From d4019f0a92ab802f385cc9c8ad3ab7b5449712cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 19:38:24 +0530 Subject: cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines: struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; freqs.old = old freq... freqs.new = new freq... cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); /* Change rate here */ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead. There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for doing this work, work/tasklet/etc.. They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag: CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them. All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as double notification would happen otherwise. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson Acked-by: Linus Walleij Acked-by: Russell King Acked-by: Stephen Warren Tested-by: Andrew Lunn Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 16 ++++++---------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c') diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c index 5978b94e0340..e3973dae28a7 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ static struct clk *cpu_clk; static struct clk *dmc0_clk; static struct clk *dmc1_clk; -static struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; static DEFINE_MUTEX(set_freq_lock); /* APLL M,P,S values for 1G/800Mhz */ @@ -179,6 +178,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) unsigned int priv_index; unsigned int pll_changing = 0; unsigned int bus_speed_changing = 0; + unsigned int old_freq, new_freq; int arm_volt, int_volt; int ret = 0; @@ -193,12 +193,12 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) goto exit; } - freqs.old = s5pv210_getspeed(0); - freqs.new = s5pv210_freq_table[index].frequency; + old_freq = s5pv210_getspeed(0); + new_freq = s5pv210_freq_table[index].frequency; /* Finding current running level index */ if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, s5pv210_freq_table, - freqs.old, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H, + old_freq, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H, &priv_index)) { ret = -EINVAL; goto exit; @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) arm_volt = dvs_conf[index].arm_volt; int_volt = dvs_conf[index].int_volt; - if (freqs.new > freqs.old) { + if (new_freq > old_freq) { ret = regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator, arm_volt, arm_volt_max); if (ret) @@ -219,8 +219,6 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) goto exit; } - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); - /* Check if there need to change PLL */ if ((index == L0) || (priv_index == L0)) pll_changing = 1; @@ -431,9 +429,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) } } - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); - - if (freqs.new < freqs.old) { + if (new_freq < old_freq) { regulator_set_voltage(int_regulator, int_volt, int_volt_max); -- cgit v1.2.3