workqueue, freezer: unify spelling of 'freeze' + 'able' to 'freezable'

There are two spellings in use for 'freeze' + 'able' - 'freezable' and
'freezeable'.  The former is the more prominent one.  The latter is
mostly used by workqueue and in a few other odd places.  Unify the
spelling to 'freezable'.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Acked-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Alex Dubov <oakad@yahoo.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

3 files changed, 16 insertions, 16 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/power/main.c b/kernel/power/main.c
index 7b5db6a8561e..701853042c28 100644
--- a/kernel/power/main.c
+++ b/kernel/power/main.c
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_wq);
 
 static int __init pm_start_workqueue(void)
 {
-	pm_wq = alloc_workqueue("pm", WQ_FREEZEABLE, 0);
+	pm_wq = alloc_workqueue("pm", WQ_FREEZABLE, 0);
 
 	return pm_wq ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/power/process.c b/kernel/power/process.c
index d6d2a10320e0..0cf3a27a6c9d 100644
--- a/kernel/power/process.c
+++ b/kernel/power/process.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
  */
 #define TIMEOUT	(20 * HZ)
 
-static inline int freezeable(struct task_struct * p)
+static inline int freezable(struct task_struct * p)
 {
 	if ((p == current) ||
 	    (p->flags & PF_NOFREEZE) ||
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(bool sig_only)
 		todo = 0;
 		read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 		do_each_thread(g, p) {
-			if (frozen(p) || !freezeable(p))
+			if (frozen(p) || !freezable(p))
 				continue;
 
 			if (!freeze_task(p, sig_only))
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static void thaw_tasks(bool nosig_only)
 
 	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 	do_each_thread(g, p) {
-		if (!freezeable(p))
+		if (!freezable(p))
 			continue;
 
 		if (nosig_only && should_send_signal(p))
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 90a17ca2ad0b..88a3e34f51f6 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -2965,7 +2965,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__alloc_workqueue_key(const char *name,
 	 */
 	spin_lock(&workqueue_lock);
 
-	if (workqueue_freezing && wq->flags & WQ_FREEZEABLE)
+	if (workqueue_freezing && wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE)
 		for_each_cwq_cpu(cpu, wq)
 			get_cwq(cpu, wq)->max_active = 0;
 
@@ -3077,7 +3077,7 @@ void workqueue_set_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int max_active)
 
 		spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
 
-		if (!(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZEABLE) ||
+		if (!(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE) ||
 		    !(gcwq->flags & GCWQ_FREEZING))
 			get_cwq(gcwq->cpu, wq)->max_active = max_active;
 
@@ -3327,7 +3327,7 @@ static int __cpuinit trustee_thread(void *__gcwq)
 	 * want to get it over with ASAP - spam rescuers, wake up as
 	 * many idlers as necessary and create new ones till the
 	 * worklist is empty.  Note that if the gcwq is frozen, there
-	 * may be frozen works in freezeable cwqs.  Don't declare
+	 * may be frozen works in freezable cwqs.  Don't declare
 	 * completion while frozen.
 	 */
 	while (gcwq->nr_workers != gcwq->nr_idle ||
@@ -3585,9 +3585,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_on_cpu);
 /**
  * freeze_workqueues_begin - begin freezing workqueues
  *
- * Start freezing workqueues.  After this function returns, all
- * freezeable workqueues will queue new works to their frozen_works
- * list instead of gcwq->worklist.
+ * Start freezing workqueues.  After this function returns, all freezable
+ * workqueues will queue new works to their frozen_works list instead of
+ * gcwq->worklist.
  *
  * CONTEXT:
  * Grabs and releases workqueue_lock and gcwq->lock's.
@@ -3613,7 +3613,7 @@ void freeze_workqueues_begin(void)
 		list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
 			struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_cwq(cpu, wq);
 
-			if (cwq && wq->flags & WQ_FREEZEABLE)
+			if (cwq && wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE)
 				cwq->max_active = 0;
 		}
 
@@ -3624,7 +3624,7 @@ void freeze_workqueues_begin(void)
 }
 
 /**
- * freeze_workqueues_busy - are freezeable workqueues still busy?
+ * freeze_workqueues_busy - are freezable workqueues still busy?
  *
  * Check whether freezing is complete.  This function must be called
  * between freeze_workqueues_begin() and thaw_workqueues().
@@ -3633,8 +3633,8 @@ void freeze_workqueues_begin(void)
  * Grabs and releases workqueue_lock.
  *
  * RETURNS:
- * %true if some freezeable workqueues are still busy.  %false if
- * freezing is complete.
+ * %true if some freezable workqueues are still busy.  %false if freezing
+ * is complete.
  */
 bool freeze_workqueues_busy(void)
 {
@@ -3654,7 +3654,7 @@ bool freeze_workqueues_busy(void)
 		list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
 			struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_cwq(cpu, wq);
 
-			if (!cwq || !(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZEABLE))
+			if (!cwq || !(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE))
 				continue;
 
 			BUG_ON(cwq->nr_active < 0);
@@ -3699,7 +3699,7 @@ void thaw_workqueues(void)
 		list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
 			struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_cwq(cpu, wq);
 
-			if (!cwq || !(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZEABLE))
+			if (!cwq || !(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE))
 				continue;
 
 			/* restore max_active and repopulate worklist */