| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
With each test taking 4 seconds the runtime of pcm-test can add up. Since
generally each card in the system is physically independent and will be
unaffected by what's going on with other cards we can mitigate this by
testing each card in parallel. Make a list of cards as we enumerate the
system and then start a thread for each, then join the threads to ensure
they have all finished. The threads each run the same tests we currently
run for each PCM on the card before exiting.
The list of PCMs is kept global since it helps with global operations
like working out our planned number of tests and identifying missing PCMs
and it seemed neater to check for PCMs on the right card in the card
thread than make every PCM loop iterate over cards as well.
We don't run per-PCM tests in parallel since in embedded systems it can
be the case that resources are shared between the PCMs and operations on
one PCM on a card may constrain what can be done on another PCM on the same
card leading to potentially unstable results.
We use a mutex to ensure that the reporting of results is serialised and we
don't have issues with anything like the current test number, we could do
this in the kselftest framework but it seems like this might cause problems
for other tests that are doing lower level testing and building in
constrained environments such as nolibc so this seems more sensible.
Note that the ordering of the tests can't be guaranteed as things stand,
this does not seem like a major problem since the numbering of tests often
changes as test programs are changed so results parsers are expected to
rely on the test name rather than the test numbers. We also now prefix the
machine generated test name when printing the description of the test since
this is logged before streaming starts.
On my two card desktop system this reduces the overall runtime by a
third.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230203-alsa-pcm-test-card-thread-v1-1-59941640ebba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
|
|
Obtain all test parameters from the configuration files. The defaults
are defined in the pcm-test.conf file. The test count and parameters
may be variable per specific hardware.
Also, handle alt_formats field now (with the fixes in the format loop).
It replaces the original "automatic" logic which is not so universal.
The code may be further extended to skip various tests based
on the configuration hints, if the exact PCM hardware parameters
are not available for the given hardware.
Signed-off-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221208-alsa-pcm-test-hacks-v4-2-5a152e65b1e1@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
|
|
The minimal alsa-lib configuration code is similar in both mixer
and pcm tests. Move this code to the shared conf.c source file.
Also, fix the build rules inspired by rseq tests. Build libatest.so
which is linked to the both test utilities dynamically.
Also, set the TEST_FILES variable for lib.mk.
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221129085306.2345763-1-perex@perex.cz
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
|
|
This initial code does a simple sample transfer tests. By default,
all PCM devices are detected and tested with short and long
buffering parameters for 4 seconds. If the sample transfer timing
is not in a +-100ms boundary, the test fails. Only the interleaved
buffering scheme is supported in this version.
The configuration may be modified with the configuration files.
A specific hardware configuration is detected and activated
using the sysfs regex matching. This allows to use the DMI string
(/sys/class/dmi/id/* tree) or any other system parameters
exposed in sysfs for the matching for the CI automation.
The configuration file may also specify the PCM device list to detect
the missing PCM devices.
v1..v2:
- added missing alsa-local.h header file
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@intel.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@intel.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@google.com>
Cc: Jimmy Cheng-Yi Chiang <cychiang@google.com>
Cc: Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@google.com>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221108115914.3751090-1-perex@perex.cz
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
|
|
Follow the pattern used by other selftests like memfd and fall back on the
standard toolchain options to build with a system installed alsa-lib if
we don't get anything from pkg-config. This reduces our build dependencies
a bit in the common case while still allowing use of pkg-config in case
there is a need for it.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220531151337.2933810-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
|
|
Add a basic test for the mixer control interface. For every control on
every sound card in the system it checks that it can read and write the
default value where the control supports that and for writeable controls
attempts to write all valid values, restoring the default values after
each test to minimise disruption for users.
There are quite a few areas for improvement - currently no coverage of the
generation of notifications, several of the control types don't have any
coverage for the values and we don't have any testing of error handling
when we attempt to write out of range values - but this provides some basic
coverage.
This is added as a kselftest since unlike other ALSA test programs it does
not require either physical setup of the device or interactive monitoring
by users and kselftest is one of the test suites that is frequently run by
people doing general automated testing so should increase coverage. It is
written in terms of alsa-lib since tinyalsa is not generally packaged for
distributions which makes things harder for general users interested in
kselftest as a whole but it will be a barrier to people with Android.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210185410.740009-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
|
