diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2014-06-09 14:56:49 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2014-06-09 14:56:49 -0700 |
commit | da85d191f58a44e149a7c07dbae78b3042909798 (patch) | |
tree | 8c6cb59adcbaa9ab269d279fea0a3d5cb2499df2 /kernel/workqueue.c | |
parent | 68a29ef2e3f0edd154c3f5093e3c9ec772e4011f (diff) | |
parent | 015af06e103fa47af29ada0f564301c81d4973b2 (diff) |
Merge branch 'for-3.16' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq
Pull workqueue updates from Tejun Heo:
"Lai simplified worker destruction path and internal workqueue locking
and there are some other minor changes.
Except for the removal of some long-deprecated interfaces which
haven't had any in-kernel user for quite a while, there shouldn't be
any difference to workqueue users"
* 'for-3.16' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq:
kernel/workqueue.c: pr_warning/pr_warn & printk/pr_info
workqueue: remove the confusing POOL_FREEZING
workqueue: rename first_worker() to first_idle_worker()
workqueue: remove unused work_clear_pending()
workqueue: remove unused WORK_CPU_END
workqueue: declare system_highpri_wq
workqueue: use generic attach/detach routine for rescuers
workqueue: separate pool-attaching code out from create_worker()
workqueue: rename manager_mutex to attach_mutex
workqueue: narrow the protection range of manager_mutex
workqueue: convert worker_idr to worker_ida
workqueue: separate iteration role from worker_idr
workqueue: destroy worker directly in the idle timeout handler
workqueue: async worker destruction
workqueue: destroy_worker() should destroy idle workers only
workqueue: use manager lock only to protect worker_idr
workqueue: Remove deprecated system_nrt[_freezable]_wq
workqueue: Remove deprecated flush[_delayed]_work_sync()
kernel/workqueue.c: pr_warning/pr_warn & printk/pr_info
workqueue: simplify wq_update_unbound_numa() by jumping to use_dfl_pwq if the target cpumask equals wq's
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/workqueue.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/workqueue.c | 448 |
1 files changed, 147 insertions, 301 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index a4bab46cd38e..6203d2900877 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -65,15 +65,12 @@ enum { * be executing on any CPU. The pool behaves as an unbound one. * * Note that DISASSOCIATED should be flipped only while holding - * manager_mutex to avoid changing binding state while - * create_worker() is in progress. + * attach_mutex to avoid changing binding state while + * worker_attach_to_pool() is in progress. */ - POOL_MANAGE_WORKERS = 1 << 0, /* need to manage workers */ POOL_DISASSOCIATED = 1 << 2, /* cpu can't serve workers */ - POOL_FREEZING = 1 << 3, /* freeze in progress */ /* worker flags */ - WORKER_STARTED = 1 << 0, /* started */ WORKER_DIE = 1 << 1, /* die die die */ WORKER_IDLE = 1 << 2, /* is idle */ WORKER_PREP = 1 << 3, /* preparing to run works */ @@ -124,8 +121,7 @@ enum { * cpu or grabbing pool->lock is enough for read access. If * POOL_DISASSOCIATED is set, it's identical to L. * - * MG: pool->manager_mutex and pool->lock protected. Writes require both - * locks. Reads can happen under either lock. + * A: pool->attach_mutex protected. * * PL: wq_pool_mutex protected. * @@ -163,8 +159,11 @@ struct worker_pool { /* see manage_workers() for details on the two manager mutexes */ struct mutex manager_arb; /* manager arbitration */ - struct mutex manager_mutex; /* manager exclusion */ - struct idr worker_idr; /* MG: worker IDs and iteration */ + struct mutex attach_mutex; /* attach/detach exclusion */ + struct list_head workers; /* A: attached workers */ + struct completion *detach_completion; /* all workers detached */ + + struct ida worker_ida; /* worker IDs for task name */ struct workqueue_attrs *attrs; /* I: worker attributes */ struct hlist_node hash_node; /* PL: unbound_pool_hash node */ @@ -340,16 +339,6 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to, lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex), \ "sched RCU or wq->mutex should be held") -#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP -#define assert_manager_or_pool_lock(pool) \ - WARN_ONCE(debug_locks && \ - !lockdep_is_held(&(pool)->manager_mutex) && \ - !lockdep_is_held(&(pool)->lock), \ - "pool->manager_mutex or ->lock should be held") -#else -#define assert_manager_or_pool_lock(pool) do { } while (0) -#endif - #define for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu) \ for ((pool) = &per_cpu(cpu_worker_pools, cpu)[0]; \ (pool) < &per_cpu(cpu_worker_pools, cpu)[NR_STD_WORKER_POOLS]; \ @@ -375,17 +364,16 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to, /** * for_each_pool_worker - iterate through all workers of a worker_pool * @worker: iteration cursor - * @wi: integer used for iteration * @pool: worker_pool to iterate workers of * - * This must be called with either @pool->manager_mutex or ->lock held. + * This must be called with @pool->attach_mutex. * * The if/else clause exists only for the lockdep assertion and can be * ignored. */ -#define for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool) \ - idr_for_each_entry(&(pool)->worker_idr, (worker), (wi)) \ - if (({ assert_manager_or_pool_lock((pool)); false; })) { } \ +#define for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) \ + list_for_each_entry((worker), &(pool)->workers, node) \ + if (({ lockdep_assert_held(&pool->attach_mutex); false; })) { } \ else /** @@ -763,13 +751,6 @@ static bool need_to_create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool) return need_more_worker(pool) && !may_start_working(pool); } -/* Do I need to be the manager? */ -static bool need_to_manage_workers(struct worker_pool *pool) -{ - return need_to_create_worker(pool) || - (pool->flags & POOL_MANAGE_WORKERS); -} - /* Do we have too many workers and should some go away? */ static bool too_many_workers(struct worker_pool *pool) { @@ -791,8 +772,8 @@ static bool too_many_workers(struct worker_pool *pool) * Wake up functions. */ -/* Return the first worker. Safe with preemption disabled */ -static struct worker *first_worker(struct worker_pool *pool) +/* Return the first idle worker. Safe with preemption disabled */ +static struct worker *first_idle_worker(struct worker_pool *pool) { if (unlikely(list_empty(&pool->idle_list))) return NULL; @@ -811,7 +792,7 @@ static struct worker *first_worker(struct worker_pool *pool) */ static void wake_up_worker(struct worker_pool *pool) { - struct worker *worker = first_worker(pool); + struct worker *worker = first_idle_worker(pool); if (likely(worker)) wake_up_process(worker->task); @@ -885,7 +866,7 @@ struct task_struct *wq_worker_sleeping(struct task_struct *task, int cpu) */ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&pool->nr_running) && !list_empty(&pool->worklist)) - to_wakeup = first_worker(pool); + to_wakeup = first_idle_worker(pool); return to_wakeup ? to_wakeup->task : NULL; } @@ -1621,70 +1602,6 @@ static void worker_leave_idle(struct worker *worker) list_del_init(&worker->entry); } -/** - * worker_maybe_bind_and_lock - try to bind %current to worker_pool and lock it - * @pool: target worker_pool - * - * Bind %current to the cpu of @pool if it is associated and lock @pool. - * - * Works which are scheduled while the cpu is online must at least be - * scheduled to a worker which is bound to the cpu so that if they are - * flushed from cpu callbacks while cpu is going down, they are - * guaranteed to execute on the cpu. - * - * This function is to be used by unbound workers and rescuers to bind - * themselves to the target cpu and may race with cpu going down or - * coming online. kthread_bind() can't be used because it may put the - * worker to already dead cpu and set_cpus_allowed_ptr() can't be used - * verbatim as it's best effort and blocking and pool may be - * [dis]associated in the meantime. - * - * This function tries set_cpus_allowed() and locks pool and verifies the - * binding against %POOL_DISASSOCIATED which is set during - * %CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and cleared during %CPU_ONLINE, so if the worker - * enters idle state or fetches works without dropping lock, it can - * guarantee the scheduling requirement described in the first paragraph. - * - * CONTEXT: - * Might sleep. Called without any lock but returns with pool->lock - * held. - * - * Return: - * %true if the associated pool is online (@worker is successfully - * bound), %false if offline. - */ -static bool worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(struct worker_pool *pool) -__acquires(&pool->lock) -{ - while (true) { - /* - * The following call may fail, succeed or succeed - * without actually migrating the task to the cpu if - * it races with cpu hotunplug operation. Verify - * against POOL_DISASSOCIATED. - */ - if (!(pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED)) - set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, pool->attrs->cpumask); - - spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); - if (pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED) - return false; - if (task_cpu(current) == pool->cpu && - cpumask_equal(¤t->cpus_allowed, pool->attrs->cpumask)) - return true; - spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); - - /* - * We've raced with CPU hot[un]plug. Give it a breather - * and retry migration. cond_resched() is required here; - * otherwise, we might deadlock against cpu_stop trying to - * bring down the CPU on non-preemptive kernel. - */ - cpu_relax(); - cond_resched(); - } -} - static struct worker *alloc_worker(void) { struct worker *worker; @@ -1693,6 +1610,7 @@ static struct worker *alloc_worker(void) if (worker) { INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->entry); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->scheduled); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->node); /* on creation a worker is in !idle && prep state */ worker->flags = WORKER_PREP; } @@ -1700,12 +1618,68 @@ static struct worker *alloc_worker(void) } /** + * worker_attach_to_pool() - attach a worker to a pool + * @worker: worker to be attached + * @pool: the target pool + * + * Attach @worker to @pool. Once attached, the %WORKER_UNBOUND flag and + * cpu-binding of @worker are kept coordinated with the pool across + * cpu-[un]hotplugs. + */ +static void worker_attach_to_pool(struct worker *worker, + struct worker_pool *pool) +{ + mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex); + + /* + * set_cpus_allowed_ptr() will fail if the cpumask doesn't have any + * online CPUs. It'll be re-applied when any of the CPUs come up. + */ + set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, pool->attrs->cpumask); + + /* + * The pool->attach_mutex ensures %POOL_DISASSOCIATED remains + * stable across this function. See the comments above the + * flag definition for details. + */ + if (pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED) + worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND; + + list_add_tail(&worker->node, &pool->workers); + + mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex); +} + +/** + * worker_detach_from_pool() - detach a worker from its pool + * @worker: worker which is attached to its pool + * @pool: the pool @worker is attached to + * + * Undo the attaching which had been done in worker_attach_to_pool(). The + * caller worker shouldn't access to the pool after detached except it has + * other reference to the pool. + */ +static void worker_detach_from_pool(struct worker *worker, + struct worker_pool *pool) +{ + struct completion *detach_completion = NULL; + + mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex); + list_del(&worker->node); + if (list_empty(&pool->workers)) + detach_completion = pool->detach_completion; + mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex); + + if (detach_completion) + complete(detach_completion); +} + +/** * create_worker - create a new workqueue worker * @pool: pool the new worker will belong to * - * Create a new worker which is bound to @pool. The returned worker - * can be started by calling start_worker() or destroyed using - * destroy_worker(). + * Create a new worker which is attached to @pool. The new worker must be + * started by start_worker(). * * CONTEXT: * Might sleep. Does GFP_KERNEL allocations. @@ -1719,19 +1693,8 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool) int id = -1; char id_buf[16]; - lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex); - - /* - * ID is needed to determine kthread name. Allocate ID first - * without installing the pointer. - */ - idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL); - spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); - - id = idr_alloc(&pool->worker_idr, NULL, 0, 0, GFP_NOWAIT); - - spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); - idr_preload_end(); + /* ID is needed to determine kthread name */ + id = ida_simple_get(&pool->worker_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL); if (id < 0) goto fail; @@ -1758,33 +1721,14 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool) /* prevent userland from meddling with cpumask of workqueue workers */ worker->task->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY; - /* - * set_cpus_allowed_ptr() will fail if the cpumask doesn't have any - * online CPUs. It'll be re-applied when any of the CPUs come up. - */ - set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, pool->attrs->cpumask); - - /* - * The caller is responsible for ensuring %POOL_DISASSOCIATED - * remains stable across this function. See the comments above the - * flag definition for details. - */ - if (pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED) - worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND; - - /* successful, commit the pointer to idr */ - spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); - idr_replace(&pool->worker_idr, worker, worker->id); - spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); + /* successful, attach the worker to the pool */ + worker_attach_to_pool(worker, pool); return worker; fail: - if (id >= 0) { - spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); - idr_remove(&pool->worker_idr, id); - spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); - } + if (id >= 0) + ida_simple_remove(&pool->worker_ida, id); kfree(worker); return NULL; } @@ -1800,7 +1744,6 @@ fail: */ static void start_worker(struct worker *worker) { - worker->flags |= WORKER_STARTED; worker->pool->nr_workers++; worker_enter_idle(worker); wake_up_process(worker->task); @@ -1818,8 +1761,6 @@ static int create_and_start_worker(struct worker_pool *pool) { struct worker *worker; - mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex); - worker = create_worker(pool); if (worker) { spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); @@ -1827,8 +1768,6 @@ static int create_and_start_worker(struct worker_pool *pool) spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); } - mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex); - return worker ? 0 : -ENOMEM; } @@ -1836,46 +1775,30 @@ static int create_and_start_worker(struct worker_pool *pool) * destroy_worker - destroy a workqueue worker * @worker: worker to be destroyed * - * Destroy @worker and adjust @pool stats accordingly. + * Destroy @worker and adjust @pool stats accordingly. The worker should + * be idle. * * CONTEXT: - * spin_lock_irq(pool->lock) which is released and regrabbed. + * spin_lock_irq(pool->lock). */ static void destroy_worker(struct worker *worker) { struct worker_pool *pool = worker->pool; - lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex); lockdep_assert_held(&pool->lock); /* sanity check frenzy */ if (WARN_ON(worker->current_work) || - WARN_ON(!list_empty(&worker->scheduled))) + WARN_ON(!list_empty(&worker->scheduled)) || + WARN_ON(!(worker->flags & WORKER_IDLE))) return; - if (worker->flags & WORKER_STARTED) - pool->nr_workers--; - if (worker->flags & WORKER_IDLE) - pool->nr_idle--; - - /* - * Once WORKER_DIE is set, the kworker may destroy itself at any - * point. Pin to ensure the task stays until we're done with it. - */ - get_task_struct(worker->task); + pool->nr_workers--; + pool->nr_idle--; list_del_init(&worker->entry); worker->flags |= WORKER_DIE; - - idr_remove(&pool->worker_idr, worker->id); - - spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); - - kthread_stop(worker->task); - put_task_struct(worker->task); - kfree(worker); - - spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); + wake_up_process(worker->task); } static void idle_worker_timeout(unsigned long __pool) @@ -1884,7 +1807,7 @@ static void idle_worker_timeout(unsigned long __pool) spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); - if (too_many_workers(pool)) { + while (too_many_workers(pool)) { struct worker *worker; unsigned long expires; @@ -1892,13 +1815,12 @@ static void idle_worker_timeout(unsigned long __pool) worker = list_entry(pool->idle_list.prev, struct worker, entry); expires = worker->last_active + IDLE_WORKER_TIMEOUT; - if (time_before(jiffies, expires)) + if (time_before(jiffies, expires)) { mod_timer(&pool->idle_timer, expires); - else { - /* it's been idle for too long, wake up manager */ - pool->flags |= POOL_MANAGE_WORKERS; - wake_up_worker(pool); + break; } + + destroy_worker(worker); } spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); @@ -2017,44 +1939,6 @@ restart: } /** - * maybe_destroy_worker - destroy workers which have been idle for a while - * @pool: pool to destroy workers for - * - * Destroy @pool workers which have been idle for longer than - * IDLE_WORKER_TIMEOUT. - * - * LOCKING: - * spin_lock_irq(pool->lock) which may be released and regrabbed - * multiple times. Called only from manager. - * - * Return: - * %false if no action was taken and pool->lock stayed locked, %true - * otherwise. - */ -static bool maybe_destroy_workers(struct worker_pool *pool) -{ - bool ret = false; - - while (too_many_workers(pool)) { - struct worker *worker; - unsigned long expires; - - worker = list_entry(pool->idle_list.prev, struct worker, entry); - expires = worker->last_active + IDLE_WORKER_TIMEOUT; - - if (time_before(jiffies, expires)) { - mod_timer(&pool->idle_timer, expires); - break; - } - - destroy_worker(worker); - ret = true; - } - - return ret; -} - -/** * manage_workers - manage worker pool * @worker: self * @@ -2083,8 +1967,6 @@ static bool manage_workers(struct worker *worker) bool ret = false; /* - * Managership is governed by two mutexes - manager_arb and - * manager_mutex. manager_arb handles arbitration of manager role. * Anyone who successfully grabs manager_arb wins the arbitration * and becomes the manager. mutex_trylock() on pool->manager_arb * failure while holding pool->lock reliably indicates that someone @@ -2093,40 +1975,12 @@ static bool manage_workers(struct worker *worker) * grabbing manager_arb is responsible for actually performing * manager duties. If manager_arb is grabbed and released without * actual management, the pool may stall indefinitely. - * - * manager_mutex is used for exclusion of actual management - * operations. The holder of manager_mutex can be sure that none - * of management operations, including creation and destruction of - * workers, won't take place until the mutex is released. Because - * manager_mutex doesn't interfere with manager role arbitration, - * it is guaranteed that the pool's management, while may be - * delayed, won't be disturbed by someone else grabbing - * manager_mutex. */ if (!mutex_trylock(&pool->manager_arb)) return ret; - /* - * With manager arbitration won, manager_mutex would be free in - * most cases. trylock first without dropping @pool->lock. - */ - if (unlikely(!mutex_trylock(&pool->manager_mutex))) { - spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); - mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex); - spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); - ret = true; - } - - pool->flags &= ~POOL_MANAGE_WORKERS; - - /* - * Destroy and then create so that may_start_working() is true - * on return. - */ - ret |= maybe_destroy_workers(pool); ret |= maybe_create_worker(pool); - mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex); mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_arb); return ret; } @@ -2314,6 +2168,11 @@ woke_up: spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&worker->entry)); worker->task->flags &= ~PF_WQ_WORKER; + + set_task_comm(worker->task, "kworker/dying"); + ida_simple_remove(&pool->worker_ida, worker->id); + worker_detach_from_pool(worker, pool); + kfree(worker); return 0; } @@ -2361,9 +2220,6 @@ recheck: worker_set_flags(worker, WORKER_PREP, false); sleep: - if (unlikely(need_to_manage_workers(pool)) && manage_workers(worker)) - goto recheck; - /* * pool->lock is held and there's no work to process and no need to * manage, sleep. Workers are woken up only while holding @@ -2440,8 +2296,9 @@ repeat: spin_unlock_irq(&wq_mayday_lock); - /* migrate to the target cpu if possible */ - worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(pool); + worker_attach_to_pool(rescuer, pool); + + spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); rescuer->pool = pool; /* @@ -2454,6 +2311,11 @@ repeat: move_linked_works(work, scheduled, &n); process_scheduled_works(rescuer); + spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); + + worker_detach_from_pool(rescuer, pool); + + spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); /* * Put the reference grabbed by send_mayday(). @pool won't @@ -3550,9 +3412,10 @@ static int init_worker_pool(struct worker_pool *pool) (unsigned long)pool); mutex_init(&pool->manager_arb); - mutex_init(&pool->manager_mutex); - idr_init(&pool->worker_idr); + mutex_init(&pool->attach_mutex); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->workers); + ida_init(&pool->worker_ida); INIT_HLIST_NODE(&pool->hash_node); pool->refcnt = 1; @@ -3567,7 +3430,7 @@ static void rcu_free_pool(struct rcu_head *rcu) { struct worker_pool *pool = container_of(rcu, struct worker_pool, rcu); - idr_destroy(&pool->worker_idr); + ida_destroy(&pool->worker_ida); free_workqueue_attrs(pool->attrs); kfree(pool); } @@ -3585,6 +3448,7 @@ static void rcu_free_pool(struct rcu_head *rcu) */ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool) { + DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(detach_completion); struct worker *worker; lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex); @@ -3605,18 +3469,24 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool) /* * Become the manager and destroy all workers. Grabbing * manager_arb prevents @pool's workers from blocking on - * manager_mutex. + * attach_mutex. */ mutex_lock(&pool->manager_arb); - mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex); - spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); - while ((worker = first_worker(pool))) + spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); + while ((worker = first_idle_worker(pool))) destroy_worker(worker); WARN_ON(pool->nr_workers || pool->nr_idle); - spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); - mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex); + + mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex); + if (!list_empty(&pool->workers)) + pool->detach_completion = &detach_completion; + mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex); + + if (pool->detach_completion) + wait_for_completion(pool->detach_completion); + mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_arb); /* shut down the timers */ @@ -3662,9 +3532,6 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs) if (!pool || init_worker_pool(pool) < 0) goto fail; - if (workqueue_freezing) - pool->flags |= POOL_FREEZING; - lockdep_set_subclass(&pool->lock, 1); /* see put_pwq() */ copy_workqueue_attrs(pool->attrs, attrs); @@ -3771,7 +3638,12 @@ static void pwq_adjust_max_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq) spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock); - if (!freezable || !(pwq->pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING)) { + /* + * During [un]freezing, the caller is responsible for ensuring that + * this function is called at least once after @workqueue_freezing + * is updated and visible. + */ + if (!freezable || !workqueue_freezing) { pwq->max_active = wq->saved_max_active; while (!list_empty(&pwq->delayed_works) && @@ -4103,17 +3975,13 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu, * Let's determine what needs to be done. If the target cpumask is * different from wq's, we need to compare it to @pwq's and create * a new one if they don't match. If the target cpumask equals - * wq's, the default pwq should be used. If @pwq is already the - * default one, nothing to do; otherwise, install the default one. + * wq's, the default pwq should be used. */ if (wq_calc_node_cpumask(wq->unbound_attrs, node, cpu_off, cpumask)) { if (cpumask_equal(cpumask, pwq->pool->attrs->cpumask)) goto out_unlock; } else { - if (pwq == wq->dfl_pwq) - goto out_unlock; - else - goto use_dfl_pwq; + goto use_dfl_pwq; } mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex); @@ -4121,8 +3989,8 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu, /* create a new pwq */ pwq = alloc_unbound_pwq(wq, target_attrs); if (!pwq) { - pr_warning("workqueue: allocation failed while updating NUMA affinity of \"%s\"\n", - wq->name); + pr_warn("workqueue: allocation failed while updating NUMA affinity of \"%s\"\n", + wq->name); mutex_lock(&wq->mutex); goto use_dfl_pwq; } @@ -4599,28 +4467,27 @@ static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work) int cpu = smp_processor_id(); struct worker_pool *pool; struct worker *worker; - int wi; for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu) { WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu != smp_processor_id()); - mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex); + mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex); spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); /* - * We've blocked all manager operations. Make all workers + * We've blocked all attach/detach operations. Make all workers * unbound and set DISASSOCIATED. Before this, all workers * except for the ones which are still executing works from * before the last CPU down must be on the cpu. After * this, they may become diasporas. */ - for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool) + for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND; pool->flags |= POOL_DISASSOCIATED; spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); - mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex); /* * Call schedule() so that we cross rq->lock and thus can @@ -4660,9 +4527,8 @@ static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work) static void rebind_workers(struct worker_pool *pool) { struct worker *worker; - int wi; - lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex); + lockdep_assert_held(&pool->attach_mutex); /* * Restore CPU affinity of all workers. As all idle workers should @@ -4671,13 +4537,13 @@ static void rebind_workers(struct worker_pool *pool) * of all workers first and then clear UNBOUND. As we're called * from CPU_ONLINE, the following shouldn't fail. */ - for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool) + for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0); spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); - for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool) { + for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) { unsigned int worker_flags = worker->flags; /* @@ -4729,9 +4595,8 @@ static void restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(struct worker_pool *pool, int cpu) { static cpumask_t cpumask; struct worker *worker; - int wi; - lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex); + lockdep_assert_held(&pool->attach_mutex); /* is @cpu allowed for @pool? */ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, pool->attrs->cpumask)) @@ -4743,7 +4608,7 @@ static void restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(struct worker_pool *pool, int cpu) return; /* as we're called from CPU_ONLINE, the following shouldn't fail */ - for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool) + for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0); } @@ -4776,7 +4641,7 @@ static int workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex); for_each_pool(pool, pi) { - mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex); + mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex); if (pool->cpu == cpu) { spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); @@ -4788,7 +4653,7 @@ static int workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(pool, cpu); } - mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex); } /* update NUMA affinity of unbound workqueues */ @@ -4887,24 +4752,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_on_cpu); */ void freeze_workqueues_begin(void) { - struct worker_pool *pool; struct workqueue_struct *wq; struct pool_workqueue *pwq; - int pi; mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex); WARN_ON_ONCE(workqueue_freezing); workqueue_freezing = true; - /* set FREEZING */ - for_each_pool(pool, pi) { - spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); - WARN_ON_ONCE(pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING); - pool->flags |= POOL_FREEZING; - spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); - } - list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) { mutex_lock(&wq->mutex); for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) @@ -4974,21 +4829,13 @@ void thaw_workqueues(void) { struct workqueue_struct *wq; struct pool_workqueue *pwq; - struct worker_pool *pool; - int pi; mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex); if (!workqueue_freezing) goto out_unlock; - /* clear FREEZING */ - for_each_pool(pool, pi) { - spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); - WARN_ON_ONCE(!(pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING)); - pool->flags &= ~POOL_FREEZING; - spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); - } + workqueue_freezing = false; /* restore max_active and repopulate worklist */ list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) { @@ -4998,7 +4845,6 @@ void thaw_workqueues(void) mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex); } - workqueue_freezing = false; out_unlock: mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex); } |