| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Since the MT9V022_TOTAL_SHUTTER_WIDTH register is controlled in manual
mode by V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE control, it shouldn't be written directly in
mt9v022_s_crop(). In manual mode this register should be set to the
V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE control value. Changing this register directly and
outside of the actual control function means that the register value
is not in sync with the corresponding control value. Thus, the following
problem is observed:
- setting this control initially succeeds
- VIDIOC_S_CROP ioctl() overwrites the MT9V022_TOTAL_SHUTTER_WIDTH
register
- setting this control to the same value again doesn't
result in setting the register since the control value
was previously cached and doesn't differ
Remove MT9V022_TOTAL_SHUTTER_WIDTH register setting in mt9v022_s_crop()
and add a comment explaining why it is not needed in manual mode.
Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
|
|
Write-only ioctls should have a const argument in the ioctl op.
Do this conversion for vidioc_s_crop.
Adding const for write-only ioctls was decided during the 2012 Media Workshop.
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
|
|
Driver for mt9v022 camera sensor is fully compatible for mt9v024 camera sensor
with the exception of several registers which have been changed addresses.
mt9v024 also has improved and additional features, but they are currently not in use.
Signed-off-by: Alex Gershgorin <alexg@meprolight.com>
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
|
|
Several client drivers access the hardware at probe time, for instance
to read the probe chip ID. Such chips need to be powered up when being
probed.
soc-camera handles this by powering chips up in the soc-camera probe
implementation. However, this will break with non soc-camera hosts that
don't perform the same operations.
Fix the problem by pushing the power up/down from the soc-camera core
down to individual drivers on a needs basis.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
|
|
Instead of forcing all soc-camera drivers to go through the mid-layer to
handle power management, create soc_camera_power_[on|off]() functions
that can be called from the subdev .s_power() operation to manage
regulators and platform-specific power handling. This allows non
soc-camera hosts to use soc-camera-aware clients.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
[g.liakhovetski@gmx.de: fix compile breakage]
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
|
|
Move all soc_camera i2c drivers into drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
|
