| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
|
|
Commit 7c63984b86 (ARM: do not define VMALLOC_END relative to PAGE_OFFSET)
changed VMALLOC_END to be an explicit value. Before this, it was
relative to PAGE_OFFSET and therefore converted to unsigned long
as PAGE_OFFSET is an unsigned long. This introduced the following
build warning. Fix this by changing the explicit defines of
VMALLOC_END to be unsigned long.
CC arch/arm/mm/init.o
arch/arm/mm/init.c: In function 'mem_init':
arch/arm/mm/init.c:606: warning: format '%08lx' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 12 has type 'unsigned int'
Signed-off-by: Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@ti.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-K <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.dee>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
VMALLOC_END is supposed to be an absolute value, while PAGE_OFFSET may
vary depending on the selected user:kernel memory split mode through
CONFIG_VMSPLIT_*. In fact, the goal of moving PAGE_OFFSET down is to
accommodate more directly addressed RAM by the kernel below the vmalloc
area, and having VMALLOC_END move along PAGE_OFFSET is rather against
the very reason why PAGE_OFFSET can be moved in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
|
|
This just leaves include/asm-arm/plat-* to deal with.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
