| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The ibm,powerpc-cpu-features device tree binding describes CPU features with
ASCII names and extensible compatibility, privilege, and enablement metadata
that allows improved flexibility and compatibility with new hardware.
The interface is described in detail in ibm,powerpc-cpu-features.txt in this
patch.
Currently this code is not enabled by default, and there are no released
firmwares that provide the binding.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
Anton says: In commit 4db7327194db ("powerpc: Add option to use jump
label for cpu_has_feature()") and commit c12e6f24d413 ("powerpc: Add
option to use jump label for mmu_has_feature()") we added:
BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(feature))
to cpu_has_feature() and mmu_has_feature() in order to catch usage
issues (such as cpu_has_feature(cpu_has_feature(X), which has happened
once in the past). Unfortunately LLVM isn't smart enough to resolve
this, and it errors out.
I work around it in my clang/LLVM builds of the kernel, but I have just
discovered that it causes a lot of issues for the bcc (eBPF) trace tool
(which uses LLVM).
For now just #ifdef it away for clang builds.
Fixes: 4db7327194db ("powerpc: Add option to use jump label for cpu_has_feature()")
Fixes: c12e6f24d413 ("powerpc: Add option to use jump label for mmu_has_feature()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.8+
Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
The number of CPU feature keys is meant to map 1:1 to the number of CPU
feature flags defined in cputable.h, and the latter must fit in an
unsigned long.
In commit 4db7327194db ("powerpc: Add option to use jump label for
cpu_has_feature()"), I incorrectly defined NUM_CPU_FTR_KEYS to 64.
There should be no real adverse consequences of this bug, other than us
allocating too many keys.
Fix it by using BITS_PER_LONG.
Fixes: 4db7327194db ("powerpc: Add option to use jump label for cpu_has_feature()")
Tested-by: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
This allows us to catch incorrect usage of cpu_has_feature() and
mmu_has_feature() prior to jump labels being initialised.
mpe: Use printk() and dump_stack() rather than WARN_ON(), because
WARN_ON() may not work this early in boot. Rename the Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
As we just did for CPU features.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
We do binary patching of asm code using CPU features, which is a
one-time operation, done during early boot. However checks of CPU
features in C code are currently done at run time, even though the set
of CPU features can never change after boot.
We can optimise this by using jump labels to implement cpu_has_feature(),
meaning checks in C code are binary patched into a single nop or branch.
For a C sequence along the lines of:
if (cpu_has_feature(FOO))
return 2;
The generated code before is roughly:
ld r9,-27640(r2)
ld r9,0(r9)
lwz r9,32(r9)
cmpwi cr7,r9,0
bge cr7, 1f
li r3,2
blr
1: ...
After (true):
nop
li r3,2
blr
After (false):
b 1f
li r3,2
blr
1: ...
mpe: Rename MAX_CPU_FEATURES as we already have a #define with that
name, and define it simply as a constant, rather than doing tricks with
sizeof and NULL pointers. Rename the array to cpu_feature_keys. Use the
kconfig we added to guard it. Add BUILD_BUG_ON() if the feature is not a
compile time constant. Rewrite the change log.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
We plan to use jump label for cpu_has_feature(). In order to implement
this we need to include the linux/jump_label.h in asm/cputable.h.
Unfortunately if we do that it leads to an include loop. The root of the
problem seems to be that reg.h needs cputable.h (for CPU_FTRs), and then
cputable.h via jump_label.h eventually pulls in hw_irq.h which needs
reg.h (for MSR_EE).
So move cpu_has_feature() to a separate file on its own.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[mpe: Rename to cpu_has_feature.h and flesh out change log]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
