From 4925e8b95623c85ed10fbf7263f9f2a4a6eb90ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shannon Zhao Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:02:40 +0100 Subject: arm64: perf: fix unassigned cpu_pmu->plat_device when probing PMU PPIs commit b265da5a45ce60bd3d7505cc0eaa6cfba50946a1 upstream. Commit d795ef9aa831 ("arm64: perf: don't warn about missing interrupt-affinity property for PPIs") added a check for PPIs so that we avoid parsing the interrupt-affinity property for these naturally affine interrupts. Unfortunately, this check can trigger an early (successful) return and we will not assign the value of cpu_pmu->plat_device. This patch fixes the issue. Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Cc: Kefeng Wang Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch') diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c index cce18c85d2e8..7778453762d8 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c @@ -1318,7 +1318,7 @@ static int armpmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* Don't bother with PPIs; they're already affine */ irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); if (irq >= 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) - return 0; + goto out; irqs = kcalloc(pdev->num_resources, sizeof(*irqs), GFP_KERNEL); if (!irqs) @@ -1355,6 +1355,7 @@ static int armpmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) else kfree(irqs); +out: cpu_pmu->plat_device = pdev; return 0; } -- cgit v1.2.3