From ce58c0ab4bcf38482dfc095af0c4ed55a5a88698 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:18:09 +0900 Subject: libata: retry FS IOs even if it has failed with AC_ERR_INVALID commit 534ead709235b967b659947c55d9130873a432c4 upstream. libata currently doesn't retry if a command fails with AC_ERR_INVALID assuming that retrying won't get it any further even if retried. However, a failure may be classified as invalid through hardware glitch (incorrect reading of the error register or firmware bug) and there isn't whole lot to gain by not retrying as actually invalid commands will be failed immediately. Also, commands serving FS IOs are extremely unlikely to be invalid. Retry FS IOs even if it's marked invalid. Transient and incorrect invalid failure was seen while debugging firmware related issue on Samsung n130 on bko#14314. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14314 Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Reported-by: Johannes Stezenbach Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c index 3882e7ec0749..9358fa607bbc 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c @@ -1901,8 +1901,9 @@ static void ata_eh_link_autopsy(struct ata_link *link) qc->err_mask &= ~(AC_ERR_DEV | AC_ERR_OTHER); /* determine whether the command is worth retrying */ - if (!(qc->err_mask & AC_ERR_INVALID) && - ((qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_IO) || qc->err_mask != AC_ERR_DEV)) + if (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_IO || + (!(qc->err_mask & AC_ERR_INVALID) && + qc->err_mask != AC_ERR_DEV)) qc->flags |= ATA_QCFLAG_RETRY; /* accumulate error info */ -- cgit v1.2.3