From dfe4f69f8ee06f8a95877cf8fb98795e8ac65eca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:27:57 -0700 Subject: tcp/dccp: drop SYN packets if accept queue is full commit 5ea8ea2cb7f1d0db15762c9b0bb9e7330425a071 upstream. Per listen(fd, backlog) rules, there is really no point accepting a SYN, sending a SYNACK, and dropping the following ACK packet if accept queue is full, because application is not draining accept queue fast enough. This behavior is fooling TCP clients that believe they established a flow, while there is nothing at server side. They might then send about 10 MSS (if using IW10) that will be dropped anyway while server is under stress. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Acked-by: Neal Cardwell Acked-by: Yuchung Cheng Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- include/net/inet_connection_sock.h | 5 ----- net/dccp/ipv4.c | 8 +------- net/dccp/ipv6.c | 2 +- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 8 +------- 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h b/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h index 197a30d221e9..146054ceea8e 100644 --- a/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h +++ b/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h @@ -289,11 +289,6 @@ static inline int inet_csk_reqsk_queue_len(const struct sock *sk) return reqsk_queue_len(&inet_csk(sk)->icsk_accept_queue); } -static inline int inet_csk_reqsk_queue_young(const struct sock *sk) -{ - return reqsk_queue_len_young(&inet_csk(sk)->icsk_accept_queue); -} - static inline int inet_csk_reqsk_queue_is_full(const struct sock *sk) { return inet_csk_reqsk_queue_len(sk) >= sk->sk_max_ack_backlog; diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv4.c b/net/dccp/ipv4.c index 28ad6f187e19..1d6d3aaa8c3d 100644 --- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c +++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c @@ -596,13 +596,7 @@ int dccp_v4_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) if (inet_csk_reqsk_queue_is_full(sk)) goto drop; - /* - * Accept backlog is full. If we have already queued enough - * of warm entries in syn queue, drop request. It is better than - * clogging syn queue with openreqs with exponentially increasing - * timeout. - */ - if (sk_acceptq_is_full(sk) && inet_csk_reqsk_queue_young(sk) > 1) + if (sk_acceptq_is_full(sk)) goto drop; req = inet_reqsk_alloc(&dccp_request_sock_ops, sk, true); diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv6.c b/net/dccp/ipv6.c index 6cbcf399d22b..93c706172f40 100644 --- a/net/dccp/ipv6.c +++ b/net/dccp/ipv6.c @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ static int dccp_v6_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) if (inet_csk_reqsk_queue_is_full(sk)) goto drop; - if (sk_acceptq_is_full(sk) && inet_csk_reqsk_queue_young(sk) > 1) + if (sk_acceptq_is_full(sk)) goto drop; req = inet_reqsk_alloc(&dccp6_request_sock_ops, sk, true); diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index 48fe63c4fe24..cd4f13dda49e 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -6374,13 +6374,7 @@ int tcp_conn_request(struct request_sock_ops *rsk_ops, goto drop; } - - /* Accept backlog is full. If we have already queued enough - * of warm entries in syn queue, drop request. It is better than - * clogging syn queue with openreqs with exponentially increasing - * timeout. - */ - if (sk_acceptq_is_full(sk) && inet_csk_reqsk_queue_young(sk) > 1) { + if (sk_acceptq_is_full(sk)) { NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_LISTENOVERFLOWS); goto drop; } -- cgit v1.2.3