diff options
| author | Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> | 2017-09-20 13:12:20 -0600 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> | 2017-09-25 08:56:05 -0600 |
| commit | 5acb3cc2c2e9d3020a4fee43763c6463767f1572 (patch) | |
| tree | 0d650e446e8e7ef738e3d2237b6778fb6ef447a4 /kernel | |
| parent | 1dae69bedeeca0b57e441eae491fbd38049c0b47 (diff) | |
blktrace: Fix potential deadlock between delete & sysfs ops
The lockdep code had reported the following unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(s_active#228);
lock(&bdev->bd_mutex/1);
lock(s_active#228);
lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
The deadlock may happen when one task (CPU1) is trying to delete a
partition in a block device and another task (CPU0) is accessing
tracing sysfs file (e.g. /sys/block/dm-1/trace/act_mask) in that
partition.
The s_active isn't an actual lock. It is a reference count (kn->count)
on the sysfs (kernfs) file. Removal of a sysfs file, however, require
a wait until all the references are gone. The reference count is
treated like a rwsem using lockdep instrumentation code.
The fact that a thread is in the sysfs callback method or in the
ioctl call means there is a reference to the opended sysfs or device
file. That should prevent the underlying block structure from being
removed.
Instead of using bd_mutex in the block_device structure, a new
blk_trace_mutex is now added to the request_queue structure to protect
access to the blk_trace structure.
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Fix typo in patch subject line, and prune a comment detailing how
the code used to work.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c index 2a685b45b73b..45a3928544ce 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c @@ -648,6 +648,12 @@ int blk_trace_startstop(struct request_queue *q, int start) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_trace_startstop); +/* + * When reading or writing the blktrace sysfs files, the references to the + * opened sysfs or device files should prevent the underlying block device + * from being removed. So no further delete protection is really needed. + */ + /** * blk_trace_ioctl: - handle the ioctls associated with tracing * @bdev: the block device @@ -665,7 +671,7 @@ int blk_trace_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, unsigned cmd, char __user *arg) if (!q) return -ENXIO; - mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex); + mutex_lock(&q->blk_trace_mutex); switch (cmd) { case BLKTRACESETUP: @@ -691,7 +697,7 @@ int blk_trace_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, unsigned cmd, char __user *arg) break; } - mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&q->blk_trace_mutex); return ret; } @@ -1727,7 +1733,7 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_blk_trace_attr_show(struct device *dev, if (q == NULL) goto out_bdput; - mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex); + mutex_lock(&q->blk_trace_mutex); if (attr == &dev_attr_enable) { ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", !!q->blk_trace); @@ -1746,7 +1752,7 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_blk_trace_attr_show(struct device *dev, ret = sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", q->blk_trace->end_lba); out_unlock_bdev: - mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&q->blk_trace_mutex); out_bdput: bdput(bdev); out: @@ -1788,7 +1794,7 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_blk_trace_attr_store(struct device *dev, if (q == NULL) goto out_bdput; - mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex); + mutex_lock(&q->blk_trace_mutex); if (attr == &dev_attr_enable) { if (value) @@ -1814,7 +1820,7 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_blk_trace_attr_store(struct device *dev, } out_unlock_bdev: - mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&q->blk_trace_mutex); out_bdput: bdput(bdev); out: |