diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 46 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 1 |
3 files changed, 45 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h index 8d9ea8a4f229..ee8c6290c421 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 { /* Index into per_cpu list: */ u16 cpu_index; u32 microcode; + /* Address space bits used by the cache internally */ + u8 x86_cache_bits; }; #define X86_VENDOR_INTEL 0 @@ -175,7 +177,7 @@ extern void cpu_detect(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c); static inline unsigned long long l1tf_pfn_limit(void) { - return BIT_ULL(boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits - 1 - PAGE_SHIFT); + return BIT_ULL(boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_bits - 1 - PAGE_SHIFT); } extern void early_cpu_init(void); diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c index 5acf477e8025..8103adacbc83 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -651,6 +651,45 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(l1tf_mitigation); enum vmx_l1d_flush_state l1tf_vmx_mitigation = VMENTER_L1D_FLUSH_AUTO; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(l1tf_vmx_mitigation); +/* + * These CPUs all support 44bits physical address space internally in the + * cache but CPUID can report a smaller number of physical address bits. + * + * The L1TF mitigation uses the top most address bit for the inversion of + * non present PTEs. When the installed memory reaches into the top most + * address bit due to memory holes, which has been observed on machines + * which report 36bits physical address bits and have 32G RAM installed, + * then the mitigation range check in l1tf_select_mitigation() triggers. + * This is a false positive because the mitigation is still possible due to + * the fact that the cache uses 44bit internally. Use the cache bits + * instead of the reported physical bits and adjust them on the affected + * machines to 44bit if the reported bits are less than 44. + */ +static void override_cache_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) +{ + if (c->x86 != 6) + return; + + switch (c->x86_model) { + case INTEL_FAM6_NEHALEM: + case INTEL_FAM6_WESTMERE: + case INTEL_FAM6_SANDYBRIDGE: + case INTEL_FAM6_IVYBRIDGE: + case INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_CORE: + case INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_ULT: + case INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_GT3E: + case INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_CORE: + case INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_GT3E: + case INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_MOBILE: + case INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_DESKTOP: + case INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_MOBILE: + case INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_DESKTOP: + if (c->x86_cache_bits < 44) + c->x86_cache_bits = 44; + break; + } +} + static void __init l1tf_select_mitigation(void) { u64 half_pa; @@ -658,6 +697,8 @@ static void __init l1tf_select_mitigation(void) if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_L1TF)) return; + override_cache_bits(&boot_cpu_data); + switch (l1tf_mitigation) { case L1TF_MITIGATION_OFF: case L1TF_MITIGATION_FLUSH_NOWARN: @@ -677,11 +718,6 @@ static void __init l1tf_select_mitigation(void) return; #endif - /* - * This is extremely unlikely to happen because almost all - * systems have far more MAX_PA/2 than RAM can be fit into - * DIMM slots. - */ half_pa = (u64)l1tf_pfn_limit() << PAGE_SHIFT; if (e820_any_mapped(half_pa, ULLONG_MAX - half_pa, E820_RAM)) { pr_warn("System has more than MAX_PA/2 memory. L1TF mitigation not effective.\n"); diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c index 13471b71bec7..dc0850bb74be 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c @@ -882,6 +882,7 @@ static void identify_cpu_without_cpuid(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) } } #endif + c->x86_cache_bits = c->x86_phys_bits; } static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_id cpu_no_speculation[] = { |