From e6d8207a84b0050df467ec7f5f600f4fef79c0a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Ujfalusi Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 12:02:25 +0200 Subject: dmaengine: ti-dma-crossbar: Correct am335x/am43xx mux value type [ Upstream commit 288e7560e4d3e259aa28f8f58a8dfe63627a1bf6 ] The used 0x1f mask is only valid for am335x family of SoC, different family using this type of crossbar might have different number of electable events. In case of am43xx family 0x3f mask should have been used for example. Instead of trying to handle each family's mask, just use u8 type to store the mux value since the event offsets are aligned to byte offset. Fixes: 42dbdcc6bf965 ("dmaengine: ti-dma-crossbar: Add support for crossbar on AM33xx/AM43xx") Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/dma') diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c index 149ec2bd9bc6..8100ede095d5 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c +++ b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c @@ -46,12 +46,12 @@ struct ti_am335x_xbar_data { struct ti_am335x_xbar_map { u16 dma_line; - u16 mux_val; + u8 mux_val; }; -static inline void ti_am335x_xbar_write(void __iomem *iomem, int event, u16 val) +static inline void ti_am335x_xbar_write(void __iomem *iomem, int event, u8 val) { - writeb_relaxed(val & 0x1f, iomem + event); + writeb_relaxed(val, iomem + event); } static void ti_am335x_xbar_free(struct device *dev, void *route_data) @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static void *ti_am335x_xbar_route_allocate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, } map->dma_line = (u16)dma_spec->args[0]; - map->mux_val = (u16)dma_spec->args[2]; + map->mux_val = (u8)dma_spec->args[2]; dma_spec->args[2] = 0; dma_spec->args_count = 2; -- cgit v1.2.3