| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Fix both instances.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
|
|
Similar to the new optional 'i2c-bus' subnode from Jon Hunter, this
adds an optional 'i2c-mux' subnode, for similar reasons. I.e. it is
bad of the i2c mux core to assume that any subnode of an i2c mux device
is a potential (when the 'reg' property matches) i2c-mux child bus,
given that i2c mux devices might do more than mux i2c traffic.
So, if an 'i2c-mux' subnode is present, dictate that all i2c-mux child
buses exist beneath that subnode.
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
|
|
Filenames of devictree binding documentation seems to be arbitrary and
for me it is unneeded hazzle to find the corresponding documentation for
a specific driver.
Naming the description the same as the driver is a lot easier and makes
sense to me since the driver defines the binding it understands.
Also, remove a reference in one source to the binding documentation, since path
information easily gets stale.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wolfram@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
|
