| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The commit fd88d16c58c2 ("selftests/seccomp: Be more precise with
syscall arguments.") use PAGE_SIZE directly which lead to build
failure on arm64.
Replace it with generic interface(sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE)) to fix this
failure.
Build and test successful on x86_64 and arm64.
Signed-off-by: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
|
|
Certain syscall emulation layers strictly check that the number of
arguments match what the syscall handler expects. The KILL_one_arg_one and
KILL_one_arg_six tests passed more parameters than expected to various
syscalls, causing failures in this emulation mode. Instead, test using
syscalls that take the appropriate number of arguments.
Signed-off-by: Robert Sesek <rsesek@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
|
|
Changing arm64 syscalls is done via a specific register set, more like s390
than like arm (specific ptrace call) and x86 (part of general registers).
Since (restarting) poll doesn't exist on arm64, switch to using nanosleep
for testing restart_syscall. And since it looks like the syscall ABI is
inconsistent on arm-compat, so we must work around it (and document it) in
the test.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
|
|
This adds support for s390 to the seccomp selftests. Some improvements
were made to enhance the accuracy of failure reporting, and additional
tests were added to validate assumptions about the currently traced
syscall. Also adds early asserts for running on older kernels to avoid
noise when the seccomp syscall is not implemented.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
|
|
Wire up the syscall number and regs so the tests work on powerpc.
With the powerpc kernel support just merged, all tests pass on ppc64,
ppc64 (compat), ppc64le, ppc, ppc64e and ppc64e (compat).
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
The seccomp_bpf test uses BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS to load 32-bit values
from seccomp_data->args. On big endian machines this will load the high
word of the argument, which is not what the test wants.
Borrow a hack from samples/seccomp/bpf-helper.h which changes the offset
on big endian to account for this.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
|
|
This imports the existing seccomp test suite into the kernel's selftests
tree. It contains extensive testing of seccomp features and corner cases.
There remain additional tests to move into the kernel tree, but they have
not yet been ported to all the architectures seccomp supports:
https://github.com/redpig/seccomp/tree/master/tests
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
|
