summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/tipc/link.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJon Paul Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>2014-02-13 17:29:11 -0500
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2014-02-13 17:57:06 -0500
commitf006c9c70fda4676157e00caa2efa74646709d72 (patch)
treec2322f4588d384427812068086d7cb6511d39e84 /net/tipc/link.c
parent1dab3d5ac22217241ca5c5bb7d0132602b465938 (diff)
tipc: change reception of tunnelled failover packets
When a link is reset, and there is a redundant link available, all sender sockets will steer their subsequent traffic through the remaining link. In order to guarantee preserved packet order and cardinality during the transition, we tunnel the failing link's send queue through the remaining link before we allow any sockets to use it. In this commit, we change the algorithm for receiving failover ("ORIGINAL_MSG") packets in tipc_link_tunnel_rcv(), at the same time delegating it to a new subfuncton, tipc_link_failover_rcv(). Instead of directly returning an extracted inner packet to the packet reception loop in tipc_rcv(), we first check if it is a message fragment, in which case we append it to the reset link's fragment chain. If the fragment chain is complete, we return the whole chain instead of the individual buffer, eliminating any need for the tipc_rcv() loop to do reassembly of tunneled packets. This change makes it possible to further simplify tipc_link_tunnel_rcv(), as well as the calling tipc_rcv() loop. We will do that in later commits. It also makes it possible to identify a single spot in the code where we can tell that a failover procedure is finished, something that is useful when we are deleting links after a failover. This will also be done in a later commit. Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/tipc/link.c')
-rw-r--r--net/tipc/link.c75
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c
index f227a389e36e..26a54f4f3c63 100644
--- a/net/tipc/link.c
+++ b/net/tipc/link.c
@@ -2124,6 +2124,50 @@ static void tipc_link_dup_rcv(struct tipc_link *l_ptr,
link_handle_out_of_seq_msg(l_ptr, buf);
}
+/* tipc_link_failover_rcv(): Receive a tunnelled ORIGINAL_MSG packet
+ * Owner node is locked.
+ */
+static struct sk_buff *tipc_link_failover_rcv(struct tipc_link *l_ptr,
+ struct sk_buff *t_buf)
+{
+ struct tipc_msg *t_msg = buf_msg(t_buf);
+ struct sk_buff *buf = NULL;
+ struct tipc_msg *msg;
+
+ if (tipc_link_is_up(l_ptr))
+ tipc_link_reset(l_ptr);
+
+ /* First failover packet? */
+ if (l_ptr->exp_msg_count == START_CHANGEOVER)
+ l_ptr->exp_msg_count = msg_msgcnt(t_msg);
+
+ /* Should there be an inner packet? */
+ if (l_ptr->exp_msg_count) {
+ l_ptr->exp_msg_count--;
+ buf = buf_extract(t_buf, INT_H_SIZE);
+ if (buf == NULL) {
+ pr_warn("%sno inner failover pkt\n", link_co_err);
+ goto exit;
+ }
+ msg = buf_msg(buf);
+
+ if (less(msg_seqno(msg), l_ptr->reset_checkpoint)) {
+ kfree_skb(buf);
+ buf = NULL;
+ goto exit;
+ }
+ if (msg_user(msg) == MSG_FRAGMENTER) {
+ l_ptr->stats.recv_fragments++;
+ tipc_link_frag_rcv(&l_ptr->reasm_head,
+ &l_ptr->reasm_tail,
+ &buf);
+ }
+ }
+
+exit:
+ return buf;
+}
+
/* tipc_link_tunnel_rcv(): Receive a tunnelled packet, sent
* via other link as result of a failover (ORIGINAL_MSG) or
* a new active link (DUPLICATE_MSG). Failover packets are
@@ -2135,10 +2179,8 @@ static int tipc_link_tunnel_rcv(struct tipc_link **l_ptr,
{
struct sk_buff *tunnel_buf = *buf;
struct tipc_link *dest_link;
- struct tipc_msg *msg;
struct tipc_msg *tunnel_msg = buf_msg(tunnel_buf);
u32 msg_typ = msg_type(tunnel_msg);
- u32 msg_count = msg_msgcnt(tunnel_msg);
u32 bearer_id = msg_bearer_id(tunnel_msg);
if (bearer_id >= MAX_BEARERS)
@@ -2153,42 +2195,19 @@ static int tipc_link_tunnel_rcv(struct tipc_link **l_ptr,
goto exit;
}
*l_ptr = dest_link;
- msg = msg_get_wrapped(tunnel_msg);
if (msg_typ == DUPLICATE_MSG) {
tipc_link_dup_rcv(dest_link, tunnel_buf);
goto exit;
}
- /* First original message ?: */
- if (tipc_link_is_up(dest_link)) {
- pr_info("%s<%s>, changeover initiated by peer\n", link_rst_msg,
- dest_link->name);
- tipc_link_reset(dest_link);
- dest_link->exp_msg_count = msg_count;
- if (!msg_count)
- goto exit;
- } else if (dest_link->exp_msg_count == START_CHANGEOVER) {
- dest_link->exp_msg_count = msg_count;
- if (!msg_count)
- goto exit;
- }
+ if (msg_type(tunnel_msg) == ORIGINAL_MSG) {
+ *buf = tipc_link_failover_rcv(dest_link, tunnel_buf);
- /* Receive original message */
- if (dest_link->exp_msg_count == 0) {
- pr_warn("%sgot too many tunnelled messages\n", link_co_err);
- goto exit;
- }
- dest_link->exp_msg_count--;
- if (less(msg_seqno(msg), dest_link->reset_checkpoint)) {
- goto exit;
- } else {
- *buf = buf_extract(tunnel_buf, INT_H_SIZE);
+ /* Do we have a buffer/buffer chain to return? */
if (*buf != NULL) {
kfree_skb(tunnel_buf);
return 1;
- } else {
- pr_warn("%soriginal msg dropped\n", link_co_err);
}
}
exit: