diff options
| author | Todd Seidelmann <tseidelmann@linode.com> | 2019-08-14 10:54:16 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> | 2019-08-19 09:34:20 +0200 |
| commit | f20faa06d83de440bec8e200870784c3458793c4 (patch) | |
| tree | 35d3a5abd7aefb54687cb329e2cb35e97156e51a /net | |
| parent | 0d7342c3637462fc6291b392ced9af0f4ca4dab4 (diff) | |
netfilter: ebtables: Fix argument order to ADD_COUNTER
The ordering of arguments to the x_tables ADD_COUNTER macro
appears to be wrong in ebtables (cf. ip_tables.c, ip6_tables.c,
and arp_tables.c).
This causes data corruption in the ebtables userspace tools
because they get incorrect packet & byte counts from the kernel.
Fixes: d72133e628803 ("netfilter: ebtables: use ADD_COUNTER macro")
Signed-off-by: Todd Seidelmann <tseidelmann@linode.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c index c8177a89f52c..4096d8a74a2b 100644 --- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c +++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ unsigned int ebt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb, return NF_DROP; } - ADD_COUNTER(*(counter_base + i), 1, skb->len); + ADD_COUNTER(*(counter_base + i), skb->len, 1); /* these should only watch: not modify, nor tell us * what to do with the packet @@ -959,8 +959,8 @@ static void get_counters(const struct ebt_counter *oldcounters, continue; counter_base = COUNTER_BASE(oldcounters, nentries, cpu); for (i = 0; i < nentries; i++) - ADD_COUNTER(counters[i], counter_base[i].pcnt, - counter_base[i].bcnt); + ADD_COUNTER(counters[i], counter_base[i].bcnt, + counter_base[i].pcnt); } } @@ -1280,7 +1280,7 @@ static int do_update_counters(struct net *net, const char *name, /* we add to the counters of the first cpu */ for (i = 0; i < num_counters; i++) - ADD_COUNTER(t->private->counters[i], tmp[i].pcnt, tmp[i].bcnt); + ADD_COUNTER(t->private->counters[i], tmp[i].bcnt, tmp[i].pcnt); write_unlock_bh(&t->lock); ret = 0; |