diff options
author | Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> | 2016-06-22 18:03:13 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2016-08-10 14:03:32 +0200 |
commit | 772bd008cd9a1d4e8ce566f2edcc61d1c28fcbe5 (patch) | |
tree | e9f5173f0b8e8da227cea1df9f0491cef4932c62 /kernel/sched/fair.c | |
parent | bd425d4bfc7a1a6064dbbadfbac9c7eec0e426ec (diff) |
sched/fair: Make the use of prev_cpu consistent in the wakeup path
In commit:
ac66f5477239 ("sched/numa: Introduce migrate_swap()")
select_task_rq() got a 'cpu' argument to enable overriding of prev_cpu
in special cases (NUMA task swapping).
However, the select_task_rq_fair() helper functions: wake_affine() and
select_idle_sibling(), still use task_cpu(p) directly to work out
prev_cpu, which leads to inconsistencies.
This patch passes prev_cpu (potentially overridden by NUMA code) into
the helper functions to ensure prev_cpu is indeed the same CPU
everywhere in the wakeup path.
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mgalbraith@suse.de
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466615004-3503-3-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched/fair.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/fair.c | 24 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 9f9a4e5bbfa9..d819da68857f 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static u64 sched_vslice(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) } #ifdef CONFIG_SMP -static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int cpu); +static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int cpu); static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p); /* @@ -1512,7 +1512,8 @@ balance: * Call select_idle_sibling to maybe find a better one. */ if (!cur) - env->dst_cpu = select_idle_sibling(env->p, env->dst_cpu); + env->dst_cpu = select_idle_sibling(env->p, env->src_cpu, + env->dst_cpu); assign: task_numa_assign(env, cur, imp); @@ -5101,18 +5102,18 @@ static int wake_wide(struct task_struct *p) return 1; } -static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync) +static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, + int prev_cpu, int sync) { s64 this_load, load; s64 this_eff_load, prev_eff_load; - int idx, this_cpu, prev_cpu; + int idx, this_cpu; struct task_group *tg; unsigned long weight; int balanced; idx = sd->wake_idx; this_cpu = smp_processor_id(); - prev_cpu = task_cpu(p); load = source_load(prev_cpu, idx); this_load = target_load(this_cpu, idx); @@ -5277,11 +5278,10 @@ find_idlest_cpu(struct sched_group *group, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu) /* * Try and locate an idle CPU in the sched_domain. */ -static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target) +static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target) { struct sched_domain *sd; struct sched_group *sg; - int i = task_cpu(p); if (idle_cpu(target)) return target; @@ -5289,8 +5289,8 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target) /* * If the prevous cpu is cache affine and idle, don't be stupid. */ - if (i != target && cpus_share_cache(i, target) && idle_cpu(i)) - return i; + if (prev != target && cpus_share_cache(prev, target) && idle_cpu(prev)) + return prev; /* * Otherwise, iterate the domains and find an eligible idle cpu. @@ -5311,6 +5311,8 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target) for_each_lower_domain(sd) { sg = sd->groups; do { + int i; + if (!cpumask_intersects(sched_group_cpus(sg), tsk_cpus_allowed(p))) goto next; @@ -5419,13 +5421,13 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f if (affine_sd) { sd = NULL; /* Prefer wake_affine over balance flags */ - if (cpu != prev_cpu && wake_affine(affine_sd, p, sync)) + if (cpu != prev_cpu && wake_affine(affine_sd, p, prev_cpu, sync)) new_cpu = cpu; } if (!sd) { if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) /* XXX always ? */ - new_cpu = select_idle_sibling(p, new_cpu); + new_cpu = select_idle_sibling(p, prev_cpu, new_cpu); } else while (sd) { struct sched_group *group; |