: Before inserting jump instruction
op.kp->flags has KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED and
op->list is not empty.
- [optimized]: jump inserted
op.kp->flags has KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED and
op->list is empty.
- [unoptimizing]: Before removing jump instruction (including unused
optprobe)
op.kp->flags has KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED and
op->list is not empty.
- [unoptimized]: jump removed
op.kp->flags doesn't have KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED and
op->list is empty.
Current code mis-expects [unoptimizing] state doesn't have
KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED, and that can cause incorrect results.
To fix this, introduce optprobe_queued_unopt() to distinguish [optimizing]
and [unoptimizing] states and fixes the logic in optimize_kprobe() and
unoptimize_kprobe().
[ mingo: Cleaned up the changelog and the code a bit. ]
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: bristot@redhat.com
Fixes: f66c0447cca1 ("kprobes: Set unoptimized flag after unoptimizing code")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/157840814418.7181.13478003006386303481.stgit@devnote2
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/kprobes.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/kprobes.c | 67 |
1 files changed, 43 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c index 34e28b236d68..2625c241ac00 100644 --- a/kernel/kprobes.c +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c @@ -612,6 +612,18 @@ void wait_for_kprobe_optimizer(void) mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex); } +static bool optprobe_queued_unopt(struct optimized_kprobe *op) +{ + struct optimized_kprobe *_op; + + list_for_each_entry(_op, &unoptimizing_list, list) { + if (op == _op) + return true; + } + + return false; +} + /* Optimize kprobe if p is ready to be optimized */ static void optimize_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) { @@ -633,17 +645,21 @@ static void optimize_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) return; /* Check if it is already optimized. */ - if (op->kp.flags & KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED) + if (op->kp.flags & KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED) { + if (optprobe_queued_unopt(op)) { + /* This is under unoptimizing. Just dequeue the probe */ + list_del_init(&op->list); + } return; + } op->kp.flags |= KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED; - if (!list_empty(&op->list)) - /* This is under unoptimizing. Just dequeue the probe */ - list_del_init(&op->list); - else { - list_add(&op->list, &optimizing_list); - kick_kprobe_optimizer(); - } + /* On unoptimizing/optimizing_list, op must have OPTIMIZED flag */ + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&op->list))) + return; + + list_add(&op->list, &optimizing_list); + kick_kprobe_optimizer(); } /* Short cut to direct unoptimizing */ @@ -665,30 +681,33 @@ static void unoptimize_kprobe(struct kprobe *p, bool force) return; /* This is not an optprobe nor optimized */ op = container_of(p, struct optimized_kprobe, kp); - if (!kprobe_optimized(p)) { - /* Unoptimized or unoptimizing case */ - if (force && !list_empty(&op->list)) { - /* - * Only if this is unoptimizing kprobe and forced, - * forcibly unoptimize it. (No need to unoptimize - * unoptimized kprobe again :) - */ - list_del_init(&op->list); - force_unoptimize_kprobe(op); - } + if (!kprobe_optimized(p)) return; - } if (!list_empty(&op->list)) { - /* Dequeue from the optimization queue */ - list_del_init(&op->list); + if (optprobe_queued_unopt(op)) { + /* Queued in unoptimizing queue */ + if (force) { + /* + * Forcibly unoptimize the kprobe here, and queue it + * in the freeing list for release afterwards. + */ + force_unoptimize_kprobe(op); + list_move(&op->list, &freeing_list); + } + } else { + /* Dequeue from the optimizing queue */ + list_del_init(&op->list); + op->kp.flags &= ~KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED; + } return; } + /* Optimized kprobe case */ - if (force) + if (force) { /* Forcibly update the code: this is a special case */ force_unoptimize_kprobe(op); - else { + } else { list_add(&op->list, &unoptimizing_list); kick_kprobe_optimizer(); } |