diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2013-07-02 19:53:30 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2013-07-02 19:53:30 -0700 |
commit | f317ff9eed763e99bd226a447f93d42509434f43 (patch) | |
tree | d77edfcdb1e7c32c30327f50dce04bcff8ec1531 /kernel | |
parent | 13cc56013842a847a0f6ff805d9ed9181e753ef8 (diff) | |
parent | a85f1a41f020bc2c97611060bcfae6f48a1db28d (diff) |
Merge branch 'for-3.11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq
Pull workqueue changes from Tejun Heo:
"Surprisingly, Lai and I didn't break too many things implementing
custom pools and stuff last time around and there aren't any follow-up
changes necessary at this point.
The only change in this pull request is Viresh's patches to make some
per-cpu workqueues to behave as unbound workqueues dependent on a boot
param whose default can be configured via a config option. This leads
to higher processing overhead / lower bandwidth as more work items are
bounced across CPUs; however, it can lead to noticeable powersave in
certain configurations - ~10% w/ idlish constant workload on a
big.LITTLE configuration according to Viresh.
This is because per-cpu workqueues interfere with how the scheduler
perceives whether or not each CPU is idle by forcing pinned tasks on
them, which makes the scheduler's power-aware scheduling decisions
less effective.
Its effectiveness is likely less pronounced on homogenous
configurations and this type of optimization can probably be made
automatic; however, the changes are pretty minimal and the affected
workqueues are clearly marked, so it's an easy gain for some
configurations for the time being with pretty unintrusive changes."
* 'for-3.11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq:
fbcon: queue work on power efficient wq
block: queue work on power efficient wq
PHYLIB: queue work on system_power_efficient_wq
workqueue: Add system wide power_efficient workqueues
workqueues: Introduce new flag WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT for power oriented workqueues
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/power/Kconfig | 20 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/workqueue.c | 26 |
2 files changed, 45 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/power/Kconfig b/kernel/power/Kconfig index 9c39de095ba9..d444c4e834f4 100644 --- a/kernel/power/Kconfig +++ b/kernel/power/Kconfig @@ -262,6 +262,26 @@ config PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS bool depends on PM +config WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT_DEFAULT + bool "Enable workqueue power-efficient mode by default" + depends on PM + default n + help + Per-cpu workqueues are generally preferred because they show + better performance thanks to cache locality; unfortunately, + per-cpu workqueues tend to be more power hungry than unbound + workqueues. + + Enabling workqueue.power_efficient kernel parameter makes the + per-cpu workqueues which were observed to contribute + significantly to power consumption unbound, leading to measurably + lower power usage at the cost of small performance overhead. + + This config option determines whether workqueue.power_efficient + is enabled by default. + + If in doubt, say N. + config PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_SLEEP def_bool y depends on PM_SLEEP && PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index ee8e29a2320c..f02c4a4a0c3c 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -272,6 +272,15 @@ static cpumask_var_t *wq_numa_possible_cpumask; static bool wq_disable_numa; module_param_named(disable_numa, wq_disable_numa, bool, 0444); +/* see the comment above the definition of WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT */ +#ifdef CONFIG_WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT_DEFAULT +static bool wq_power_efficient = true; +#else +static bool wq_power_efficient; +#endif + +module_param_named(power_efficient, wq_power_efficient, bool, 0444); + static bool wq_numa_enabled; /* unbound NUMA affinity enabled */ /* buf for wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs(), protected by CPU hotplug exclusion */ @@ -305,6 +314,10 @@ struct workqueue_struct *system_unbound_wq __read_mostly; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(system_unbound_wq); struct workqueue_struct *system_freezable_wq __read_mostly; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(system_freezable_wq); +struct workqueue_struct *system_power_efficient_wq __read_mostly; +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(system_power_efficient_wq); +struct workqueue_struct *system_freezable_power_efficient_wq __read_mostly; +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(system_freezable_power_efficient_wq); static int worker_thread(void *__worker); static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to, @@ -4086,6 +4099,10 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__alloc_workqueue_key(const char *fmt, struct workqueue_struct *wq; struct pool_workqueue *pwq; + /* see the comment above the definition of WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT */ + if ((flags & WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT) && wq_power_efficient) + flags |= WQ_UNBOUND; + /* allocate wq and format name */ if (flags & WQ_UNBOUND) tbl_size = wq_numa_tbl_len * sizeof(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[0]); @@ -4985,8 +5002,15 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void) WQ_UNBOUND_MAX_ACTIVE); system_freezable_wq = alloc_workqueue("events_freezable", WQ_FREEZABLE, 0); + system_power_efficient_wq = alloc_workqueue("events_power_efficient", + WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT, 0); + system_freezable_power_efficient_wq = alloc_workqueue("events_freezable_power_efficient", + WQ_FREEZABLE | WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT, + 0); BUG_ON(!system_wq || !system_highpri_wq || !system_long_wq || - !system_unbound_wq || !system_freezable_wq); + !system_unbound_wq || !system_freezable_wq || + !system_power_efficient_wq || + !system_freezable_power_efficient_wq); return 0; } early_initcall(init_workqueues); |