diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/mips/math-emu/dsemul.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/mips/math-emu/dsemul.c | 172 |
1 files changed, 172 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/mips/math-emu/dsemul.c b/arch/mips/math-emu/dsemul.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..aa989c2246da --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/mips/math-emu/dsemul.c @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@ +#include <linux/compiler.h> +#include <linux/mm.h> +#include <linux/signal.h> +#include <linux/smp.h> +#include <linux/smp_lock.h> + +#include <asm/asm.h> +#include <asm/bootinfo.h> +#include <asm/byteorder.h> +#include <asm/cpu.h> +#include <asm/inst.h> +#include <asm/processor.h> +#include <asm/uaccess.h> +#include <asm/branch.h> +#include <asm/mipsregs.h> +#include <asm/system.h> +#include <asm/cacheflush.h> + +#include <asm/fpu_emulator.h> + +#include "ieee754.h" +#include "dsemul.h" + +/* Strap kernel emulator for full MIPS IV emulation */ + +#ifdef __mips +#undef __mips +#endif +#define __mips 4 + +extern struct mips_fpu_emulator_private fpuemuprivate; + + +/* + * Emulate the arbritrary instruction ir at xcp->cp0_epc. Required when + * we have to emulate the instruction in a COP1 branch delay slot. Do + * not change cp0_epc due to the instruction + * + * According to the spec: + * 1) it shouldnt be a branch :-) + * 2) it can be a COP instruction :-( + * 3) if we are tring to run a protected memory space we must take + * special care on memory access instructions :-( + */ + +/* + * "Trampoline" return routine to catch exception following + * execution of delay-slot instruction execution. + */ + +struct emuframe { + mips_instruction emul; + mips_instruction badinst; + mips_instruction cookie; + gpreg_t epc; +}; + +int mips_dsemul(struct pt_regs *regs, mips_instruction ir, gpreg_t cpc) +{ + extern asmlinkage void handle_dsemulret(void); + mips_instruction *dsemul_insns; + struct emuframe *fr; + int err; + + if (ir == 0) { /* a nop is easy */ + regs->cp0_epc = cpc; + regs->cp0_cause &= ~CAUSEF_BD; + return 0; + } +#ifdef DSEMUL_TRACE + printk("dsemul %lx %lx\n", regs->cp0_epc, cpc); + +#endif + + /* + * The strategy is to push the instruction onto the user stack + * and put a trap after it which we can catch and jump to + * the required address any alternative apart from full + * instruction emulation!!. + * + * Algorithmics used a system call instruction, and + * borrowed that vector. MIPS/Linux version is a bit + * more heavyweight in the interests of portability and + * multiprocessor support. For Linux we generate a + * an unaligned access and force an address error exception. + * + * For embedded systems (stand-alone) we prefer to use a + * non-existing CP1 instruction. This prevents us from emulating + * branches, but gives us a cleaner interface to the exception + * handler (single entry point). + */ + + /* Ensure that the two instructions are in the same cache line */ + dsemul_insns = (mips_instruction *) REG_TO_VA ((regs->regs[29] - sizeof(struct emuframe)) & ~0x7); + fr = (struct emuframe *) dsemul_insns; + + /* Verify that the stack pointer is not competely insane */ + if (unlikely(!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, fr, sizeof(struct emuframe)))) + return SIGBUS; + + err = __put_user(ir, &fr->emul); + err |= __put_user((mips_instruction)BADINST, &fr->badinst); + err |= __put_user((mips_instruction)BD_COOKIE, &fr->cookie); + err |= __put_user(cpc, &fr->epc); + + if (unlikely(err)) { + fpuemuprivate.stats.errors++; + return SIGBUS; + } + + regs->cp0_epc = VA_TO_REG & fr->emul; + + flush_cache_sigtramp((unsigned long)&fr->badinst); + + return SIGILL; /* force out of emulation loop */ +} + +int do_dsemulret(struct pt_regs *xcp) +{ + struct emuframe *fr; + gpreg_t epc; + u32 insn, cookie; + int err = 0; + + fr = (struct emuframe *) (xcp->cp0_epc - sizeof(mips_instruction)); + + /* + * If we can't even access the area, something is very wrong, but we'll + * leave that to the default handling + */ + if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, fr, sizeof(struct emuframe))) + return 0; + + /* + * Do some sanity checking on the stackframe: + * + * - Is the instruction pointed to by the EPC an BADINST? + * - Is the following memory word the BD_COOKIE? + */ + err = __get_user(insn, &fr->badinst); + err |= __get_user(cookie, &fr->cookie); + + if (unlikely(err || (insn != BADINST) || (cookie != BD_COOKIE))) { + fpuemuprivate.stats.errors++; + return 0; + } + + /* + * At this point, we are satisfied that it's a BD emulation trap. Yes, + * a user might have deliberately put two malformed and useless + * instructions in a row in his program, in which case he's in for a + * nasty surprise - the next instruction will be treated as a + * continuation address! Alas, this seems to be the only way that we + * can handle signals, recursion, and longjmps() in the context of + * emulating the branch delay instruction. + */ + +#ifdef DSEMUL_TRACE + printk("dsemulret\n"); +#endif + if (__get_user(epc, &fr->epc)) { /* Saved EPC */ + /* This is not a good situation to be in */ + force_sig(SIGBUS, current); + + return 0; + } + + /* Set EPC to return to post-branch instruction */ + xcp->cp0_epc = epc; + + return 1; +} |