diff options
| author | Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> | 2012-11-26 16:29:56 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2012-12-03 12:59:14 -0800 |
| commit | beb93b17f27dee8a85db7bf0d882b59cdff4b2a0 (patch) | |
| tree | 7b2d9f71cdb54155efb1f6375875ac4e002a9eda /kernel | |
| parent | 2d7c6b713f9479a02e4a8e7159dc32ad160c8da7 (diff) | |
futex: avoid wake_futex() for a PI futex_q
commit aa10990e028cac3d5e255711fb9fb47e00700e35 upstream.
Dave Jones reported a bug with futex_lock_pi() that his trinity test
exposed. Sometime between queue_me() and taking the q.lock_ptr, the
lock_ptr became NULL, resulting in a crash.
While futex_wake() is careful to not call wake_futex() on futex_q's with
a pi_state or an rt_waiter (which are either waiting for a
futex_unlock_pi() or a PI futex_requeue()), futex_wake_op() and
futex_requeue() do not perform the same test.
Update futex_wake_op() and futex_requeue() to test for q.pi_state and
q.rt_waiter and abort with -EINVAL if detected. To ensure any future
breakage is caught, add a WARN() to wake_futex() if the same condition
is true.
This fix has seen 3 hours of testing with "trinity -c futex" on an
x86_64 VM with 4 CPUS.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: tidy up the WARN()]
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/futex.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c index 01b3c5597f5c..91691e9daabc 100644 --- a/kernel/futex.c +++ b/kernel/futex.c @@ -843,6 +843,9 @@ static void wake_futex(struct futex_q *q) { struct task_struct *p = q->task; + if (WARN(q->pi_state || q->rt_waiter, "refusing to wake PI futex\n")) + return; + /* * We set q->lock_ptr = NULL _before_ we wake up the task. If * a non-futex wake up happens on another CPU then the task @@ -1078,6 +1081,10 @@ retry_private: plist_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, head, list) { if (match_futex (&this->key, &key1)) { + if (this->pi_state || this->rt_waiter) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out_unlock; + } wake_futex(this); if (++ret >= nr_wake) break; @@ -1090,6 +1097,10 @@ retry_private: op_ret = 0; plist_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, head, list) { if (match_futex (&this->key, &key2)) { + if (this->pi_state || this->rt_waiter) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out_unlock; + } wake_futex(this); if (++op_ret >= nr_wake2) break; @@ -1098,6 +1109,7 @@ retry_private: ret += op_ret; } +out_unlock: double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2); out_put_keys: put_futex_key(&key2); @@ -1387,9 +1399,13 @@ retry_private: /* * FUTEX_WAIT_REQEUE_PI and FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI should always * be paired with each other and no other futex ops. + * + * We should never be requeueing a futex_q with a pi_state, + * which is awaiting a futex_unlock_pi(). */ if ((requeue_pi && !this->rt_waiter) || - (!requeue_pi && this->rt_waiter)) { + (!requeue_pi && this->rt_waiter) || + this->pi_state) { ret = -EINVAL; break; } |