2 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
index 08a1ed1cb5d8..47a539c7642d 100644
--- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
@@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ They provide type safety, have no length limitations, no formatting
 limitations, and under gcc they are as cheap as macros.
 
 Macros should only be used for cases where a static inline is clearly
-suboptimal [there a few, isolated cases of this in fast paths],
+suboptimal [there are a few, isolated cases of this in fast paths],
 or where it is impossible to use a static inline function [such as
 string-izing].
 
diff --git a/Documentation/unaligned-memory-access.txt b/Documentation/unaligned-memory-access.txt
index 6223eace3c09..b0472ac5226a 100644
--- a/Documentation/unaligned-memory-access.txt
+++ b/Documentation/unaligned-memory-access.txt
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ here; a summary of the common scenarios is presented below:
    unaligned access to be corrected.
  - Some architectures are not capable of unaligned memory access, but will
    silently perform a different memory access to the one that was requested,
-   resulting a a subtle code bug that is hard to detect!
+   resulting in a subtle code bug that is hard to detect!
 
 It should be obvious from the above that if your code causes unaligned
 memory accesses to happen, your code will not work correctly on certain
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ memory and you wish to avoid unaligned access, its usage is as follows:
 
 	u32 value = get_unaligned((u32 *) data);
 
-These macros work work for memory accesses of any length (not just 32 bits as
+These macros work for memory accesses of any length (not just 32 bits as
 in the examples above). Be aware that when compared to standard access of
 aligned memory, using these macros to access unaligned memory can be costly in
 terms of performance.