summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2013-02-28btrfs: remove a printk from scan_one_deviceDavid Sterba
Dave pointed out that he saw messages from btrfs although there was no such filesystem on his computers. The automatic device scan is called on every new blockdevice if the usual distro udev rule set is used. The printk introduced in 6f60cbd3ae442c was a remainder from copying portions of code from btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb which is used under different conditions and the warning makes sense there. Reported-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-26btrfs: cleanup for open-coded alignmentQu Wenruo
Though most of the btrfs codes are using ALIGN macro for page alignment, there are still some codes using open-coded alignment like the following: ------ u64 mask = ((u64)root->stripesize - 1); u64 ret = (val + mask) & ~mask; ------ Or even hidden one: ------ num_bytes = (end - start + blocksize) & ~(blocksize - 1); ------ Sometimes these open-coded alignment is not so easy to understand for newbie like me. This commit changes the open-coded alignment to the ALIGN macro for a better readability. Also there is a previous patch from David Sterba with similar changes, but the patch is for 3.2 kernel and seems not merged. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg12747.html Cc: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-20Btrfs: fix max chunk size on raid5/6Chris Mason
We try to limit the size of a chunk to 10GB, which keeps the unit of work reasonable during balance and resize operations. The limit checks were taking into account the number of copies of the data we had but what they really should be doing is comparing against the logical size of the chunk we're creating. This moves the code around a little to use the count of data stripes from raid5/6. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-02-20btrfs: Init io_lock after cloning btrfs device structThomas Gleixner
__btrfs_close_devices() clones btrfs device structs with memcpy(). Some of the fields in the clone are reinitialized, but it's missing to init io_lock. In mainline this goes unnoticed, but on RT it leaves the plist pointing to the original about to be freed lock struct. Initialize io_lock after cloning, so no references to the original struct are left. Reported-and-tested-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-02-20Merge branch 'raid56-experimental' into for-linus-3.9Chris Mason
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> Conflicts: fs/btrfs/ctree.h fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c fs/btrfs/inode.c fs/btrfs/volumes.c
2013-02-20btrfs: define BTRFS_MAGIC as a u64 valueZach Brown
super.magic is an le64 but it's treated as an unterminated string when compared against BTRFS_MAGIC which is defined as a string. Instead define BTRFS_MAGIC as a normal hex value and use endian helpers to compare it to the super's magic. I tested this by mounting an fs made before the change and made sure that it didn't introduce sparse errors. This matches a similar cleanup that is pending in btrfs-progs. David Sterba pointed out that we should fix the kernel side as well :). Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-20Btrfs: allow for selecting only completely empty chunksIlya Dryomov
Enhance balance usage filter by making it possible to balance out only completely empty chunks. Today, usage filter properly acts on values from 1 to 99 inclusive, usage=100 selects all chunks, and usage=0 selects no chunks. This commit changes the usage=0 case: the new meaning is to restripe only completely empty chunks and nothing else. Suggested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-20Btrfs: eliminate a use-after-free in btrfs_balance()Ilya Dryomov
Commit 5af3e8cc introduced a use-after-free at volumes.c:3139: bctl is freed above in __cancel_balance() in all cases except for balance pause. Fix this by moving the offending check a couple statements above, the meaning of the check is preserved. Reported-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-20btrfs: ensure we don't overrun devices_info[] in __btrfs_alloc_chunkEric Sandeen
WARN_ON isn't enough, we need to stop the loop if for any reason we would overrun the devices_info array. I tried to track down the connection between the length of the alloc_devices list and the rw_devices counter but it wasn't immediately obvious, so be defensive about it. Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-20Btrfs: remove extent mapping if we fail to add chunkJosef Bacik
I got a double free error when unmounting a file system that failed to add a chunk during its operation. This is because we will kfree the mapping that we created but leave the extent_map in the em_tree for chunks. So to fix this just remove the extent_map when we error out so we don't run into this problem. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-20Btrfs: fix chunk allocation error handlingJosef Bacik
If we error out allocating a dev extent we will have already created the block group and such which will cause problems since the allocator may have tried to allocate out of the block group that no longer exists. This will cause BUG_ON()'s in the bio submission path. This also makes a failure to allocate a dev extent a non-abort error, we will just clean up the dev extents we did allocate and exit. Now if we fail to delete the dev extents we will abort since we can't have half of the dev extents hanging around, but this will make us much less likely to abort. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-20Btrfs: use seqlock to protect fs_info->avail_{data, metadata, system}_alloc_bitsMiao Xie
There is no lock to protect fs_info->avail_{data, metadata, system}_alloc_bits, it may introduce some problem, such as the wrong profile information, so we add a seqlock to protect them. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-20Btrfs: make raid attr array more readableMiao Xie
The current code of raid attr arry is hard to understand and it is easy to introduce some problem if we modify the array. So I changed it and made it more readable. Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-15btrfs: access superblock via pagecache in scan_one_deviceDavid Sterba
btrfs_scan_one_device is calling set_blocksize() which can race with a concurrent process making dirty page cache pages. It can end up dropping dirty page cache pages on the floor, which isn't very nice when someone is just running btrfs dev scan to find filesystems on the box. Now that udev is registering btrfs devices as it discovers them, we can actually end up racing with our own mkfs program too. When this happens, we drop some of the important blocks written by mkfs. This commit changes scan_one_device to read the super out of the page cache instead of trying to use bread. This way we don't have to care about the blocksize of the device. This also drops the invalidate_bdev() call. It wasn't very polite to invalidate during the scan either. mkfs is putting the super into the page cache, there's no reason to invalidate at this point. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-02-05Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next.git ↵Chris Mason
for-chris into for-linus
2013-02-05Merge branch 'for-linus' into raid56-experimentalChris Mason
Conflicts: fs/btrfs/volumes.c Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-02-05Btrfs: remove conflicting check for minimum number of devices in raid56Chris Mason
The device removal code was incorrectly checking against two different limits for raid5 and raid6. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-02-01Btrfs: RAID5 and RAID6David Woodhouse
This builds on David Woodhouse's original Btrfs raid5/6 implementation. The code has changed quite a bit, blame Chris Mason for any bugs. Read/modify/write is done after the higher levels of the filesystem have prepared a given bio. This means the higher layers are not responsible for building full stripes, and they don't need to query for the topology of the extents that may get allocated during delayed allocation runs. It also means different files can easily share the same stripe. But, it does expose us to incorrect parity if we crash or lose power while doing a read/modify/write cycle. This will be addressed in a later commit. Scrub is unable to repair crc errors on raid5/6 chunks. Discard does not work on raid5/6 (yet) The stripe size is fixed at 64KiB per disk. This will be tunable in a later commit. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-02-01btrfs: don't try to notify udev about missing devicesEric Sandeen
If we remove a missing device, bdev is null, and if we send that off to btrfs_kobject_uevent we'll panic. Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-01-24Btrfs: fix wrong max device number for single profileMiao Xie
The max device number of single profile is 1, not 0 (0 means 'as many as possible'). Fix it. Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-01-21Btrfs: fix a regression in balance usage filterIlya Dryomov
Commit 3fed40cc ("Btrfs: cleanup duplicated division functions"), which was merged into 3.8-rc1, has introduced a regression by removing logic that was guarding us against bad user input. Bring it back. Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-01-20Btrfs: bring back balance pause/resume logicIlya Dryomov
Balance pause/resume logic got broken by 5ac00add (went in into 3.8-rc1 as part of dev-replace merge). Offending commit took a stab at making mutually exclusive volume operations (add_dev, rm_dev, resize, balance, replace_dev) not block behind volume_mutex if another such operation is in progress and instead return an error right away. Balancing front-end relied on the blocking behaviour, so the fix is ugly, but short of a complete rework, it's the best we can do. Reported-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2013-01-14btrfs: get the device in write mode when deleting itLukas Czerner
When we're deleting the device we should get it in write mode since we're going to re-write the super block magic on that device. And it should fail if the device is read-only. Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
2012-12-16Btrfs: put raid properties into global tableLiu Bo
Raid properties can be shared among raid calculation code, we can put them into a global table to keep it simple. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-16Btrfs: log changed inodes based on the extent map treeJosef Bacik
We don't really need to copy extents from the source tree since we have all of the information already available to us in the extent_map tree. So instead just write the extents straight to the log tree and don't bother to copy the extent items from the source tree. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-16btrfs: Notify udev when removing deviceLukas Czerner
Currently udev does not know about the device being removed from the file system. This may result in the situation where we're unable to mount the file system by UUID or by LABEL because the by-uuid and by-label links may still point to the device which is no longer part of the btrfs file system and hence does not have any btrfs super block. It can be easily reproduced by the following: mkfs.btrfs -L bugfs /dev/loop[0-6] mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/test btrfs device delete /dev/loop0 /mnt/test umount /mnt/test mount LABEL=bugfs /mnt/test <---- this fails then see: ls -l /dev/disk/by-label/bugfs which will still point to the /dev/loop0 We did not noticed this before because libblkid would send the udev event for us when it notice that the link does not fit the reality, however it does not do that anymore and completely relies on udev information. Fix this by sending the KOBJ_CHANGE event to the bdev kobject after successful device removal. Note that this does not affect device addition, because we will open the device prior the addition from userspace and udev will notice that and reread the device afterwards. Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-16Btrfs: fix a build warning for an unused labelStefan Behrens
This issue was detected by the "0-DAY kernel build testing". fs/btrfs/volumes.c: In function 'btrfs_rm_device': fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1505:1: warning: label 'error_close' defined but not used [-Wunused-label] Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: allow repair code to include target disk when searching mirrorsStefan Behrens
Make the target disk of a running device replace operation available for reading. This is only used as a last ressort for the defect repair procedure. And it is dependent on the location of the data block to read, because during an ongoing device replace operation, the target drive is only partially filled with the filesystem data. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: optionally avoid reads from device replace source driveStefan Behrens
It is desirable to be able to configure the device replace procedure to avoid reading the source drive (the one to be copied) whenever possible. This is useful when the number of read errors on this disk is high, because it would delay the copy procedure alot. Therefore there is an option to avoid reading from the source disk unless the repair procedure really needs to access it. The regular read req asks for mapping the block with mirror_num == 0, in this case the source disk is avoided whenever possible. The repair code selects the mirror_num explicitly (mirror_num != 0), this case is not changed by this commit. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: changes to live filesystem are also written to replacement diskStefan Behrens
During a running dev replace operation, all write requests to the live filesystem are duplicated to also write to the target drive. Therefore btrfs_map_block() is changed to duplicate stripes that are written to the source disk of a device replace procedure to be written to the target disk as well. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: introduce GET_READ_MIRRORS functionality for btrfs_map_block()Stefan Behrens
Before this commit, btrfs_map_block() was called with REQ_WRITE in order to retrieve the list of mirrors for a disk block. This needs to be changed for the device replace procedure since it makes a difference whether you are asking for read mirrors or for locations to write to. GET_READ_MIRRORS is introduced as a new interface to call btrfs_map_block(). In the current commit, the functionality is not yet changed, only the interface for GET_READ_MIRRORS is introduced and all the places that should use this new interface are adapted. The reason that REQ_WRITE cannot be abused anymore to retrieve a list of read mirrors is that during a running dev replace operation all write requests to the live filesystem are duplicated to also write to the target drive. Keep in mind that the target disk is only partially a valid copy of the source disk while the operation is ongoing. All writes go to the target disk, but not all reads would return valid data on the target disk. Therefore it is not possible anymore to abuse a REQ_WRITE interface to find valid mirrors for a REQ_READ. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: change core code of btrfs to support the device replace operationsStefan Behrens
This commit contains all the essential changes to the core code of Btrfs for support of the device replace procedure. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: add new sources for device replace codeStefan Behrens
This adds a new file to the sources together with the header file and the changes to ioctl.h and ctree.h that are required by the new C source file. Additionally, 4 new functions are added to volume.c that deal with device creation and destruction. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: handle errors from btrfs_map_bio() everywhereStefan Behrens
With the addition of the device replace procedure, it is possible for btrfs_map_bio(READ) to report an error. This happens when the specific mirror is requested which is located on the target disk, and the copy operation has not yet copied this block. Hence the block cannot be read and this error state is indicated by returning EIO. Some background information follows now. A new mirror is added while the device replace procedure is running. btrfs_get_num_copies() returns one more, and btrfs_map_bio(GET_READ_MIRROR) adds one more mirror if a disk location is involved that was already handled by the device replace copy operation. The assigned mirror num is the highest mirror number, e.g. the value 3 in case of RAID1. If btrfs_map_bio() is invoked with mirror_num == 0 (i.e., select any mirror), the copy on the target drive is never selected because that disk shall be able to perform the write requests as quickly as possible. The parallel execution of read requests would only slow down the disk copy procedure. Second case is that btrfs_map_bio() is called with mirror_num > 0. This is done from the repair code only. In this case, the highest mirror num is assigned to the target disk, since it is used last. And when this mirror is not available because the copy procedure has not yet handled this area, an error is returned. Everywhere in the code the handling of such errors is added now. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: disallow some operations on the device replace target deviceStefan Behrens
This patch adds some code to disallow operations on the device that is used as the target for the device replace operation. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: disallow mutually exclusive admin operations from user modeStefan Behrens
Btrfs admin operations that are manually started from user mode and that cannot be executed at the same time return -EINPROGRESS. A common way to enter and leave this locked section is introduced since it used to be specific to the balance operation. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: pass fs_info instead of rootStefan Behrens
A small number of functions that are used in a device replace procedure when the operation is resumed at mount time are unable to pass the same root pointer that would be used in the regular (ioctl) context. And since the root pointer is not required, only the fs_info is, the root pointer argument is replaced with the fs_info pointer argument. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: add btrfs_scratch_superblock() functionStefan Behrens
This new function is used by the device replace procedure in a later patch. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: pass fs_info to btrfs_map_block() instead of mapping_treeStefan Behrens
This is required for the device replace procedure in a later step. Two calling functions also had to be changed to have the fs_info pointer: repair_io_failure() and scrub_setup_recheck_block(). Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: Pass fs_info to btrfs_num_copies() instead of mapping_treeStefan Behrens
This is required for the device replace procedure in a later step. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: add two more find_device() methodsStefan Behrens
The new function btrfs_find_device_missing_or_by_path() will be used for the device replace procedure. This function itself calls the second new function btrfs_find_device_by_path(). Unfortunately, it is not possible to currently make the rest of the code use these functions as well, since all functions that look similar at first view are all a little bit different in what they are doing. But in the future, new code could benefit from these two new functions, and currently, device replace uses them. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: move some common code into a subfunctionStefan Behrens
Some code to open block devices, to read the superblock and to handle errors was repeated multiple times in 3 places, and the following patch makes use of it as well. This code is now moved into a subfunction. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: protect devices list with its mutexLiu Bo
Since we've kill the bigger one volume_mutex, we need to add devices list mutex back. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: Don't trust the superblock label and simply printk("%s") itStefan Behrens
Someone who is root or capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) could corrupt the superblock and make Btrfs printk("%s") crash while holding the uuid_mutex since nobody forces a limit on the string. Since the uuid_mutex is significant, the system would be unusable afterwards. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12fs/btrfs: use WARNJulia Lawall
Use WARN rather than printk followed by WARN_ON(1), for conciseness. A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this transformation is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression list es; @@ -printk( +WARN(1, es); -WARN_ON(1); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: Fix typo in fs/btrfsMasanari Iida
Correct spelling typo in btrfs. Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: Remove the invalid shrink size check up from btrfs_shrink_dev()jeff.liu
Remove an invalid size check up from btrfs_shrink_dev(). The new size should not larger than the device->total_bytes as it was already verified before coming to here(i.e. new_size < old_size). Remove invalid check up for btrfs_shrink_dev(). Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-11Btrfs: recheck bio against block device when we map the bioJosef Bacik
Alex reported a problem where we were writing between chunks on a rbd device. The thing is we do bio_add_page using logical offsets, but the physical offset may be different. So when we map the bio now check to see if the bio is still ok with the physical offset, and if it is not split the bio up and redo the bio_add_page with the physical sector. This fixes the problem for Alex and doesn't affect performance in the normal case. Thanks, Reported-and-tested-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-11Btrfs: cleanup duplicated division functionsMiao Xie
div_factor{_fine} has been implemented for two times, cleanup it. And I move them into a independent file named math.h because they are common math functions. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-10-25Btrfs: fix deadlock caused by the nested chunk allocationMiao Xie
Steps to reproduce: # mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 <disk1> <disk2> # btrfstune -S 1 <disk1> # mount <disk1> <mnt> # btrfs device add <disk3> <disk4> <mnt> # mount -o remount,rw <mnt> # dd if=/dev/zero of=<mnt>/tmpfile bs=1M count=1 Deadlock happened. It is because of the nested chunk allocation. When we wrote the data into the filesystem, we would allocate the data chunk because there was no data chunk in the filesystem. At the end of the data chunk allocation, we should insert the metadata of the data chunk into the extent tree, but there was no raid1 chunk, so we tried to lock the chunk allocation mutex to allocate the new chunk, but we had held the mutex, the deadlock happened. By rights, we would allocate the raid1 chunk when we added the second device because the profile of the seed filesystem is raid1 and we had two devices. But we didn't do that in fact. It is because the last step of the first device insertion didn't commit the transaction. So when we added the second device, we didn't cow the tree, and just inserted the relative metadata into the leaves which were generated by the first device insertion, and its profile was dup. So, I fix this problem by commiting the transaction at the end of the first device insertion. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>