diff options
| author | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> | 2015-12-21 18:17:10 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2016-01-06 11:01:07 +0100 |
| commit | 093e5840ae76f1082633503964d035f40ed0216d (patch) | |
| tree | 81af673ff32ea6a7b1220e3c1c8f96e9ebb6a856 /kernel | |
| parent | be958bdc96f18bc1356177bbb79d46ea0c037b96 (diff) | |
sched/core: Reset task's lockless wake-queues on fork()
In the following commit:
7675104990ed ("sched: Implement lockless wake-queues")
we gained lockless wake-queues.
The -RT kernel managed to lockup itself with those. There could be multiple
attempts for task X to enqueue it for a wakeup _even_ if task X is already
running.
The reason is that task X could be runnable but not yet on CPU. The the
task performing the wakeup did not leave the CPU it could performe
multiple wakeups.
With the proper timming task X could be running and enqueued for a
wakeup. If this happens while X is performing a fork() then its its
child will have a !NULL `wake_q` member copied.
This is not a problem as long as the child task does not participate in
lockless wakeups :)
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 7675104990ed ("sched: Implement lockless wake-queues")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151221171710.GA5499@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/fork.c | 1 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c index fce002ee3ddf..1155eac61687 100644 --- a/kernel/fork.c +++ b/kernel/fork.c @@ -380,6 +380,7 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig) #endif tsk->splice_pipe = NULL; tsk->task_frag.page = NULL; + tsk->wake_q.next = NULL; account_kernel_stack(ti, 1); |