summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/sound/core/seq
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>2016-02-15 16:20:24 +0100
committerSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>2016-03-04 10:25:43 -0500
commitd26d8b485d21ecc9e466b2a1e02c5962e46624de (patch)
treebff5089820094389429f6274df64daa36ef0b57a /sound/core/seq
parent712394523149ed77377fcc9a264ac35245bd16a3 (diff)
ALSA: seq: Fix leak of pool buffer at concurrent writes
[ Upstream commit d99a36f4728fcbcc501b78447f625bdcce15b842 ] When multiple concurrent writes happen on the ALSA sequencer device right after the open, it may try to allocate vmalloc buffer for each write and leak some of them. It's because the presence check and the assignment of the buffer is done outside the spinlock for the pool. The fix is to move the check and the assignment into the spinlock. (The current implementation is suboptimal, as there can be multiple unnecessary vmallocs because the allocation is done before the check in the spinlock. But the pool size is already checked beforehand, so this isn't a big problem; that is, the only possible path is the multiple writes before any pool assignment, and practically seen, the current coverage should be "good enough".) The issue was triggered by syzkaller fuzzer. BugLink: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CACT4Y+bSzazpXNvtAr=WXaL8hptqjHwqEyFA+VN2AWEx=aurkg@mail.gmail.com Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'sound/core/seq')
-rw-r--r--sound/core/seq/seq_memory.c13
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/sound/core/seq/seq_memory.c b/sound/core/seq/seq_memory.c
index 801076687bb1..c850345c43b5 100644
--- a/sound/core/seq/seq_memory.c
+++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_memory.c
@@ -383,15 +383,20 @@ int snd_seq_pool_init(struct snd_seq_pool *pool)
if (snd_BUG_ON(!pool))
return -EINVAL;
- if (pool->ptr) /* should be atomic? */
- return 0;
- pool->ptr = vmalloc(sizeof(struct snd_seq_event_cell) * pool->size);
- if (!pool->ptr)
+ cellptr = vmalloc(sizeof(struct snd_seq_event_cell) * pool->size);
+ if (!cellptr)
return -ENOMEM;
/* add new cells to the free cell list */
spin_lock_irqsave(&pool->lock, flags);
+ if (pool->ptr) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pool->lock, flags);
+ vfree(cellptr);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ pool->ptr = cellptr;
pool->free = NULL;
for (cell = 0; cell < pool->size; cell++) {