summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/perf
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>2009-08-09 04:19:15 +0200
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2009-08-09 13:07:46 +0200
commitc0a8865e32c8d1a562db38e06ef31ef23282f646 (patch)
tree8cf7a402e4012998166287135204c201c6a83acd /tools/perf
parent183f3b0887083d36c8a25cd5e3518906415d1889 (diff)
perf tools: callchain: Fix bad rounding of minimum rate
Sometimes we get callchain branches that have a rate under the limit given by the user. Say you launched: perf record -f -g -a ./hackbench 10 perf report -g fractal,10.0 And you got: 2.33% hackbench [kernel] [k] _spin_lock_irqsave | |--78.57%-- remove_wait_queue | poll_freewait | do_sys_poll | sys_poll | sysenter_dispatch | 0xf7ffa430 | 0x1ffadea3c | |--7.14%-- __up_read | up_read | do_page_fault | page_fault | 0xf7ffa430 | 0xa0df710000000a ... It is abnormal to get a 7.14% branch whereas we passed a 10% filter. The problem is that we round down the minimum threshold. This happens mostly when we have very low number of events. If the total amount of your branch is 4 and you have a subranch of 3 events, filtering to 90% will be computed like follows: limit = 4 * 0.9; The result is about 3.6, but the cast to integer will round down to 3. It means that our filter is actually of 75% We must then explicitly round up the minimum threshold. Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: acme@redhat.com Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: efault@gmx.de LKML-Reference: <20090809024235.GA10146@nowhere> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf')
-rw-r--r--tools/perf/util/callchain.c5
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/callchain.c b/tools/perf/util/callchain.c
index a8e67aa9ef49..011473411642 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/callchain.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/callchain.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <errno.h>
+#include <math.h>
#include "callchain.h"
@@ -112,7 +113,7 @@ static void __sort_chain_graph_rel(struct callchain_node *node,
u64 min_hit;
node->rb_root = RB_ROOT;
- min_hit = node->children_hit * min_percent / 100.0;
+ min_hit = ceil(node->children_hit * min_percent);
chain_for_each_child(child, node) {
__sort_chain_graph_rel(child, min_percent);
@@ -126,7 +127,7 @@ static void
sort_chain_graph_rel(struct rb_root *rb_root, struct callchain_node *chain_root,
u64 min_hit __used, struct callchain_param *param)
{
- __sort_chain_graph_rel(chain_root, param->min_percent);
+ __sort_chain_graph_rel(chain_root, param->min_percent / 100.0);
rb_root->rb_node = chain_root->rb_root.rb_node;
}