diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/vm/locking | 130 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 130 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/vm/locking b/Documentation/vm/locking deleted file mode 100644 index f61228bd6395..000000000000 --- a/Documentation/vm/locking +++ /dev/null @@ -1,130 +0,0 @@ -Started Oct 1999 by Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@yahoo.com> - -The intent of this file is to have an uptodate, running commentary -from different people about how locking and synchronization is done -in the Linux vm code. - -page_table_lock & mmap_sem --------------------------------------- - -Page stealers pick processes out of the process pool and scan for -the best process to steal pages from. To guarantee the existence -of the victim mm, a mm_count inc and a mmdrop are done in swap_out(). -Page stealers hold kernel_lock to protect against a bunch of races. -The vma list of the victim mm is also scanned by the stealer, -and the page_table_lock is used to preserve list sanity against the -process adding/deleting to the list. This also guarantees existence -of the vma. Vma existence is not guaranteed once try_to_swap_out() -drops the page_table_lock. To guarantee the existence of the underlying -file structure, a get_file is done before the swapout() method is -invoked. The page passed into swapout() is guaranteed not to be reused -for a different purpose because the page reference count due to being -present in the user's pte is not released till after swapout() returns. - -Any code that modifies the vmlist, or the vm_start/vm_end/ -vm_flags:VM_LOCKED/vm_next of any vma *in the list* must prevent -kswapd from looking at the chain. - -The rules are: -1. To scan the vmlist (look but don't touch) you must hold the - mmap_sem with read bias, i.e. down_read(&mm->mmap_sem) -2. To modify the vmlist you need to hold the mmap_sem with - read&write bias, i.e. down_write(&mm->mmap_sem) *AND* - you need to take the page_table_lock. -3. The swapper takes _just_ the page_table_lock, this is done - because the mmap_sem can be an extremely long lived lock - and the swapper just cannot sleep on that. -4. The exception to this rule is expand_stack, which just - takes the read lock and the page_table_lock, this is ok - because it doesn't really modify fields anybody relies on. -5. You must be able to guarantee that while holding page_table_lock - or page_table_lock of mm A, you will not try to get either lock - for mm B. - -The caveats are: -1. find_vma() makes use of, and updates, the mmap_cache pointer hint. -The update of mmap_cache is racy (page stealer can race with other code -that invokes find_vma with mmap_sem held), but that is okay, since it -is a hint. This can be fixed, if desired, by having find_vma grab the -page_table_lock. - - -Code that add/delete elements from the vmlist chain are -1. callers of insert_vm_struct -2. callers of merge_segments -3. callers of avl_remove - -Code that changes vm_start/vm_end/vm_flags:VM_LOCKED of vma's on -the list: -1. expand_stack -2. mprotect -3. mlock -4. mremap - -It is advisable that changes to vm_start/vm_end be protected, although -in some cases it is not really needed. Eg, vm_start is modified by -expand_stack(), it is hard to come up with a destructive scenario without -having the vmlist protection in this case. - -The page_table_lock nests with the inode i_mmap_mutex and the kmem cache -c_spinlock spinlocks. This is okay, since the kmem code asks for pages after -dropping c_spinlock. The page_table_lock also nests with pagecache_lock and -pagemap_lru_lock spinlocks, and no code asks for memory with these locks -held. - -The page_table_lock is grabbed while holding the kernel_lock spinning monitor. - -The page_table_lock is a spin lock. - -Note: PTL can also be used to guarantee that no new clones using the -mm start up ... this is a loose form of stability on mm_users. For -example, it is used in copy_mm to protect against a racing tlb_gather_mmu -single address space optimization, so that the zap_page_range (from -truncate) does not lose sending ipi's to cloned threads that might -be spawned underneath it and go to user mode to drag in pte's into tlbs. - -swap_lock --------------- -The swap devices are chained in priority order from the "swap_list" header. -The "swap_list" is used for the round-robin swaphandle allocation strategy. -The #free swaphandles is maintained in "nr_swap_pages". These two together -are protected by the swap_lock. - -The swap_lock also protects all the device reference counts on the -corresponding swaphandles, maintained in the "swap_map" array, and the -"highest_bit" and "lowest_bit" fields. - -The swap_lock is a spinlock, and is never acquired from intr level. - -To prevent races between swap space deletion or async readahead swapins -deciding whether a swap handle is being used, ie worthy of being read in -from disk, and an unmap -> swap_free making the handle unused, the swap -delete and readahead code grabs a temp reference on the swaphandle to -prevent warning messages from swap_duplicate <- read_swap_cache_async. - -Swap cache locking ------------------- -Pages are added into the swap cache with kernel_lock held, to make sure -that multiple pages are not being added (and hence lost) by associating -all of them with the same swaphandle. - -Pages are guaranteed not to be removed from the scache if the page is -"shared": ie, other processes hold reference on the page or the associated -swap handle. The only code that does not follow this rule is shrink_mmap, -which deletes pages from the swap cache if no process has a reference on -the page (multiple processes might have references on the corresponding -swap handle though). lookup_swap_cache() races with shrink_mmap, when -establishing a reference on a scache page, so, it must check whether the -page it located is still in the swapcache, or shrink_mmap deleted it. -(This race is due to the fact that shrink_mmap looks at the page ref -count with pagecache_lock, but then drops pagecache_lock before deleting -the page from the scache). - -do_wp_page and do_swap_page have MP races in them while trying to figure -out whether a page is "shared", by looking at the page_count + swap_count. -To preserve the sum of the counts, the page lock _must_ be acquired before -calling is_page_shared (else processes might switch their swap_count refs -to the page count refs, after the page count ref has been snapshotted). - -Swap device deletion code currently breaks all the scache assumptions, -since it grabs neither mmap_sem nor page_table_lock. |