summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2009-06-11nilfs2: correct exclusion control in nilfs_remount functionRyusuke Konishi
nilfs_remount() changes mount state of a superblock instance. Even though nilfs accesses other superblock instances during mount or remount, the mount state was not properly protected in nilfs_remount(). Moreover, nilfs_remount() has a lock order reversal problem; nilfs_get_sb() holds: 1. bdev->bd_mount_sem 2. sb->s_umount (sget acquires) and nilfs_remount() holds: 1. sb->s_umount (locked by the caller in vfs) 2. bdev->bd_mount_sem To avoid these problems, this patch divides a semaphore protecting super block instances from nilfs->ns_sem, and applies it to the mount state protection in nilfs_remount(). With this change, bd_mount_sem use is removed from nilfs_remount() and the lock order reversal will be resolved. And the new rw-semaphore, nilfs->ns_super_sem will properly protect the mount state except the modification from nilfs_error function. Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11nilfs2: simplify remaining sget() useRyusuke Konishi
This simplifies the test function passed on the remaining sget() callsite in nilfs. Instead of checking mount type (i.e. ro-mount/rw-mount/snapshot mount) in the test function passed to sget(), this patch first looks up the nilfs_sb_info struct which the given mount type matches, and then acquires the super block instance holding the nilfs_sb_info. Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11nilfs2: get rid of sget use for checking if current mount is presentRyusuke Konishi
This stops using sget() for checking if an r/w-mount or an r/o-mount exists on the device. This elimination uses a back pointer to the current mount added to nilfs object. Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11nilfs2: get rid of sget use for acquiring nilfs objectRyusuke Konishi
This will change the way to obtain nilfs object in nilfs_get_sb() function. Previously, a preliminary sget() call was performed, and the nilfs object was acquired from a super block instance found by the sget() call. This patch, instead, instroduces a new dedicated function find_or_create_nilfs(); as the name implies, the function finds an existent nilfs object from a global list or creates a new one if no object is found on the device. Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11nilfs2: remove meaningless EBUSY case from nilfs_get_sb functionRyusuke Konishi
The following EBUSY case in nilfs_get_sb() is meaningless. Indeed, this error code is never returned to the caller. if (!s->s_root) { ... } else if (!(s->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) { err = -EBUSY; } This simply removes the else case. Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11remove the call to ->write_super in __sync_filesystemChristoph Hellwig
Now that all filesystems provide ->sync_fs methods we can change __sync_filesystem to only call ->sync_fs. This gives us a clear separation between periodic writeouts which are driven by ->write_super and data integrity syncs that go through ->sync_fs. (modulo file_fsync which is also going away) Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11nilfs2: call nilfs2_write_super from nilfs2_sync_fsChristoph Hellwig
The call to ->write_super from __sync_filesystem will go away, so make sure nilfs2 performs the same actions from inside ->sync_fs. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11jffs2: call jffs2_write_super from jffs2_sync_fsChristoph Hellwig
The call to ->write_super from __sync_filesystem will go away, so make sure jffs2 performs the same actions from inside ->sync_fs. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11ufs: add ->sync_fsChristoph Hellwig
Add a ->sync_fs method for data integrity syncs, and reimplement ->write_super ontop of it. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11sysv: add ->sync_fsChristoph Hellwig
Add a ->sync_fs method for data integrity syncs, and reimplement ->write_super ontop of it. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11hfsplus: add ->sync_fsChristoph Hellwig
Add a ->sync_fs method for data integrity syncs, and reimplement ->write_super ontop of it. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11hfs: add ->sync_fsChristoph Hellwig
Add a ->sync_fs method for data integrity syncs. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11fat: add ->sync_fsChristoph Hellwig
Add a ->sync_fs method for data integrity syncs. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11ext2: add ->sync_fsChristoph Hellwig
Add a ->sync_fs method for data integrity syncs, and reimplement ->write_super ontop of it. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11exofs: add ->sync_fsChristoph Hellwig
Add a ->sync_fs method for data integrity syncs, and reimplement ->write_super ontop of it. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11bfs: add ->sync_fsChristoph Hellwig
Add a ->sync_fs method for data integrity syncs, and reimplement ->write_super ontop of it. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11affs: add ->sync_fsChristoph Hellwig
Add a ->sync_fs method for data integrity syncs. Factor out common code between affs_put_super, affs_write_super and the new affs_sync_fs into a helper. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11sanitize ->fsync() for affsAl Viro
unfortunately, for affs (especially for affs directories) we have no real way to keep track of metadata ownership. So we have to do more or less what file_fsync() does, but we do *not* need to call write_super() there. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11repair bfs_write_inode(), switch bfs to simple_fsync()Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11Fix adfs GET_FRAG_ID() on big-endianAl Viro
Missing conversion to host-endian before doing shifts Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11repair adfs ->write_inode(), switch to simple_fsync()Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11switch omfs to simple_fsync()Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11switch udf to simple_fsync()Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11switch ufs to simple_fsync()Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11repair sysv_write_inode(), switch sysv to simple_fsync()Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11switch minix to simple_fsync()Al Viro
* get minix_write_inode() to honour the second argument * now we can use simple_fsync() for minixfs Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11switch ext2 to simple_fsync()Al Viro
kill ext2_sync_file() (along with ext2/fsync.c), get rid of ext2_update_inode() - it's an alias of ext2_write_inode(). Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11Sanitize ->fsync() for FATAl Viro
* mark directory data blocks as assoc. metadata * add new inode to deal with FAT, mark FAT blocks as assoc. metadata of that * now ->fsync() is trivial both for files and directories Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11fs/qnx4: sanitize includesAl Viro
fs-internal parts of qnx4_fs.h taken to fs/qnx4/qnx4.h, includes adjusted, qnx4_fs.h doesn't need unifdef anymore. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11Sanitize qnx4 fsync handlingAl Viro
* have directory operations use mark_buffer_dirty_inode(), so that sync_mapping_buffers() would get those. * make qnx4_write_inode() honour its last argument. * get rid of insane copies of very ancient "walk the indirect blocks" in qnx4/fsync - they never matched the actual fs layout and, fortunately, never'd been called. Again, all this junk is not needed; ->fsync() should just do sync_mapping_buffers + sync_inode (and if we implement block allocation for qnx4, we'll need to use mark_buffer_dirty_inode() for extent blocks) Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11New helper - simple_fsync()Al Viro
writes associated buffers, then does sync_inode() to write the inode itself (and to make it clean). Depends on ->write_inode() honouring the second argument. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11Push BKL down into ->remount_fs()Alessio Igor Bogani
[xfs, btrfs, capifs, shmem don't need BKL, exempt] Signed-off-by: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@texware.it> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11fs: block_dump missing dentry lockingNick Piggin
I think the block_dump output in __mark_inode_dirty is missing dentry locking. Surely the i_dentry list can change any time, so we may not even *get* a dentry there. If we do get one by chance, then it would appear to be able to go away or get renamed at any time... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11fs: remove incorrect I_NEW warningsNick Piggin
Some filesystems can call in to sync an inode that is still in the I_NEW state (eg. ext family, when mounted with -osync). This is OK because the filesystem has sole access to the new inode, so it can modify i_state without races (because no other thread should be modifying it, by definition of I_NEW). Ie. a false positive, so remove the warnings. The races are described here 7ef0d7377cb287e08f3ae94cebc919448e1f5dff, which is also where the warnings were introduced. Reported-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11xfs: remove ->write_super and stop maintaining ->s_dirtChristoph Hellwig
the write_super method is used for (1) writing back the superblock periodically from pdflush (2) called just before ->sync_fs for data integerity syncs We don't need (1) because we have our own peridoc writeout through xfssyncd, and we don't need (2) because xfs_fs_sync_fs performs a proper synchronous superblock writeout after all other data and metadata has been written out. Also remove ->s_dirt tracking as it's only used to decide when too call ->write_super. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11ntfs: remove old debug check for dirty data in ntfs_put_super()Jens Axboe
This should not trigger anymore, so kill it. Acked-by: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11fs: Remove i_cindex from struct inodeTheodore Ts'o
The only user of the i_cindex element in the inode structure is used is by the firewire drivers. As part of an attempt to slim down the inode structure to save memory --- since a typical Linux system will have hundreds of thousands if not millions of inodes cached, a reduction in the size inode has high leverage. The firewire driver does not need i_cindex in any fast path, so it's simple enough to calculate when it is needed, instead of wasting space in the inode structure. Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: krh@redhat.com Cc: stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11->write_super lock_super pushdownChristoph Hellwig
Push down lock_super into ->write_super instances and remove it from the caller. Following filesystem don't need ->s_lock in ->write_super and are skipped: * bfs, nilfs2 - no other uses of s_lock and have internal locks in ->write_super * ext2 - uses BKL in ext2_write_super and has internal calls without s_lock * reiserfs - no other uses of s_lock as has reiserfs_write_lock (BKL) in ->write_super * xfs - no other uses of s_lock and uses internal lock (buffer lock on superblock buffer) to serialize ->write_super. Also xfs_fs_write_super is superflous and will go away in the next merge window Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11jffs2: move jffs2_write_super to super.cChristoph Hellwig
jffs2_write_super is only called from super.c and doesn't use any functionality from fs.c. So move it over to super.c and make it static there. [should go in through the vfs tree as it is a requirement for the next patch] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11Push BKL down into do_remount_sb()Al Viro
[folded fix from Jiri Slaby] Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11Push BKL down beyond VFS-only parts of do_mount()Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11Push BKL into do_mount()Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11Push lock_super() into the ->remount_fs() of filesystems that care about itAl Viro
Note that since we can't run into contention between remount_fs and write_super (due to exclusion on s_umount), we have to care only about filesystems that touch lock_super() on their own. Out of those ext3, ext4, hpfs, sysv and ufs do need it; fat doesn't since its ->remount_fs() only accesses assign-once data (basically, it's "we have no atime on directories and only have atime on files for vfat; force nodiratime and possibly noatime into *flags"). [folded a build fix from hch] Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11push BKL down into ->put_superChristoph Hellwig
Move BKL into ->put_super from the only caller. A couple of filesystems had trivial enough ->put_super (only kfree and NULLing of s_fs_info + stuff in there) to not get any locking: coda, cramfs, efs, hugetlbfs, omfs, qnx4, shmem, all others got the full treatment. Most of them probably don't need it, but I'd rather sort that out individually. Preferably after all the other BKL pushdowns in that area. [AV: original used to move lock_super() down as well; these changes are removed since we don't do lock_super() at all in generic_shutdown_super() now] [AV: fuse, btrfs and xfs are known to need no damn BKL, exempt] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11No need to do lock_super() for exclusion in generic_shutdown_super()Al Viro
We can't run into contention on it. All other callers of lock_super() either hold s_umount (and we have it exclusive) or hold an active reference to superblock in question, which prevents the call of generic_shutdown_super() while the reference is held. So we can replace lock_super(s) with get_fs_excl() in generic_shutdown_super() (and corresponding change for unlock_super(), of course). Since ext4 expects s_lock held for its put_super, take lock_super() into it. The rest of filesystems do not care at all. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11Trim a bit of crap from fs.hAl Viro
do_remount_sb() is fs/internal.h fodder, fsync_no_super() is long gone. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11Make sure that all callers of remount hold s_umount exclusiveAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11enforce ->sync_fs is only called for rw superblockChristoph Hellwig
Make sure a superblock really is writeable by checking MS_RDONLY under s_umount. sync_filesystems needed some re-arragement for that, but all but one sync_filesystem caller had the correct locking already so that we could add that check there. cachefiles grew s_umount locking. I've also added a WARN_ON to sync_filesystem to assert this for future callers. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11cleanup sync_supersChristoph Hellwig
Merge the write_super helper into sync_super and move the check for ->write_super earlier so that we can avoid grabbing a reference to a superblock that doesn't have it. While we're at it also add a little comment documenting sync_supers. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11dcache: extrace and use d_unlinked()Alexey Dobriyan
d_unlinked() will be used in middle-term to ban checkpointing when opened but unlinked file is detected, and in long term, to detect such situation and special case on it. Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>