From fe7ef5e9ba0c60bab01390493a4c6790f7b093af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Berg Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:07:34 +0100 Subject: regulatory: remove handling of channel bandwidth The channel bandwidth handling isn't really quite right, it assumes that a 40 MHz channel is really two 20 MHz channels, which isn't strictly true. This is the way the regulatory database handling is defined right now though so remove the logic to handle other channel widths. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg --- drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/regd.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/regd.c') diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/regd.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/regd.c index c1608cddc529..be55dc9167f0 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/regd.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/regd.c @@ -158,7 +158,6 @@ static void _rtl_reg_apply_beaconing_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy, const struct ieee80211_reg_rule *reg_rule; struct ieee80211_channel *ch; unsigned int i; - u32 bandwidth = 0; int r; for (band = 0; band < IEEE80211_NUM_BANDS; band++) { @@ -174,8 +173,7 @@ static void _rtl_reg_apply_beaconing_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy, (ch->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR)) continue; if (initiator == NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_COUNTRY_IE) { - r = freq_reg_info(wiphy, ch->center_freq, - bandwidth, ®_rule); + r = freq_reg_info(wiphy, ch->center_freq, ®_rule); if (r) continue; @@ -211,7 +209,6 @@ static void _rtl_reg_apply_active_scan_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband; struct ieee80211_channel *ch; const struct ieee80211_reg_rule *reg_rule; - u32 bandwidth = 0; int r; if (!wiphy->bands[IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ]) @@ -240,7 +237,7 @@ static void _rtl_reg_apply_active_scan_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy, */ ch = &sband->channels[11]; /* CH 12 */ - r = freq_reg_info(wiphy, ch->center_freq, bandwidth, ®_rule); + r = freq_reg_info(wiphy, ch->center_freq, ®_rule); if (!r) { if (!(reg_rule->flags & NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN)) if (ch->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN) @@ -248,7 +245,7 @@ static void _rtl_reg_apply_active_scan_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy, } ch = &sband->channels[12]; /* CH 13 */ - r = freq_reg_info(wiphy, ch->center_freq, bandwidth, ®_rule); + r = freq_reg_info(wiphy, ch->center_freq, ®_rule); if (!r) { if (!(reg_rule->flags & NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN)) if (ch->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN) -- cgit v1.2.3 From 361c9c8b0eeeec7d881e018d5143bf883558c566 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Berg Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 15:57:14 +0100 Subject: regulatory: use IS_ERR macro family for freq_reg_info Instead of returning an error and filling a pointer return the pointer and an ERR_PTR value in error cases. Acked-by: Luis R. Rodriguez Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg --- drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/regd.c | 14 ++++++-------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/regd.c') diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/regd.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/regd.c index be55dc9167f0..7e3ead774fb9 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/regd.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/regd.c @@ -158,7 +158,6 @@ static void _rtl_reg_apply_beaconing_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy, const struct ieee80211_reg_rule *reg_rule; struct ieee80211_channel *ch; unsigned int i; - int r; for (band = 0; band < IEEE80211_NUM_BANDS; band++) { @@ -173,8 +172,8 @@ static void _rtl_reg_apply_beaconing_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy, (ch->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR)) continue; if (initiator == NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_COUNTRY_IE) { - r = freq_reg_info(wiphy, ch->center_freq, ®_rule); - if (r) + reg_rule = freq_reg_info(wiphy, ch->center_freq); + if (IS_ERR(reg_rule)) continue; /* @@ -209,7 +208,6 @@ static void _rtl_reg_apply_active_scan_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband; struct ieee80211_channel *ch; const struct ieee80211_reg_rule *reg_rule; - int r; if (!wiphy->bands[IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ]) return; @@ -237,16 +235,16 @@ static void _rtl_reg_apply_active_scan_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy, */ ch = &sband->channels[11]; /* CH 12 */ - r = freq_reg_info(wiphy, ch->center_freq, ®_rule); - if (!r) { + reg_rule = freq_reg_info(wiphy, ch->center_freq); + if (!IS_ERR(reg_rule)) { if (!(reg_rule->flags & NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN)) if (ch->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN) ch->flags &= ~IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN; } ch = &sband->channels[12]; /* CH 13 */ - r = freq_reg_info(wiphy, ch->center_freq, ®_rule); - if (!r) { + reg_rule = freq_reg_info(wiphy, ch->center_freq); + if (!IS_ERR(reg_rule)) { if (!(reg_rule->flags & NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN)) if (ch->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN) ch->flags &= ~IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN; -- cgit v1.2.3 From 0c0280bd0ba410326eecdaeb1b936696eda6381d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:39:36 +0000 Subject: wireless: make the reg_notifier() void The reg_notifier()'s return value need not be checked as it is only supposed to do post regulatory work and that should never fail. Any behaviour to regulatory that needs to be considered before cfg80211 does work to a driver should be specified by using the already existing flags, the reg_notifier() just does post processing should it find it needs to. Also make lbs_reg_notifier static. Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez [move lbs_reg_notifier to not break compile] Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg --- drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/regd.c | 20 +++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/regd.c') diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/regd.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/regd.c index 7e3ead774fb9..d7d0d4948b01 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/regd.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/regd.c @@ -298,9 +298,9 @@ static void _rtl_reg_apply_world_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy, return; } -static int _rtl_reg_notifier_apply(struct wiphy *wiphy, - struct regulatory_request *request, - struct rtl_regulatory *reg) +static void _rtl_reg_notifier_apply(struct wiphy *wiphy, + struct regulatory_request *request, + struct rtl_regulatory *reg) { /* We always apply this */ _rtl_reg_apply_radar_flags(wiphy); @@ -314,8 +314,6 @@ static int _rtl_reg_notifier_apply(struct wiphy *wiphy, _rtl_reg_apply_world_flags(wiphy, request->initiator, reg); break; } - - return 0; } static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *_rtl_regdomain_select( @@ -348,9 +346,9 @@ static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *_rtl_regdomain_select( static int _rtl_regd_init_wiphy(struct rtl_regulatory *reg, struct wiphy *wiphy, - int (*reg_notifier) (struct wiphy *wiphy, - struct regulatory_request * - request)) + void (*reg_notifier) (struct wiphy *wiphy, + struct regulatory_request * + request)) { const struct ieee80211_regdomain *regd; @@ -379,7 +377,7 @@ static struct country_code_to_enum_rd *_rtl_regd_find_country(u16 countrycode) } int rtl_regd_init(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, - int (*reg_notifier) (struct wiphy *wiphy, + void (*reg_notifier) (struct wiphy *wiphy, struct regulatory_request *request)) { struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = rtl_priv(hw); @@ -421,12 +419,12 @@ int rtl_regd_init(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, return 0; } -int rtl_reg_notifier(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct regulatory_request *request) +void rtl_reg_notifier(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct regulatory_request *request) { struct ieee80211_hw *hw = wiphy_to_ieee80211_hw(wiphy); struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = rtl_priv(hw); RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_REGD, DBG_LOUD, "\n"); - return _rtl_reg_notifier_apply(wiphy, request, &rtlpriv->regd); + _rtl_reg_notifier_apply(wiphy, request, &rtlpriv->regd); } -- cgit v1.2.3