summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/acpi/processor.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2015-10-12CPPC: Probe for CPPC tables for each ACPI Processor objectAshwin Chaugule
For each detected ACPI Processor object (ACPI0007), search its device handle for CPPC specific tables (i.e. _CPC) and extract CPU specific performance capabilities. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-01Merge branch 'pm-cpufreq'Rafael J. Wysocki
* pm-cpufreq: (53 commits) cpufreq: speedstep-lib: Use monotonic clock cpufreq: powernv: Increase the verbosity of OCC console messages cpufreq: sfi: use kmemdup rather than duplicating its implementation cpufreq: drop !cpufreq_driver check from cpufreq_parse_governor() cpufreq: rename cpufreq_real_policy as cpufreq_user_policy cpufreq: remove redundant 'policy' field from user_policy cpufreq: remove redundant 'governor' field from user_policy cpufreq: update user_policy.* on success cpufreq: use memcpy() to copy policy cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event cpufreq: mediatek: Add MT8173 cpufreq driver dt-bindings: mediatek: Add MT8173 CPU DVFS clock bindings intel_pstate: append more Oracle OEM table id to vendor bypass list intel_pstate: Add SKY-S support intel_pstate: Fix possible overflow complained by Coverity cpufreq: Correct a freq check in cpufreq_set_policy() cpufreq: Lock CPU online/offline in cpufreq_register_driver() cpufreq: Replace recover_policy with new_policy in cpufreq_online() cpufreq: Separate CPU device registration from CPU online cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling ...
2015-08-25ACPI: Decouple ACPI idle and ACPI processor driversAshwin Chaugule
This patch introduces a new Kconfig symbol, ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE, which is auto selected by architectures which support the ACPI based C states for CPU Idle management. The processor_idle driver in its present form contains declarations specific to X86 and IA64. Since there are no reasonable defaults for other architectures e.g. ARM64, the driver is selected only for X86 or IA64. This helps in decoupling the ACPI processor_driver from the ACPI processor_idle driver which is useful for the upcoming alternative patchwork for controlling CPU Performance (CPPC) and CPU Idle (LPI). Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-08-25ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor driverAshwin Chaugule
The ACPI processor driver is currently tied too closely to the ACPI P-states (PSS) and other related constructs for controlling CPU performance. The newer ACPI specification (v5.1 onwards) introduces alternative methods to PSS. These new mechanisms are described within each ACPI Processor object and so they need to be scanned whenever a new Processor object is detected. This patch introduces a new Kconfig symbol to allow for finer configurability among the two options for controlling performance states. There is no change in functionality and the option is auto-selected by the architectures which support it. A future commit will introduce support for CPPC: A newer method of controlling CPU performance. The OS is not expected to support CPPC and PSS at the same time, so the Kconfig option lets us make the two mutually exclusive at compile time. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> [ rjw: Changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-07-22ACPI / processor: Drop an unused argument of a cleanup routineRafael J. Wysocki
acpi_processor_unregister_performance() actually doesn't use its first argument, so drop it and update the callers accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2015-03-26ACPI / processor: Introduce phys_cpuid_t for CPU hardware IDCatalin Marinas
CPU hardware ID (phys_id) is defined as u32 in structure acpi_processor, but phys_id is used as int in acpi processor driver, so it will lead to some inconsistence for the drivers. Furthermore, to cater for ACPI arch ports that implement 64 bits CPU ids a generic CPU physical id type is required. So introduce typedef u32 phys_cpuid_t in a common file, and introduce a macro PHYS_CPUID_INVALID as (phys_cpuid_t)(-1) if it's not defined by other archs, this will solve the inconsistence in acpi processor driver, and will prepare for the ACPI on ARM64 for the 64 bit CPU hardware ID in the following patch. CC: Rafael J Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Suggested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> [hj: reworked cpu physid map return codes] Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2015-01-05ACPI / processor: Convert apic_id to phys_id to make it arch agnosticHanjun Guo
apic_id in MADT table is the CPU hardware id which identify it self in the system for x86 and ia64, OSPM will use it for SMP init to map APIC ID to logical cpu number in the early boot, when the DSDT/SSDT (ACPI namespace) is scanned later, the ACPI processor driver is probed and the driver will use acpi_id in DSDT to get the apic_id, then map to the logical cpu number which is needed by the processor driver. Before ACPI 5.0, only x86 and ia64 were supported in ACPI spec, so apic_id is used both in arch code and ACPI core which is pretty fine. Since ACPI 5.0, ARM is supported by ACPI and APIC is not available on ARM, this will confuse people when apic_id is both used by x86 and ARM in one function. So convert apic_id to phys_id (which is the original meaning) in ACPI processor dirver to make it arch agnostic, but leave the arch dependent code unchanged, no functional change. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-25ACPI / processor: remove unused variabled from acpi_processor_power structureSudeep Holla
Few elements in the acpi_processor_power structure are unused. It could be remnant in the header missed while the code got removed from the corresponding driver file. This patch removes those unused variables in the structure declaration. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-11ACPI / processor: Update the comments in processor.hHanjun Guo
In commit 46ba51e (ACPI / processor: Introduce ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_ACPI_PDC), acpi_processor_set_pdc() was moved to processor_pdc.c, so update the comments accordingly. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-06-17ACPI / processor replace __attribute__((packed)) by __packedFabian Frederick
This patch fixes checkpatch warnings: "WARNING: __packed is preferred over __attribute__((packed))" Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-30ACPI / processor: Do not request ACPI cpufreq module directlyRafael J. Wysocki
Function acpi_processor_load_module() used by the ACPI processor driver can only really work if the acpi-cpufreq module is available when acpi_processor_start() is executed which usually is not the case for systems loading the processor driver module from an initramfs. Moreover, that used to be a hackish workaround for module autoloading issues, but udev loads acpi-cpufreq just fine nowadays, so that function isn't really necessary any more. For this reason, drop acpi_processor_load_module() entirely. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-09-24ACPI / processor: Introduce apic_id in struct processor to save parsed APIC idJiang Liu
For cpu hot add, we evaluate _MAT or parse MADT twice to get APIC id, here is the code logic: acpi_processor_add() acpi_processor_get_info() acpi_get_cpuid() will evaluate _MAT or parse MADT; acpi_processor_hotadd_init() acpi_map_lsapic() will evaluate _MAT again; This can be done more effectively, this patch introduces apic_id in struct processor to save parsed APIC id, and then we can use it and remove the duplicated _MAT evaluation. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-05-12ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructureRafael J. Wysocki
Split the ACPI processor driver into two parts, one that is non-modular, resides in the ACPI core and handles the enumeration and hotplug of processors and one that implements the rest of the existing processor driver functionality. The non-modular part uses an ACPI scan handler object to enumerate processors on the basis of information provided by the ACPI namespace and to hook up with the common ACPI hotplug infrastructure. It also populates the ACPI handle of each processor device having a corresponding object in the ACPI namespace, which allows the driver proper to bind to those devices, and makes the driver bind to them if it is readily available (i.e. loaded) when the scan handler's .attach() routine is running. There are a few reasons to make this change. First, switching the ACPI processor driver to using the common ACPI hotplug infrastructure reduces code duplication and size considerably, even though a new file is created along with a header comment etc. Second, since the common hotplug code attempts to offline devices before starting the (non-reversible) removal procedure, it will abort (and possibly roll back) hot-remove operations involving processors if cpu_down() returns an error code for one of them instead of continuing them blindly (if /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/force_remove is unset). That is a more desirable behavior than what the current code does. Finally, the separation of the scan/hotplug part from the driver proper makes it possible to simplify the driver's .remove() routine, because it doesn't need to worry about the possible cleanup related to processor removal any more (the scan/hotplug part is responsible for that now) and can handle device removal and driver removal symmetricaly (i.e. as appropriate). Some user-visible changes in sysfs are made (for example, the 'sysdev' link from the ACPI device node to the processor device's directory is gone and a 'physical_node' link is present instead and a corresponding 'firmware_node' is present in the processor device's directory, the processor driver is now visible under /sys/bus/cpu/drivers/ and bound to the processor device), but that shouldn't affect the functionality that users care about (frequency scaling, C-states and thermal management). Tested on my venerable Toshiba Portege R500. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-05-12ACPI / PM: Move processor suspend/resume to syscore_opsRafael J. Wysocki
The system suspend routine of the ACPI processor driver saves the BUS_MASTER_RLD register and its resume routine restores it. However, there can be only one such register in the system and it really should be saved after non-boot CPUs have been offlined and restored before they are put back online during resume. For this reason, move the saving and restoration of BUS_MASTER_RLD to syscore suspend and syscore resume, respectively, and drop the no longer necessary suspend/resume callbacks from the ACPI processor driver. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-03-06acpi: Export the acpi_processor_get_performance_infoKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk
The git commit d5aaffa9dd531c978c6f3fea06a2972653bd7fc8 (cpufreq: handle cpufreq being disabled for all exported function) tightens the cpufreq API by returning errors when disable_cpufreq() had been called. The problem we are hitting is that the module xen-acpi-processor which uses the ACPI's functions: acpi_processor_register_performance, acpi_processor_preregister_performance, and acpi_processor_notify_smm fails at acpi_processor_register_performance with -22. Note that earlier during bootup in arch/x86/xen/setup.c there is also an call to cpufreq's API: disable_cpufreq(). This is b/c we want the Linux kernel to parse the ACPI data, but leave the cpufreq decisions to the hypervisor. In v3.9 all the checks that d5aaffa9dd531c978c6f3fea06a2972653bd7fc8 added are now hit and the calls to cpufreq_register_notifier will now fail. This means that acpi_processor_ppc_init ends up printing: "Warning: Processor Platform Limit not supported" and the acpi_processor_ppc_status is not set. The repercussions of that is that the call to acpi_processor_register_performance fails right away at: if (!(acpi_processor_ppc_status & PPC_REGISTERED)) and we don't progress any further on parsing and extracting the _P* objects. The only reason the Xen code called that function was b/c it was exported and the only way to gather the P-states. But we can also just make acpi_processor_get_performance_info be exported and not use acpi_processor_register_performance. This patch does so. Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
2012-09-17cpuidle / ACPI : move cpuidle_device field out of the acpi_processor_power ↵Daniel Lezcano
structure Currently we have the cpuidle_device field in the acpi_processor_power structure. This adds a dependency between processor.h and cpuidle.h Although it is not a real problem, removing this dependency has the benefit of separating a bit more the cpuidle code from the rest of the acpi code. Also, the compilation should be a bit improved because we do no longer include cpuidle.h in processor.h. The preprocessor was generating 30418 loc and with this patch it generates 30256 loc for processor_thermal.c, a file which is not concerned at all by cpuidle, like processor_perflib.c and processor_throttling.c. That may sound ridiculous, but "small streams make big rivers" :P This patch moves this field into a static global per cpu variable like what is done in the intel_idle driver. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-09-15ACPI / processor: remove unused function parameterDaniel Lezcano
The 'device' parameter is not used neither in acpi_processor_power_init and acpi_processor_power_exit. This patch removes it. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-09-05cpuidle / ACPI : remove power from acpi_processor_cx structureDaniel Lezcano
Remove the unused power field from struct struct acpi_processor_cx. [rjw: Modified changelog.] Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-07-19Merge branch 'pm-acpi'Rafael J. Wysocki
* pm-acpi: (24 commits) olpc-xo15-sci: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management ACPI / PM: Drop PM callbacks from the ACPI bus type ACPI / PM: Drop legacy driver PM callbacks that are not used any more ACPI / PM: Do not execute legacy driver PM callbacks acpi_power_meter: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management fujitsu-tablet: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management classmate-laptop: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management xo15-ebook: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management toshiba_bluetooth: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management panasonic-laptop: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management sony-laptop: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management hp_accel: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management toshiba_acpi: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management ACPI: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management in the SBS driver ACPI: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management in the power driver ACPI: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management in the button driver ACPI: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management in the battery driver ACPI: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management in the AC driver ACPI: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management in processor driver ACPI: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management in the thermal driver ...
2012-07-17cpuilde / ACPI: remove time from acpi_processor_cx structureDaniel Lezcano
Remove the time field as it is not used. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-07-17cpuidle / ACPI: remove usage from acpi_processor_cx structureDaniel Lezcano
Remove the usage field as it is not used. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-07-17cpuidle / ACPI : remove latency_ticks from acpi_processor_cx structureDaniel Lezcano
Remove the latency_ticks field as it is not used. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-07-01ACPI: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management in processor driverRafael J. Wysocki
Make the ACPI processor driver define its PM callbacks through a struct dev_pm_ops object rather than by using legacy PM hooks in struct acpi_device_ops. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-07-01ACPI / PM: Drop pm_message_t argument from device suspend callbackRafael J. Wysocki
None of the drivers implementing the ACPI device suspend callback uses the pm_message_t argument of it, so this argument may be dropped entirely from that callback. This will simplify switching the ACPI bus type to PM handling based on struct dev_pm_ops. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-02-02Merge 3.3-rc2 into the driver-core-next branch.Greg Kroah-Hartman
This was done to resolve a merge and build problem with the drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c file. Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-01-26ACPI: Load acpi-cpufreq from processor driver automaticallyAndi Kleen
The only left over hole in automatic cpufreq driver loading was the loading of ACPI cpufreq. This driver should be loaded when ACPI supports a _PDC method and the CPU vendor wants to use acpi cpufreq. Simply add a request module call to the acpi processor core driver when this is true. This seems like the simplest solution for this. Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2012-01-19ACPI processor hotplug: Delay acpi_processor_start() call for hotplugged coresThomas Renninger
Delay the setting up of features (cpuidle, throttling by calling acpi_processor_start()) to the time when the hotplugged core got onlined the first time and got fully initialized. Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-11-06cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle statesDeepthi Dharwar
This patch makes the cpuidle_states structure global (single copy) instead of per-cpu. The statistics needed on per-cpu basis by the governor are kept per-cpu. This simplifies the cpuidle subsystem as state registration is done by single cpu only. Having single copy of cpuidle_states saves memory. Rare case of asymmetric C-states can be handled within the cpuidle driver and architectures such as POWER do not have asymmetric C-states. Having single/global registration of all the idle states, dynamic C-state transitions on x86 are handled by the boot cpu. Here, the boot cpu would disable all the devices, re-populate the states and later enable all the devices, irrespective of the cpu that would receive the notification first. Reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/25/83 Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@gmail.com> Tested-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Acked-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-07-16ACPI: constify ops structsVasiliy Kulikov
Structs battery_file, acpi_dock_ops, file_operations, thermal_cooling_device_ops, thermal_zone_device_ops, kernel_param_ops are not changed in runtime. It is safe to make them const. register_hotplug_dock_device() was altered to take const "ops" argument to respect acpi_dock_ops' const notion. Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com> Acked-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-05-29ACPI: processor: fix processor_physically_present in UP kernelLin Ming
Usually, there are multiple processors defined in ACPI table, for example Scope (_PR) { Processor (CPU0, 0x00, 0x00000410, 0x06) {} Processor (CPU1, 0x01, 0x00000410, 0x06) {} Processor (CPU2, 0x02, 0x00000410, 0x06) {} Processor (CPU3, 0x03, 0x00000410, 0x06) {} } processor_physically_present(...) will be called to check whether those processors are physically present. Currently we have below codes in processor_physically_present, cpuid = acpi_get_cpuid(...); if ((cpuid == -1) && (num_possible_cpus() > 1)) return false; return true; In UP kernel, acpi_get_cpuid(...) always return -1 and num_possible_cpus() always return 1, so processor_physically_present(...) always returns true for all passed in processor handles. This is wrong for UP processor or SMP processor running UP kernel. This patch removes the !SMP version of acpi_get_cpuid(), so both UP and SMP kernel use the same acpi_get_cpuid function. And for UP kernel, only processor 0 is valid. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16548 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16357 Tested-by: Anton Kochkov <anton.kochkov@gmail.com> Tested-by: Ambroz Bizjak <ambrop7@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-10ACPI: Reevaluate whether the T-state is supported or not after cpu is ↵Zhao Yakui
online/offline After one CPU is offlined, it is unnecessary to switch T-state for it. So it will be better that the throttling is disabled after the cpu is offline. At the same time after one cpu is online, we should check whether the T-state is supported and then set the corresponding T-state flag. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-08-15ACPI processor: remove deprecated ACPI procfs I/FZhang Rui
Remove deprecated ACPI processor procfs I/F, including: /proc/acpi/processor/CPUX/power /proc/acpi/processor/CPUX/limit /proc/acpi/processor/CPUX/info /proc/acpi/processor/CPUX/throttling still exists, as we don't have sysfs I/F available for now. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-07-22ACPI: skip checking BM_STS if the BIOS doesn't ask for itLen Brown
It turns out that there is a bit in the _CST for Intel FFH C3 that tells the OS if we should be checking BM_STS or not. Linux has been unconditionally checking BM_STS. If the chip-set is configured to enable BM_STS, it can retard or completely prevent entry into deep C-states -- as illustrated by turbostat: http://userweb.kernel.org/~lenb/acpi/utils/pmtools/turbostat/ ref: Intel Processor Vendor-Specific ACPI Interface Specification table 4 "_CST FFH GAS Field Encoding" Bit 1: Set to 1 if OSPM should use Bus Master avoidance for this C-state https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15886 Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-05-21ACPI: delete unused c-state promotion/demotion data strucuturesLen Brown
These were used before cpuidle by the native ACPI idle driver, which tracked promotion and demotion between states. The code was referenced by CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS for /proc/acpi/processor/*/power, but as we no longer do promotion/demotion, that reference has been a NOP since the transition. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-03-14ACPI: processor: export acpi_get_cpuid()Alex Chiang
Rename static get_cpu_id() to acpi_get_cpuid() and export it. This change also gives us an opportunity to remove the #ifndef CONFIG_SMP from processor_driver.c and into a header file where it properly belongs. Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-03-14ACPI: processor: mv processor_pdc.c processor_core.cAlex Chiang
We've renamed the old processor_core.c to processor_driver.c, to convey the idea that it can be built modular and has driver-like bits. Now let's re-create a processor_core.c for the bits needed statically by the rest of the kernel. The contents of processor_pdc.c are a good starting spot, so let's just rename that file and complete our three card monte. Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-03-03Merge branch 'for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/percpu * 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/percpu: percpu: add __percpu sparse annotations to what's left percpu: add __percpu sparse annotations to fs percpu: add __percpu sparse annotations to core kernel subsystems local_t: Remove leftover local.h this_cpu: Remove pageset_notifier this_cpu: Page allocator conversion percpu, x86: Generic inc / dec percpu instructions local_t: Move local.h include to ringbuffer.c and ring_buffer_benchmark.c module: Use this_cpu_xx to dynamically allocate counters local_t: Remove cpu_local_xx macros percpu: refactor the code in pcpu_[de]populate_chunk() percpu: remove compile warnings caused by __verify_pcpu_ptr() percpu: make accessors check for percpu pointer in sparse percpu: add __percpu for sparse. percpu: make access macros universal percpu: remove per_cpu__ prefix.
2010-02-17percpu: add __percpu sparse annotations to what's leftTejun Heo
Add __percpu sparse annotations to places which didn't make it in one of the previous patches. All converions are trivial. These annotations are to make sparse consider percpu variables to be in a different address space and warn if accessed without going through percpu accessors. This patch doesn't affect normal builds. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
2010-01-28ACPI: replace acpi_integer by u64Lin Ming
acpi_integer is now obsolete and removed from the ACPICA code base, replaced by u64. Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-12-22ACPI: processor: remove _PDC object list from struct acpi_processorAlex Chiang
When we call _PDC, we get a handle to the processor, allocate the object list buffer as needed, and free it immediately after calling _PDC. There's no need to drag around this object list with us everywhere else, so let's just get rid of it. Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-12-22ACPI: processor: change acpi_processor_set_pdc() interfaceAlex Chiang
When calling _PDC, we really only need the handle to the processor to call the method; we don't look at any other parts of the struct acpi_processor * given to us. In the early path, when we walk the namespace, we are given the handle directly, so just pass it through to acpi_processor_set_pdc() without stuffing it into a wasteful struct acpi_processor allocated on the stack each time This saves 2834 bytes of stack. Update the interface accordingly. Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-12-22ACPI: processor: unify arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdcAlex Chiang
The x86 and ia64 implementations of the function in $subject are exactly the same. Also, since the arch-specific implementations of setting _PDC have been completely hollowed out, remove the empty shells. Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-12-22ACPI: processor: finish unifying arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc()Alex Chiang
The only thing arch-specific about calling _PDC is what bits get set in the input obj_list buffer. There's no need for several levels of indirection to twiddle those bits. Additionally, since we're just messing around with a buffer, we can simplify the interface; no need to pass around the entire struct acpi_processor * just to get at the buffer. Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-12-22ACPI: processor: call _PDC earlyAlex Chiang
We discovered that at least one machine (HP Envy), methods in the DSDT attempt to call external methods defined in a dynamically loaded SSDT. Unfortunately, the DSDT methods we are trying to call are part of the EC initialization, which happens very early, and the the dynamic SSDT is only loaded when a processor _PDC method runs much later. This results in namespace lookup errors for the (as of yet) undefined methods. Since Windows doesn't have any issues with this machine, we take it as a hint that they must be evaluating _PDC much earlier than we are. Thus, the proper thing for Linux to do should be to match the Windows implementation more closely. Provide a mechanism to call _PDC before we enable the EC. Doing so loads the dynamic tables, and allows the EC to be enabled correctly. The ACPI processor driver will still evaluate _PDC in its .add() method to cover the hotplug case. Resolves: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14824 Cc: ming.m.lin@intel.com Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-12-16Merge branch 'ost' into releaseLen Brown
Conflicts: include/acpi/processor.h Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-11-24[ACPI/CPUFREQ] Introduce bios_limit per cpu cpufreq sysfs interfaceThomas Renninger
This interface is mainly intended (and implemented) for ACPI _PPC BIOS frequency limitations, but other cpufreq drivers can also use it for similar use-cases. Why is this needed: Currently it's not obvious why cpufreq got limited. People see cpufreq/scaling_max_freq reduced, but this could have happened by: - any userspace prog writing to scaling_max_freq - thermal limitations - hardware (_PPC in ACPI case) limitiations Therefore export bios_limit (in kHz) to: - Point the user that it's the BIOS (broken or intended) which limits frequency - Export it as a sysfs interface for userspace progs. While this was a rarely used feature on laptops, there will appear more and more server implemenations providing "Green IT" features like allowing the service processor to limit the frequency. People want to know about HW/BIOS frequency limitations. All ACPI P-state driven cpufreq drivers are covered with this patch: - powernow-k8 - powernow-k7 - acpi-cpufreq Tested with a patched DSDT which limits the first two cores (_PPC returns 1) via _PPC, exposed by bios_limit: # echo 2200000 >cpu2/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq # cat cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq 2600000 2600000 2200000 2200000 # #scaling_max_freq shows general user/thermal/BIOS limitations # cat cpu*/cpufreq/bios_limit 2600000 2600000 2800000 2800000 # #bios_limit only shows the HW/BIOS limitation CC: Pallipadi Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> CC: davej@codemonkey.org.uk CC: linux@dominikbrodowski.net Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2009-11-06ACPI: Notify the _PPC evaluation status to the platformZhao Yakui
According to the ACPI spec(section 8.4.4.3) OSPM should convey the _PPC evaluations status to the platform if there exists the _OST object. The _OST contains two arguments: The first is the PERFORMANCE notificatin event. The second is the status of _PPC object. OSPM will convey the _PPC evaluation status to the platform. Of course when the module parameter of "ignore_ppc" is added, OSPM won't evaluate the _PPC object. But it will call the _OST object. At the same time the _OST object will be evaluated only when the PERFORMANCE notification event is received. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-08-26ACPI processor: force throttling state when BIOS returns incorrect valueFrans Pop
If the BIOS reports an invalid throttling state (which seems to be fairly common after system boot), a reset is done to state T0. Because of a check in acpi_processor_get_throttling_ptc(), the reset never actually gets executed, which results in the error reoccurring on every access of for example /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling. Add a 'force' option to acpi_processor_set_throttling() to ensure the reset really takes effect. Addresses http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 This patch, together with the next one, fixes a regression introduced in 2.6.30, listed on the regression list. They have been available for 2.5 months now in bugzilla, but have not been picked up, despite various reminders and without any reason given. Google shows that numerous people are hitting this issue. The issue is in itself relatively minor, but the bug in the code is clear. The patches have been in all my kernels and today testing has shown that throttling works correctly with the patches applied when the system overheats (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13918#c14). Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-06-20ACPI: pdc init related memory leak with physical CPU hotplugPallipadi, Venkatesh
arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc() in x86 and ia64 results in memory allocated for _PDC objects that is never freed and will cause memory leak in case of physical CPU remove and add. Patch fixes the memory leak by freeing the objects soon after _PDC is evaluated. Reported-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-04-22ACPI: delete obsolete "bus master activity" proc fieldLen Brown
Linux-2.6.29 deleted the legacy ACPI idle handler, leaving the CPU_IDLE handler, which does not track bus master activity. So delete the unused bm_activity field -- it is confusing to print an always zero value. This patch could break programs that parse /proc/acpi/processor/*/power, since it deletes this line from that file: bus master activity: 00000000 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13145 is not fixed by this patch, but provoked this patch. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>