diff options
author | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> | 2007-02-09 23:25:21 +0900 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@sunset.davemloft.net> | 2007-02-10 23:20:15 -0800 |
commit | c43072852649d8382b81237ce51195bcec36f24a (patch) | |
tree | 5e55d65bd4d1db35418d2990310bd2c765d60405 /net/tipc/net.c | |
parent | cca5172a7ec10dfdb0b787cd8e9d5b0b8f179793 (diff) |
[NET] TIPC: Fix whitespace errors.
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/tipc/net.c')
-rw-r--r-- | net/tipc/net.c | 74 |
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 37 deletions
diff --git a/net/tipc/net.c b/net/tipc/net.c index a991bf8a7f74..c39c76201e8e 100644 --- a/net/tipc/net.c +++ b/net/tipc/net.c @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ /* * net/tipc/net.c: TIPC network routing code - * + * * Copyright (c) 1995-2006, Ericsson AB * Copyright (c) 2005, Wind River Systems * All rights reserved. @@ -49,63 +49,63 @@ #include "discover.h" #include "config.h" -/* +/* * The TIPC locking policy is designed to ensure a very fine locking * granularity, permitting complete parallel access to individual - * port and node/link instances. The code consists of three major + * port and node/link instances. The code consists of three major * locking domains, each protected with their own disjunct set of locks. * * 1: The routing hierarchy. - * Comprises the structures 'zone', 'cluster', 'node', 'link' - * and 'bearer'. The whole hierarchy is protected by a big - * read/write lock, tipc_net_lock, to enssure that nothing is added - * or removed while code is accessing any of these structures. - * This layer must not be called from the two others while they + * Comprises the structures 'zone', 'cluster', 'node', 'link' + * and 'bearer'. The whole hierarchy is protected by a big + * read/write lock, tipc_net_lock, to enssure that nothing is added + * or removed while code is accessing any of these structures. + * This layer must not be called from the two others while they * hold any of their own locks. * Neither must it itself do any upcalls to the other two before * it has released tipc_net_lock and other protective locks. * - * Within the tipc_net_lock domain there are two sub-domains;'node' and + * Within the tipc_net_lock domain there are two sub-domains;'node' and * 'bearer', where local write operations are permitted, * provided that those are protected by individual spin_locks - * per instance. Code holding tipc_net_lock(read) and a node spin_lock + * per instance. Code holding tipc_net_lock(read) and a node spin_lock * is permitted to poke around in both the node itself and its - * subordinate links. I.e, it can update link counters and queues, - * change link state, send protocol messages, and alter the - * "active_links" array in the node; but it can _not_ remove a link + * subordinate links. I.e, it can update link counters and queues, + * change link state, send protocol messages, and alter the + * "active_links" array in the node; but it can _not_ remove a link * or a node from the overall structure. - * Correspondingly, individual bearers may change status within a - * tipc_net_lock(read), protected by an individual spin_lock ber bearer + * Correspondingly, individual bearers may change status within a + * tipc_net_lock(read), protected by an individual spin_lock ber bearer * instance, but it needs tipc_net_lock(write) to remove/add any bearers. - * * - * 2: The transport level of the protocol. - * This consists of the structures port, (and its user level - * representations, such as user_port and tipc_sock), reference and - * tipc_user (port.c, reg.c, socket.c). + * + * 2: The transport level of the protocol. + * This consists of the structures port, (and its user level + * representations, such as user_port and tipc_sock), reference and + * tipc_user (port.c, reg.c, socket.c). * * This layer has four different locks: * - The tipc_port spin_lock. This is protecting each port instance - * from parallel data access and removal. Since we can not place - * this lock in the port itself, it has been placed in the + * from parallel data access and removal. Since we can not place + * this lock in the port itself, it has been placed in the * corresponding reference table entry, which has the same life - * cycle as the module. This entry is difficult to access from - * outside the TIPC core, however, so a pointer to the lock has - * been added in the port instance, -to be used for unlocking + * cycle as the module. This entry is difficult to access from + * outside the TIPC core, however, so a pointer to the lock has + * been added in the port instance, -to be used for unlocking * only. - * - A read/write lock to protect the reference table itself (teg.c). - * (Nobody is using read-only access to this, so it can just as + * - A read/write lock to protect the reference table itself (teg.c). + * (Nobody is using read-only access to this, so it can just as * well be changed to a spin_lock) * - A spin lock to protect the registry of kernel/driver users (reg.c) - * - A global spin_lock (tipc_port_lock), which only task is to ensure + * - A global spin_lock (tipc_port_lock), which only task is to ensure * consistency where more than one port is involved in an operation, * i.e., whe a port is part of a linked list of ports. * There are two such lists; 'port_list', which is used for management, * and 'wait_list', which is used to queue ports during congestion. - * + * * 3: The name table (name_table.c, name_distr.c, subscription.c) - * - There is one big read/write-lock (tipc_nametbl_lock) protecting the - * overall name table structure. Nothing must be added/removed to + * - There is one big read/write-lock (tipc_nametbl_lock) protecting the + * overall name table structure. Nothing must be added/removed to * this structure without holding write access to it. * - There is one local spin_lock per sub_sequence, which can be seen * as a sub-domain to the tipc_nametbl_lock domain. It is used only @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ DEFINE_RWLOCK(tipc_net_lock); struct network tipc_net = { NULL }; -struct node *tipc_net_select_remote_node(u32 addr, u32 ref) +struct node *tipc_net_select_remote_node(u32 addr, u32 ref) { return tipc_zone_select_remote_node(tipc_net.zones[tipc_zone(addr)], addr, ref); } @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ void tipc_net_route_msg(struct sk_buff *buf) buf_discard(buf); } else { msg_dbg(msg, "NET>REJ>:"); - tipc_reject_msg(buf, msg_destport(msg) ? + tipc_reject_msg(buf, msg_destport(msg) ? TIPC_ERR_NO_PORT : TIPC_ERR_NO_NAME); } return; @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ void tipc_net_route_msg(struct sk_buff *buf) dnode = msg_short(msg) ? tipc_own_addr : msg_destnode(msg); if (in_scope(dnode, tipc_own_addr)) { if (msg_isdata(msg)) { - if (msg_mcast(msg)) + if (msg_mcast(msg)) tipc_port_recv_mcast(buf, NULL); else if (msg_destport(msg)) tipc_port_recv_msg(buf); @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ int tipc_net_start(void) (res = tipc_bclink_init())) { return res; } - tipc_subscr_stop(); + tipc_subscr_stop(); tipc_cfg_stop(); tipc_k_signal((Handler)tipc_subscr_start, 0); tipc_k_signal((Handler)tipc_cfg_init, 0); @@ -298,12 +298,12 @@ void tipc_net_stop(void) { if (tipc_mode != TIPC_NET_MODE) return; - write_lock_bh(&tipc_net_lock); + write_lock_bh(&tipc_net_lock); tipc_bearer_stop(); tipc_mode = TIPC_NODE_MODE; tipc_bclink_stop(); net_stop(); - write_unlock_bh(&tipc_net_lock); + write_unlock_bh(&tipc_net_lock); info("Left network mode \n"); } |