diff options
| author | KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> | 2010-03-05 13:41:47 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2010-03-06 11:26:24 -0800 |
| commit | 76ca542d880ebe59a7a03c1597e73e1ded271857 (patch) | |
| tree | d5e1a5dc88150ccbfeba811769ac066021b3041b /mm/page_alloc.c | |
| parent | 84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26 (diff) | |
mm, lockdep: annotate reclaim context to zone reclaim too
Commit cf40bd16fd ("lockdep: annotate reclaim context") introduced reclaim
context annotation. But it didn't annotate zone reclaim. This patch do
it.
The point is, commit cf40bd16fd annotate __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim but
zone-reclaim doesn't use __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim.
current call graph is
__alloc_pages_nodemask
get_page_from_freelist
zone_reclaim()
__alloc_pages_slowpath
__alloc_pages_direct_reclaim
try_to_free_pages
Actually, if zone_reclaim_mode=1, VM never call
__alloc_pages_direct_reclaim in usual VM pressure.
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/page_alloc.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions