diff options
| author | Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> | 2015-03-16 12:19:24 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2015-03-17 15:03:54 -0400 |
| commit | cb7cf8a33ff73cf638481d1edf883d8968f934f8 (patch) | |
| tree | 701453315595e733e89c80ce04a0b6d1532faafe /net | |
| parent | 37355565ba57fd45f78f0934305be2761b641f8f (diff) | |
inet: Clean up inet_csk_wait_for_connect() vs. might_sleep()
I got the following trace with current net-next kernel :
[14723.885290] WARNING: CPU: 26 PID: 22658 at kernel/sched/core.c:7285 __might_sleep+0x89/0xa0()
[14723.885325] do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at [<ffffffff810e8734>] prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x34/0xa0
[14723.885355] CPU: 26 PID: 22658 Comm: netserver Not tainted 4.0.0-dbg-DEV #1379
[14723.885359] ffffffff81a223a8 ffff881fae9e7ca8 ffffffff81650b5d 0000000000000001
[14723.885364] ffff881fae9e7cf8 ffff881fae9e7ce8 ffffffff810a72e7 0000000000000000
[14723.885367] ffffffff81a57620 000000000000093a 0000000000000000 ffff881fae9e7e64
[14723.885371] Call Trace:
[14723.885377] [<ffffffff81650b5d>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[14723.885382] [<ffffffff810a72e7>] warn_slowpath_common+0x97/0xe0
[14723.885386] [<ffffffff810a73e6>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
[14723.885390] [<ffffffff810f4c5d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10d/0x1d0
[14723.885393] [<ffffffff810e8734>] ? prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x34/0xa0
[14723.885396] [<ffffffff810e8734>] ? prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x34/0xa0
[14723.885399] [<ffffffff810ccdc9>] __might_sleep+0x89/0xa0
[14723.885403] [<ffffffff81581846>] lock_sock_nested+0x36/0xb0
[14723.885406] [<ffffffff815829a3>] ? release_sock+0x173/0x1c0
[14723.885411] [<ffffffff815ea1f7>] inet_csk_accept+0x157/0x2a0
[14723.885415] [<ffffffff810e8900>] ? abort_exclusive_wait+0xc0/0xc0
[14723.885419] [<ffffffff8161b96d>] inet_accept+0x2d/0x150
[14723.885424] [<ffffffff8157db6f>] SYSC_accept4+0xff/0x210
[14723.885428] [<ffffffff8165a451>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x44
[14723.885431] [<ffffffff810f4c5d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10d/0x1d0
[14723.885437] [<ffffffff81369c0e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[14723.885441] [<ffffffff8157ef40>] SyS_accept+0x10/0x20
[14723.885444] [<ffffffff81659872>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
[14723.885447] ---[ end trace ff74cd83355b1873 ]---
In commit 26cabd31259ba43f68026ce3f62b78094124333f
Peter added a sched_annotate_sleep() in sk_wait_event()
Is the following patch needed as well ?
Alternative would be to use sk_wait_event() from inet_csk_wait_for_connect()
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 1 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c index 14d02ea905b6..3e44b9b0b78e 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c @@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ static int inet_csk_wait_for_connect(struct sock *sk, long timeo) release_sock(sk); if (reqsk_queue_empty(&icsk->icsk_accept_queue)) timeo = schedule_timeout(timeo); + sched_annotate_sleep(); lock_sock(sk); err = 0; if (!reqsk_queue_empty(&icsk->icsk_accept_queue)) |